> On 20 Dec 2017, at 19:28, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On quarta-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2017 09:42:39 PST Lars Knoll wrote:
>>> I still call a mistake to use Qt 4.8 for ANY new project in 2018. Whether
>>> KDAB or ICS or TQtC actually makes money off other people's
On quarta-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2017 09:42:39 PST Lars Knoll wrote:
> > I still call a mistake to use Qt 4.8 for ANY new project in 2018. Whether
> > KDAB or ICS or TQtC actually makes money off other people's mistakes is
> > totally orthogonal. Just don't be jack^*&*es and do advise your
> On 20 Dec 2017, at 00:13, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On terça-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2017 14:39:24 PST Jake Petroules wrote:
Am I doing something wrong, or is it really so that nobody tested if Qt
> =
4.8.5 builds for QNX 6.5 before me?
No, at least
On quarta-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2017 06:49:40 PST Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> Sounds good, +1, good riddance.
+1
With the drop of QNX 6.6, we'll finally be C++11 core language feature-
complete, only ~7 years after it came out. Fortunately, those numbers seem to
be coming down. We should be
I'm repeatedly getting this error:
Failed to provision template 'qtci-linux-Ubuntu-16.04-x86_64-1-b46ac1':
Failed repeatedly to launch build/test agent
Details:
https://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qtwebkit/tasks/1513784851
No log exist.
--
Regards,
Konstantin
On fredag 15. desember 2017 20.04.33 CET Tuukka Turunen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I propose to remove support for QNX 6.6 from Qt 5.11 onwards.
Yes please, it has been a bit of a trouble maker every once in a while :)
For example not needing to patch a header file on the platform is a good thing.
On 20 December 2017 at 16:17, Lars Knoll wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here are the promised numbers:
> *Version*
> *Compiler*
> *Commercial*
>
> *Version*
> *Compiler*
> *Opensource*
> 5.10.0
> MinGW530
> 22 %
>
> 5.10.0
> MinGW530
> 25 %
> 5.10.0
> MSVC2013_64
> 14 %
>
> 5.10.0
>
Hi all,
here are the promised numbers:
Version
Compiler
Commercial
Version
Compiler
Opensource
5.10.0
MinGW530
22 %
5.10.0
MinGW530
25 %
5.10.0
MSVC2013_64
14 %
5.10.0
MSVC2013_64
15 %
5.10.0
MSVC2015
20 %
5.10.0
MSVC2015
18 %
5.10.0
MSVC2015_64
20 %
5.10.0
MSVC2015_64
Ohhh.. exactly, many thanks... :)
20.12.2017 13:53, Oswald Buddenhagen пишет:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 01:03:30PM +0300, Denis Shienkov wrote:
c:/Android/gstreamer/armv7c:/Android/gstreamer/armv7/include/gstreamer-1.0
i really wouldn't expect this to work. ;)
the problems seems to be
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 01:03:30PM +0300, Denis Shienkov wrote:
>c:/Android/gstreamer/armv7c:/Android/gstreamer/armv7/include/gstreamer-1.0
>
i really wouldn't expect this to work. ;)
the problems seems to be that pkg-config outputs the paths in a format
that cannot be possibly understood by
Next, I have modified the link_pkgconfig.prf to
add there a message output like:
...
INCLUDEPATH *= $$PKGCONFIG_INCLUDEPATH
DEFINES *= $$PKGCONFIG_DEFINES
message("bla $$INCLUDEPATH")
...
and I see required output:
Project MESSAGE: bla
I even have tried following from the Windows cmd durectly:
set PATH=c:\pkgconfig\bin;%PATH%
set PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR=c:/Android/gstreamer/armv7/lib/pkgconfig
set PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR=c:/Android/gstreamer/armv7
pkg-config.exe --cflags gstreamer-1.0
Output is:
-pthread
Hi Oswald,
Hmm.. many thanks for your hint, I have modified the
pkg-conf env variables to:
1. PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR = c:\Android\gstreamer\armv7\lib\pkgconfig
- a path to all *.pc files.
2. PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR = c:\Android\gstreamer\armv7
- a path to a 'fake' sysroot, which contains an
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:39:20AM +0300, Denis Shienkov wrote:
> This says about the 'sysroot', but, I have no any sysroot for Android kit,
>
that's just implausible. you must have something that resembles a
sysroot, even if it's not declared as such. if you don't find anything
else, just use
Hi all,
is it possible to use the pkg-config to build the
Android's applications?
e.g. I want to use the GStreamer for the Android
application, using the pkg-config.
I already have installed & configured the the Android
Kit, have downloaded the Gstreamer SDK for ARMv7 platform.
I use the
On marți, 19 decembrie 2017 11:25:17 EET Sergio Martins wrote:
[...]
>
> The problem of clang generating bigger binaries was much improved with
> -Oz, now size increase is only 10%.
>
Which, on ARM, usually means the bins are slower ;-)
[...]
Anyway, a +0.5 also from my side.
Cheers,
BogDan.
16 matches
Mail list logo