Re: [Development] wec2013 build fails with qt 5.6 beta in dbus.

We ran into similar issues in a few places and the established workaround is a carefully placed #undef interface. Would you be able to tell us where the conflict happened or maybe even make a patch? (see qtnetwork for a similar #undef) Simon From: Gunnar Roth Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015

Re: [Development] wec2013 build fails with qt 5.6 beta in dbus.

Hi Simon. The conflict happens in a dozen files in qtbase/src/dbus/ and qttools/src/qdbus. I just wrote my mail so other can save the time i spend on figuring out what is wrong with the new qt version. As I wrote in another mail, for wince bus should be set to no by default, as it was before (

[Development] Heads up for Qt Bug Report & Code Review users

Hi, Some months ago we asked all Qt users to provide us input on ideas to further improve the Qt developer experience. You spoke. We listened. It was overwhelmingly clear that single sign-on for all Qt Services was at the top of desired features and functionality. Since then, we have been

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.6 Beta released

Thanks and congrats for Qt 5.6 beta from my side too! I had the same question has Helio did, about missing .tar.xz. Nothing urgent, as long as they'll be available at least for the RC and final releases. -Timo 2015-12-18 17:32 GMT+02:00 Helio Chissini de Castro : > Thanks

Re: [Development] Heads up for Qt Bug Report & Code Review users

Hi, On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jokiniva Jukka wrote: > · If you don’t already have Qt credentials, all you need to do is > register at https://login.qt.io/register* using the same email address you > currently use for Bug Tracker and Code Review. If

Re: [Development] Heads up for Qt Bug Report & Code Review users

On Monday 21 December 2015 08:48:37 Jokiniva Jukka wrote: > Hi, > > Some months ago we asked all Qt users to provide us input on ideas to > further improve the Qt developer experience. You spoke. We listened. It was > overwhelmingly clear that single sign-on for all Qt Services was at the top >

Re: [Development] How to link a commit to a bug report

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:15:19AM +0100, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > Il 20/12/2015 08:56, Frederic Marchal ha scritto: > >In the meantime, while I'm taming gerrit, how do I inform any reader of > >QTBUG-50068 that I'm working on a patch? > > After you push your patch to gerrit you can simply

Re: [Development] Heads up for Qt Bug Report & Code Review users

>>-Original Message- >>From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On Behalf >>Of Sean Harmer >>Sent: 21. joulukuuta 2015 11:22 >>To: development@qt-project.org >>Subject: Re: [Development] Heads up for Qt Bug Report & Code Review users >> >>On Monday 21 December 2015

Re: [Development] Qt SerialBus still planned to be in Qt 5.6.0?

Yes, as a technology preview. -- Tuukka > Jeff Tranter kirjoitti 21.12.2015 kello 19.38: > > I was curious if Qt SerialBus is still planned to be in the Qt 5.6.0 release, > given that it was not included in the beta? > ___ >

[Development] Qt 5.7 new feature list needs to be created/updated

Hi all, According to current plans we will have Qt 5.7 feature freeze 15th Jan 2016. That is already quite close so we should have pretty good understanding of new features for Qt 5.7. So please start listing all new features for Qt 5.7 in new features list (