Re: [Development] Proposal to adjust release candidate process

> On 22 Dec 2016, at 08:09, Maurice Kalinowski wrote: > > Hence, > > Technology Preview > Preview > Release Preview > Release Candidate > Release Tech Preview is so far the term for a module which is released but we reserve the right to continue making API changes

Re: [Development] Proposal to adjust release candidate process

Hence, Technology Preview Preview Release Preview Release Candidate Release \o/ Maurice Von: Development [mailto:development-bounces+maurice.kalinowski=qt...@qt-project.org] Im Auftrag von Marco Bubke Gesendet: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 4:21 PM An: Thiago Macieira

Re: [Development] Calendar Systems proposal

On 2016-12-17, Soroush Rabiei wrote: > it's wrong to add such implementation to QDate. My view of QDate is this: > QDate represents a day in time. So it only needs to know what day it is > (how many days are to the day 0). And it is exactly things like that that would

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 prebuild binary packages( was: Re: Qt 5.9)

LET'S DO IT! And thank you for following through on this idea. This will reduce our package testing burden significantly which is very important because it lowers the barrier to entry for us to actually add new platforms/installers. For example, adding tvOS to the combined macOS/iOS/Android

Re: [Development] Proposal to adjust release candidate process

I think many users see a beta as something you better not touch, but a release candidates can be trusted much more. I know it's not intended that way but people learned by experiences. [?] Maybe "pre release" or "preview" could be a name to show the final status?

Re: [Development] Proposal to adjust release candidate process

Em terça-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2016, às 13:34:39 BRST, Tuukka Turunen escreveu: > If desired, we could use some other name than "Release Candidate 1" for the > release that begins the last phase of the release. It could be called "Beta > 2" or "Technology preview", if so desired. Personally, I

Re: [Development] Proposal to adjust release candidate process

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Sean Harmer > Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:14 > I wonder how much of the current pressure on releases is driven by the time- > based release policy. We

Re: [Development] Proposal to adjust release candidate process

> -Original Message- > From: sean.harmer On Behalf Of Sean Harmer > Sent: tiistaina 20. joulukuuta 2016 17.14 > To: development@qt-project.org > Cc: Tuukka Turunen ; releas...@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Proposal to adjust release candidate process >