Cristián Maureira-Fredes wrote:
> Even if it's a special module we have around only for Qt6
Hopefully that will be a long time! I sure hope you are not already planning
yet another backwards-incompatible release. A lot of stuff has not even
moved to Qt 6 yet!
Kevin Kofler
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> By default, I'd like us to produce x86-64 v2 code, which is SSE4.
But v1 will still be available for distribution packaging? As long as that
is the case, I do not see a major issue, it will just be one more caveat for
distribution packaging. (Distributions still
On 19/1/2022 1:01 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
I've also found that macOS universal builds, WASM, Android and maybe some more
are improperly detecting support. Specifically for universal builds, what we
detect depends on the order in which you specify the architectures. This is
buggy at a
For Qt 6.4, I'd like to propose we change the way we detect and enable SIMD
support. TL;DR:
* Assume all compilers support 5-year-old stuff
* Up the minimum CPU for Linux, Window and macOS/x86
* Fix macOS Universal builds to use the minimum
* Add an option to cmake to choose a minimum matching
On Dienstag, 18. Januar 2022 15:10:48 CET Cristián Maureira-Fredes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to nominate Sona as maintainer [1]
> for the qt5compat module, which at the moment doesn't
> have one. Even if it's a special module we have around
> only for Qt6, we need a responsible person in
Another +1.
Thanks for stepping up, Sona!
Cheers,
Lars
> On 18 Jan 2022, at 16:36, Mårten Nordheim wrote:
>
> +1 from me as well
>
>
> From: Development on behalf of Cristián
> Maureira-Fredes
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 15:10
> To:
+1 from me as well
From: Development on behalf of Cristián
Maureira-Fredes
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 15:10
To: development
Subject: [Development] Nominating Sona Kurazyan as maintainer of qt5compat
Hello,
I would like to nominate Sona as
that's no-brainer +1
From: Development on behalf of Cristián
Maureira-Fredes
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 3:10 PM
To: development
Subject: [Development] Nominating Sona Kurazyan as maintainer of qt5compat
Hello,
I would like to nominate Sona as
+1 from me. Her help and support on Qt Remote Objects has been great.
Brett
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
+1
On 1/18/22 15:10, Cristián Maureira-Fredes wrote:
Hello,
I would like to nominate Sona as maintainer [1]
for the qt5compat module, which at the moment doesn't
have one. Even if it's a special module we have around
only for Qt6, we need a responsible person in charge of it.
She has been
On 1/18/22 15:10, Cristián Maureira-Fredes wrote:
>> Due to her contributions in qtbase and other modules [3],
>> I firmly believe she will manage to maintain it.
Jörg Bornemann (18 January 2022 15:15) replied
> +1
>
> I share your belief. :)
That makes two of us ;^>
+1
Eddy.
+1 from me
--
Alex
From: Development on behalf of Jörg
Bornemann
Sent: Tuesday, 18 January 2022 15:15
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Sona Kurazyan as maintainer of qt5compat
On 1/18/22 15:10, Cristián
+1
Sone indeed does a very good job!
Best regards
Jarek
From: Development on behalf of Cristián
Maureira-Fredes
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 3:10 PM
To: development
Subject: [Development] Nominating Sona Kurazyan as maintainer of qt5compat
Hello,
On 1/18/22 15:10, Cristián Maureira-Fredes wrote:
Due to her contributions in qtbase and other modules [3],
I firmly believe she will manage to maintain it.
+1
I share your belief. :)
--
Jörg Bornemann | The Qt Company
___
Development mailing
Hello,
I would like to nominate Sona as maintainer [1]
for the qt5compat module, which at the moment doesn't
have one. Even if it's a special module we have around
only for Qt6, we need a responsible person in charge of it.
She has been working mainly in qtbase in the last years
and took care
15 matches
Mail list logo
