Re: [Development] QtQuick Call for Maintainer

2016-04-05 Thread Knoll Lars
On 05/04/16 22:56, "Development on behalf of Giuseppe D'Angelo" wrote: >Il 10/03/2016 08:37, Knoll Lars ha scritto: >>> > >>> >Individually or together, +1 from me. >> Fully agree with what

[Development] QTBUG-52360: is ARMv5 still supported?

2016-04-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
If it is, can someone try a regular toolchain for that platform with Qt 5.6 and report whether QtCore links? I'd like a second opinion with a different toolchain than the reporter. The question is: if you use functionality, do you need an extra -l flag? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira

Re: [Development] QtQuick Call for Maintainer

2016-04-05 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
Il 10/03/2016 08:37, Knoll Lars ha scritto: > >Individually or together, +1 from me. Fully agree with what Alan is saying, so another +1 from me. I guess it's time to do the honours then? :) Cheers, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (UK) Ltd., a

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches

2016-04-05 Thread Jan Kundrát
If you want to know the names of all branches which contain a given ref, there's also the `git branch --contains yourRef`. Cheers, Jan -- Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/ ___ Development mailing list

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches

2016-04-05 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 2016-04-04 08:49, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > [...] there's no way to obtain the branch from a given commit? There is `git name-rev`, but it may or may not work or give you the "best" answer. At least it should give you *a* branch name if a SHA is the tip of a local branch. I'm not sure offhand

Re: [Development] MSVC2012 in CI

2016-04-05 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
On Sunday, March 20, 2016 12:07:01 PM Sean Harmer wrote: > Hi, > > Can MSVC 2012 configurations be removed from the CI please? My understanding > is that this compiler was only kept around to support Windows EC but that > this is now removed from 5.7. I'd love to remove it, but it's blocked by

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches (was: pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?)

2016-04-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 4 de abril de 2016 10:25:16 PDT Welbourne Edward wrote: > $ git stash > $ git pull -r > $ git stash pop Also: $ git fetch $ git rebase --autostash It's exactly the same. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches (was: pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?)

2016-04-05 Thread Welbourne Edward
I mentioned: >> merge-base - if you have a strict tree, this isn't a merge, so it's >> where one was branched off the other, but nothing about the merge-base >> or any of its ancestors contains any hint as to which branch it was on >> when it was committed. René J.V. Bertin replied: > In short,

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches (was: pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?)

2016-04-05 Thread Welbourne Edward
> Forgot - maybe a stupid question, but can you set up a topic branch to > track a remote branch (and would that make sense)? $ git checkout -b topic remote/branch will, by default, set up topic so that, while it's checked out, git pull fetches remote/branch to merge with it (or rebase it onto)