I think that would be a good compromise.
Simon
Original Message
From: Olivier Goffart
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 15:56
To: development@qt-project.org
Cc: Hausmann Simon
Subject: Re: [Development] Are SiCs through #include cleanups considered
acceptable?
On Friday 10. April 2015 13:38:55
On Wednesday April 08 2015 13:37:09 Salovaara Akseli wrote:
Hi,
I see I'm being cited as René J.V. Bertin (commit
eb55d48d1035d06408ffe73696223464957aa71d) which means I once more ran across a
website that doesn't handle input from an OS X client appropriately. That
should be René, of course
On Saturday 11 April 2015 14:57:39 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Wednesday April 08 2015 13:37:09 Salovaara Akseli wrote:
Hi,
I see I'm being cited as René J.V. Bertin (commit
eb55d48d1035d06408ffe73696223464957aa71d) which means I once more ran
across a website that doesn't handle input
On Thursday 09 April 2015, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Thursday 09 April 2015 11:20:30 Frank Osterfeld wrote:
My vote obviously goes to allowing them.
I had to fix includes when building client code with 5.5 branch (coming
from 5.4.1), so this is an actual issue right now, not just a
On Friday 10 April 2015 14:06:18 André Somers wrote:
Marc Mutz schreef op 10-4-2015 om 13:29:
[...]
For one, you're not supoosed to inherit from value classes. For
another... Oh, I think that's enough reasons :)
That a religious argument instead of a technical one.
Avoiding undefined
On Friday 10 April 2015 15:59:06 Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Friday 10. April 2015 13:38:55 Simon Hausmann wrote:
Yes, over time we will accumulate cruft. We must indeed be very careful
what we put into public header files.
A possibility would be to put them in a
#if
