Re: [Development] QtCS 2017 logging/tracing session notes

2017-10-11 Thread Christian Gagneraud
On 11 October 2017 at 21:20, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > In the kernel mode case, you access the events from /proc, which is > backed by a kernel RCU list/buffer, i don't know how they have > implemented their userspace solution, but i'm expecting something > "pretty well

Re: [Development] How to get Qt_5.9.1_PRIVATE_API

2017-10-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 11 de outubro de 2017 13:39:03 PDT Rex Dieter wrote: > The patch's purpose looks appealing, are there "reasons(tm)" it cannot be > used by default upstream? Yeah: we don't want to. It would make the lives of the developers harder: you'd have to recompile everything the moment

Re: [Development] QtCS 2017 logging/tracing session notes

2017-10-11 Thread Arnaud Clère
Hi Christian, Thank you for your interest and your questions... Regarding the ParTraP language, currently, you need to parse, transform and classify unstructured traces in a JSON form to be able to use it. JSON will remain the pivot format between trace stores and tools so, if ETW or whatever

Re: [Development] How to get Qt_5.9.1_PRIVATE_API

2017-10-11 Thread Rex Dieter
Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 10 de outubro de 2017 23:56:08 PDT Martin Koller wrote: >> Hi, >> >> on openSuse 42.2 I have a self-built 5.9.1 version and also the openSuse >> 5.9.1 installed one. For some reason (which is not important for my >> question) my application picks up the

Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 11 de outubro de 2017 12:14:17 PDT Jake Petroules wrote: > VxWorks 7 = gcc 4.8.1 has been in GCC for 10 years, so we should be ok. Can someone check INTEGRITY? Just: #include int main() { std::mt19937 mt; } -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software

Re: [Development] How to get Qt_5.9.1_PRIVATE_API

2017-10-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 10 de outubro de 2017 23:56:08 PDT Martin Koller wrote: > Hi, > > on openSuse 42.2 I have a self-built 5.9.1 version and also the openSuse > 5.9.1 installed one. For some reason (which is not important for my > question) my application picks up the openSuse library but fails with

Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-11 Thread Jake Petroules
VxWorks 7 = gcc 4.8.1 -- Jake Petroules - jake.petrou...@qt.io The Qt Company - Silicon Valley Qbs build tool evangelist - qbs.io From: Development on behalf of Simon Hausmann Sent:

Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-11 Thread Simon Hausmann
Hi, Integrity (ghs) is checked during the qt5 build. Vxworks is the only target I can think of that is not CI tested. But iirc that’s a gcc flavor. Simon On 11. Oct 2017, at 20:49, Thiago Macieira > wrote: Are there any supported

[Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
Are there any supported platforms that we do not test in the CI? Probably INTEGRITY? I'm asking based on this outcome from QtCS: > We will not add compilers that are worse than what we have today. Right now, Qt 5.10 has a configure-time warning if we don't find C++11 . I'd like to make that

[Development] CSPRNG vs DPRNG

2017-10-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
Hello I've come to the conclusion that adding QRandomGenerator, a (mostly) cryptogrphically-secure PRNG, without adding a corresponding deterministic PRNG is a bad idea, especially with the changes that went in to the examples that changed all uses of qrand() to QRandomGenerator. We're telling

Re: [Development] How to get Qt_5.9.1_PRIVATE_API

2017-10-11 Thread Martin Koller
On Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2017 10:13:07 CEST Martin Koller wrote: > On Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2017 09:06:53 CEST Mitch Curtis wrote: > > Does -developer-build help? > > sadly no. > it still just contains > 2 0x00 0x0dcbd2c9 Qt_5_PRIVATE_API > > instead of the openSuse versions: > 2 0x00 0x0be84779

Re: [Development] How to get Qt_5.9.1_PRIVATE_API

2017-10-11 Thread Christoph Feck
On 11.10.2017 08:56, Martin Koller wrote: on openSuse 42.2 I have a self-built 5.9.1 version and also the openSuse 5.9.1 installed one. For some reason (which is not important for my question) my application picks up the openSuse library but fails with the error libQt5Core.so.5: version

Re: [Development] Nominating Tomi Korpipää for approver

2017-10-11 Thread Antti Määttä
+1 -Antti From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+antti.maatta=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Miikka Heikkinen Sent: keskiviikko 11. lokakuuta 2017 10.03 To: Pasi Keränen ; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Tomi Korpipää for approver

Re: [Development] How to get Qt_5.9.1_PRIVATE_API

2017-10-11 Thread Kevin Funk
On Wednesday, 11 October 2017 10:13:07 CEST Martin Koller wrote: > On Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2017 09:06:53 CEST Mitch Curtis wrote: > > Does -developer-build help? > > sadly no. > it still just contains > 2 0x00 0x0dcbd2c9 Qt_5_PRIVATE_API > > instead of the openSuse versions: > 2 0x00 0x0be84779

Re: [Development] QtCS 2017 logging/tracing session notes

2017-10-11 Thread Christian Gagneraud
Hi, Going through the wiki, the pdf and the codereview again, i see 3 different things: - Qt: Logging framework - ModMed: real-time dissection of organised/structured logs - Ltt/ETW: event tracing/profiling Different needs, different means, different reasons and different goals. I like all 3!

Re: [Development] How to get Qt_5.9.1_PRIVATE_API

2017-10-11 Thread Martin Koller
On Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2017 09:06:53 CEST Mitch Curtis wrote: > Does -developer-build help? sadly no. it still just contains 2 0x00 0x0dcbd2c9 Qt_5_PRIVATE_API instead of the openSuse versions: 2 0x00 0x0be84779 Qt_5.9.1_PRIVATE_API > > > -Original Message- > > From: Development

Re: [Development] Clazy results for Qt codebase

2017-10-11 Thread Eike Ziller
> On 10. Oct 2017, at 15:41, Sergio Martins wrote: > > > > Oops, here's the non-internal URL: > https://docs.kdab.com/analysis/qt5/clazy.html > > Thanks Mitch I’d be interested in seeing results for Qt Creator too :) Br, Eike > > On 2017-10-10 14:27, Sergio

Re: [Development] How to get Qt_5.9.1_PRIVATE_API

2017-10-11 Thread Mitch Curtis
Does -developer-build help? > -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Martin Koller > Sent: Wednesday, 11 October 2017 8:56 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] How to get

Re: [Development] Nominating Tomi Korpipää for approver

2017-10-11 Thread Miikka Heikkinen
+1 from me. -Miikka From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+miikka.heikkinen=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Pasi Keränen Sent: 11. lokakuuta 2017 7:13 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Nominating Tomi Korpipää for approver Hi, I’d like to nominate Tomi Korpipää

[Development] How to get Qt_5.9.1_PRIVATE_API

2017-10-11 Thread Martin Koller
Hi, on openSuse 42.2 I have a self-built 5.9.1 version and also the openSuse 5.9.1 installed one. For some reason (which is not important for my question) my application picks up the openSuse library but fails with the error libQt5Core.so.5: version `Qt_5.9.1_PRIVATE_API' not found (required by