On 2016-09-23, André Pönitz wrote:
> That gives already "surprising" behaviour if fed with QChar('a') and
> QString("a") in a row.
>
> And it is "surprising" to a degree that I'd call it buggy.
Then try feeding it boolean's and strings.
QQmlPropertyMap map;
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:56:30AM +, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Indeed; having all values of some type equivalent is worse (for the "has
> my value changed" test you illustrate, at least) than having a value not
> equal to itself (which triggers a "changed" event for a non-change). In
> fact
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:22:08AM +0200, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > There is not much of a choice. An equivalence relation is reflexive,
> > i.e. at least Foo(a) == Foo(a) must be true. Lacking the ability
> > to compare Foos, treating them all equal at least doesn't break the
> > relation.
>
>
On 2016-09-22 16:58, André Pönitz wrote:
> There is not much of a choice. An equivalence relation is reflexive,
> i.e. at least Foo(a) == Foo(a) must be true.
JFTR...
auto nan = qNaN();
assert(nan != nan); // okay
assert(!(nan == nan)); // okay
--
Matthew
On sexta-feira, 23 de setembro de 2016 09:07:13 PDT Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> We have finally first Qt 5.8.0 beta snapshot available
>
> Windows: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.8/5.8.0-beta/570/
>
> Mac: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.8/5.8.0-beta/439/
>
> src:
Olivier Goffart
> What use case did you have in mind where a reflexive relation is any usefull?
Well, having x == x for all x is generally considered a useful property
of equality. That's all "reflexive" is saying.
> There is the case of the key of a QHash or in a QSet, but even then i'm not
>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:41:29AM +0200, Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Thursday 22 September 2016 08:55:13 Liang Qi wrote:
> > Give the merge permission to everyone is obiviously not a solution.
>
> Not everyone, but approvers, maybe? Merges need to be reviewed like any other
> commit, so why are they
On Donnerstag, 22. September 2016 22:58:09 CEST André Pönitz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 06:04:58AM +0200, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> > Am 22.09.2016 um 00:58 schrieb André Pönitz:
> > >On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > >>>No, it's not. It's changing
Hi,
We have finally first Qt 5.8.0 beta snapshot available
Windows: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.8/5.8.0-beta/570/
Mac: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.8/5.8.0-beta/439/
src: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.8/5.8.0-beta/latest_src/
Linux ones are there as well but those
I did git checkout 5.8 at the qt5 level but kept my qtbase module on dev
branch. That seems to work.
martin
From: Development on
behalf of Vlad Stelmahovsky
Sent: Friday,
10 matches
Mail list logo