On Tuesday, 19 March 2019 09:03:16 PDT Jason H wrote:
> I don't know why you can't just use a C/C++ preprocessor to generate the
> qml? For Clang, -E : Only run the preprocessor
qglobal.h is assembler-safe too. -D__ASSEMBLER__ and it won't produce C or C++
code that would confuse your parser.
> On 18/03/19 12:11, Pierre-Yves Siret wrote:
> > This can be done with QQmlFileSelector :
> >
> > QQmlApplicationEngine engine;
> > QQmlFileSelector* qmlFileSelector = QQmlFileSelector::get();
> >
> > #if QT_VERSION >= QT_VERSION_CHECK(5, 12, 0)
> >
Due to poor performance and stale integrations we have decided to revert
the Coin baseline on
Tue Mar 19 14:34:03 UTC 2019
Reverted patches from previous state:
https://testresults.qt.io/ci/aakeskim/production_updates/changelog_20190319_reverted
Currently active production:
On Monday, 18 March 2019 01:05:22 PDT Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> Brett is the maintainer of Qt Remote Objects. Thus he should be
> documented as a maintainer, and should also be an approver. Brett has
> been effectively maintaining QRO since 2014, so it seems like a slam
> dunk to give him the
Thanks for the initiative, Tuuka and team. Much appreciated.
As part of the meeting, please review the points raised in previous
discussions [1][2]. Three major pain points were:
(A) Downloading metadata is very time-consuming.
(B) The automatic mirror selection algorithm doesn't always
Hi,
It is great to hear there will be done some update on Maintenance Tool
I don’t know about internal architecture of the software, but it would be great
if Maintenance Tool could handle locally a little “cache” to avoid always
(re)downloading from server all information about Qt releases.
HI all,
We have released Qt 5.13.0 Beta1 today, see
https://blog.qt.io/blog/2019/03/19/qt-5-13-0-beta1-released/
Big thanks to everyone involved!
br,
Jani Heikkinen
Release Manager
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
Hi,
Online installer has over time become quite crowded with different releases and
many have noticed that it is getting quite slow at times. Having all this
default content is also problematic for those who mirror Qt as it would take a
significant amount of disk space to have a complete
+1 from me too.
--
Alex
From: Development on behalf of Ville
Voutilainen
Sent: Monday, 18 March 2019 9:05:22 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Nominating Brett Stottlemeyer for Approver status
Brett is the maintainer of Qt
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 7:55:53 AM CET Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in the end all advice goes into the direction of using one of the
> standard services in combination with using my own brain when working on
> the code.
>
> Unfortunately nobody pointed out a realistic way how a 3rd
I was under the same impression, +1 from me too of course.
Regards,
Volker
On Monday, 18 March 2019 12:23:29 CET Lars Knoll wrote:
> Obvious +1, I thought he had those rights already since a long time.
>
> Cheers,
> Lars
>
> On 18 Mar 2019, at 10:07, Simon Hausmann
>
Hi all,
in the end all advice goes into the direction of using one of the
standard services in combination with using my own brain when working on
the code.
Unfortunately nobody pointed out a realistic way how a 3rd party project
could make use of the infrastructure used by the Qt project nor
12 matches
Mail list logo
