On 22/02/15 19:20, David Faure david.fa...@kdab.com wrote:
On Thursday 19 February 2015 01:55:01 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Arnaud Vrac wrote:
Commit fbeeaf2 in qtbase adds QT_NO_MIMETYPE:
The mime type stuff generates one of the biggest translation units in
QtCore due to the compressed
On Monday 23 February 2015 14:39:49 Arnaud Vrac wrote:
That's true, but the binary file in QStandardPaths::GenericDataLocation +
mime/mime.cache should have been rebuilt with those additional XML files.
Only on systems with shared-mime-info installed.
The XML provider makes things work also on
On 20 February 2015 at 16:28, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@theqtcompany.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt-
[...]
But this is an implementation convenience only. You can't convince me to
drop VS2010 to be able to use them internally inside
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:00:51PM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
Yes, I still don’t like the fact we’re embedding a 1.7M xml file in Qt
Core at all. I’m not too fond of checking the binary file into the
repositories, but it’s probably still better than continuing with the XML
file.
there is no
On 23 Feb 2015, at 13:00, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@theqtcompany.com wrote:
Yes, I still don’t like the fact we’re embedding a 1.7M xml file in Qt
Core at all. I’m not too fond of checking the binary file into the
repositories, but it’s probably still better than continuing with the XML
On Monday 23 February 2015 12:00:51 Knoll Lars wrote:
Yes, I still don’t like the fact we’re embedding a 1.7M xml file in Qt
Core at all. I’m not too fond of checking the binary file into the
repositories, but it’s probably still better than continuing with the XML
file.
Yes. The binary file
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:11 PM, David Faure david.fa...@kdab.com wrote:
On Monday 23 February 2015 12:00:51 Knoll Lars wrote:
Yes, I still don’t like the fact we’re embedding a 1.7M xml file in Qt
Core at all. I’m not too fond of checking the binary file into the
repositories, but it’s
On 23/02/15 10:08, Mathias Hasselmann math...@taschenorakel.de wrote:
Am 23.02.2015 um 08:11 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On Monday 23 February 2015 07:48:37 Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am 17.02.2015 um 14:36 schrieb Cristian Adam:
One could rewrite this small utility into Qt and then it would be
On Monday 23 February 2015 10:08:43 Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am 23.02.2015 um 08:11 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On Monday 23 February 2015 07:48:37 Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am 17.02.2015 um 14:36 schrieb Cristian Adam:
One could rewrite this small utility into Qt and then it would be
On Monday 23 February 2015 13:20:48 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:00:51PM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
Yes, I still don’t like the fact we’re embedding a 1.7M xml file in Qt
Core at all. I’m not too fond of checking the binary file into the
repositories, but it’s probably
On 23/02/15 15:37, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On Monday 23 February 2015 13:20:48 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:00:51PM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
Yes, I still don’t like the fact we’re embedding a 1.7M xml file in Qt
Core at all. I’m not too fond
I think Kai's approach is probably what would work best for now. As much
as I'd like to, we can't yet use C++11 features unconditionally inside the
core of Qt itself as we'd loose a few platforms that we still need to
support.
But we can (and should) certainly use C++11 in our examples and
The qtbase 5.5 branch has been blocked by the revdep for qtdeclarative all
weekend, but I'm still seeing people staging stuff there. Is anyone
actually looking at fixing the problem, or are people just blindly staging
things? The evidence suggests the latter. :-(
Hello Everybody,
I am trying to use a multi-touch screen with my qt application. I have
downloaded the qt 5.4 for Linux (Ubuntu 14.04). But unfortunately
Gesture event does not deliver to the event function.
My goal to catch swipe gesture then assign some task to do so.
I tried to download Qt
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 08:44:57PM +, Richard Moore wrote:
The qtbase 5.5 branch has been blocked by the revdep for qtdeclarative all
weekend, but I'm still seeing people staging stuff there. Is anyone
actually looking at fixing the problem, or are people just blindly staging
things? The
Am 23.02.2015 um 08:11 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On Monday 23 February 2015 07:48:37 Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am 17.02.2015 um 14:36 schrieb Cristian Adam:
One could rewrite this small utility into Qt and then it would be
available everywhere.
Somehow I thought that one of the big benefits
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 07:48:37AM +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am 17.02.2015 um 14:36 schrieb Cristian Adam:
One could rewrite this small utility into Qt and then it would be
available everywhere.
Somehow I thought that one of the big benefits of free software and open
source is,
Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
* RHEL 7 ships 1.0.1, EOL Jun 2014
* CentOS 7 ships 1.0.1, EOL Jun 2014
I think you mean 2024 there (2014 + 10 years).
Of course there are other considerations, like RHEL/CentOS 6 both
shipping GCC 4.4, so we might end up dropping support for those
distributions for
Hello list,
I discussed a bit with Thiago and some others on irc this evening and have
realized that the QStandardPaths patch from [1] and discussion on [2] is
trying to solve too many problems at once. I'll list the problems here and
some possible solutions to these problems afterwards so we can
Hi all,
If I have understood correctly merge from 'dev' to '5.5' should solve this
issue. Or does someone disagree?
Br,
jani
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+jani.heikkinen=theqtcompany.com@qt-
project.org [mailto:development-
On 24 February 2015 at 03:49, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
* RHEL 7 ships 1.0.1, EOL Jun 2014
* CentOS 7 ships 1.0.1, EOL Jun 2014
I think you mean 2024 there (2014 + 10 years).
Whooops, yes, of course. My bad...
Of course there are other considerations, like RHEL/CentOS 6
On Feb 24, 2015 8:06 AM, Adam Majer ad...@zombino.com wrote:
By rewrite, he meant *port to*. So, you don't have to rewrite
anything, just port it to the API that is available on a given
platform. By porting it to Qt, then it would be automatically
available everywhere that Qt is available.
Hello,
i am trying to build qt5.5 from git on windows . i do not want to make a deveolper build but want to build the code as i normally do.
After creating the configure.exe, configureing and starting the build, qtcore build fails because it cannot find headers, which normally reside in
23 matches
Mail list logo
