Re: [Development] Gerrit is back / email template changed

2019-05-28 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Dienstag, 28. Mai 2019 16:53:20 CEST Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > On tirsdag 28. mai 2019 16:26:18 CEST Florian Bruhin wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 02:17:19PM +, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > > > If someone has other ideas, we can discuss them! > > > > On a related note - I'm a bit

Re: [Development] QList for Qt 6

2019-05-28 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 27 May 2019 04:51:35 PDT Eike Ziller wrote: > > * QVector for Qt 6 will most likely be updated with the changes Thiago has > > waiting since quite some years > What is the summary for these? The long story short is that the begin pointer and size members move from the d pointer to the

Re: [Development] Gerrit is back / email template changed

2019-05-28 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
On tirsdag 28. mai 2019 16:26:18 CEST Florian Bruhin wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 02:17:19PM +, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > > If someone has other ideas, we can discuss them! > > On a related note - I'm a bit confused about the ellipsis in the subject. > Why "Change in

Re: [Development] Qt 5.12.4 changes files

2019-05-28 Thread Jani Heikkinen
> -Original Message- > From: Frederik Gladhorn > Sent: tiistai 28. toukokuuta 2019 15.44 > To: development@qt-project.org > Cc: Jani Heikkinen > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.12.4 changes files > > On mandag 27. mai 2019 10:42:44 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote: > > Hi, > > Initial ones

Re: [Development] Gerrit is back / email template changed

2019-05-28 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 02:17:19PM +, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > If someone has other ideas, we can discuss them! On a related note - I'm a bit confused about the ellipsis in the subject. Why "Change in ...qtgamepad[5.12.4]:" and not just "Change in qtgamepad[5.12.4]:"? Florian --

Re: [Development] Gerrit is back / email template changed

2019-05-28 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
Quick update... ... after some contemplation and being made aware that the subject becomes rather long, we removed the [Gerrit] from the subject again. Filtering on the sender is easy enough. If someone has other ideas, we can discuss them! Cheers, Frederik On Tuesday, May 28, 2019 3:17:24

Re: [Development] Gerrit is back / email template changed

2019-05-28 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
Hi all, We got the suggestion to change the email template, now the subject lines of what Gerrit sends to your inbox will be a bit more helpful. Old: Change in ...qtgamepad[5.12.4]: Add changes file for Qt 5.12.4 New: [Gerrit] Merged - ...qtgamepad[5.12.4]: Add changes file for Qt 5.12.4 So

Re: [Development] Gerrit is back

2019-05-28 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
On lørdag 25. mai 2019 18:11:59 CEST Richard Weickelt wrote: > > There are more tweaks that would be nice to apply to the UI to make it > > better. Does the new version make this any easier? What's your advice for > > people who'd like to contribute UI tweaks? What's the best way to > > proceed?

Re: [Development] Qt 5.12.4 changes files

2019-05-28 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
On mandag 27. mai 2019 10:42:44 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Hi, > Initial ones here: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/message:%2522Add+changes+file+for+Qt+5. > 12.4%2522+status:open > > Maintainers, please do needed modifications & make sure reviews are done > during this week Did the git

[Development] [Announce] Qt Creator 4.9.1 released

2019-05-28 Thread List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development
We are happy to announce the release of Qt Creator 4.9.1 ! https://blog.qt.io/blog/2019/05/28/qt-creator-4-9-1-released/ -- Eike Ziller Principal Software Engineer The Qt Company GmbH Rudower Chaussee 13 D-12489 Berlin eike.zil...@qt.io http://qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius,

Re: [Development] Proposal: Using Gerrit for new approver proposals?

2019-05-28 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
  22.05.2019, 15:54, "Florian Bruhin" :> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 08:09:59AM +, Alex Blasche wrote:>>  It is readable for all just not editable: https://codereview.qt-project.org/admin/groups/12,members>> What's up with "removed " in that list? It sounds like the> user isn't interested in