On 14/06/2015 1:01 pm, Alan Alpert wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Lorn Potter lorn.pot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/06/2015 12:36 am, Samuel Gaist wrote:
failed doesn't always mean there was an error with a direct relation.
I was going to say this, but you beat me to it.
Also,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Lorn Potter lorn.pot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/06/2015 12:36 am, Samuel Gaist wrote:
failed doesn't always mean there was an error with a direct relation.
I was going to say this, but you beat me to it.
Also, errored is just wrong, error is also past
Not available for use are:
* = default,
* = deleted,
Where are these not supported? I have code that (AFAIK) has been using
these already, and IIRC our compiler requirements are lower.
GCC requires 4.7 for this. I think we were discussing whether our minimum is
4.6 or 4.7.
I am
Hi,
Perhaps my German is rusty, but I find on error translates well to German
with bei/beim: Beim Auftreten eines Fehlers
Simon
Original Message
From: Konrad Rosenbaum
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 12:54
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Avoid overloading of
On Thursday 11 June 2015 07:29:51 Smith Martin wrote:
onError is immediately understood by all sentient beings in the universe.
So, apparently either Germans are not sentient or from outside this
universe. Might explain a lot about me...
At the very least I disagree with your use of
If you are saying you didn't know what onError meant, then I truly am
astonished. Understanding onError, given all the other onThis and onThat we
have in QML, really doesn't depend on the This or the That being a verb. I
didn't mean that any of these phrases translates well into other
On 11/06/2015 12:36 am, Samuel Gaist wrote:
failed doesn't always mean there was an error with a direct relation.
I was going to say this, but you beat me to it.
Also, errored is just wrong, error is also past tense.
--
Lorn 'ljp' Potter
Software Engineer, llornkcor technologies / Jolla
