+1 from me as well :)
> Am 22/11/2022 um 22:27 schrieb A. Pönitz :
>
>
>
> I'd like to nominate Marcus Tillmanns as an approver for the Qt project.
>
> Marcus has been working on Qt Creator since April, mostly on Docker
> support and remote file access/command execution, but also on LLDB
>
+1 for sure
From: Development on behalf of Alessandro
Portale via Development
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 11:11 PM
To: A. Pönitz; development@qt-project.org; Cristian Adam; Jaroslaw Kobus
Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Marcus Tillmanns as
Hey, I wanted to nominate him!
Anyways, +1,
Br,
Alessandro
(Disclaimer: Marcus regularly lets me win in table tennis)
Von: Development im Auftrag von Jaroslaw
Kobus via Development
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2022 22:49
An: A. Pönitz;
+1
Good job, Marcus!
Jarek
From: Development on behalf of Cristian
Adam via Development
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 10:39 PM
To: A. Pönitz; development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Marcus Tillmanns as Approver
+1
Cheers,
+1
Cheers,
Cristian.
Disclaimer: I work with Marcus in the same team.
From: Development on behalf of A. Pönitz
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 22:27
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Nominating Marcus Tillmanns as Approver
I'd like to
I'd like to nominate Marcus Tillmanns as an approver for the Qt project.
Marcus has been working on Qt Creator since April, mostly on Docker
support and remote file access/command execution, but also on LLDB
support and various other changes across the code base.
He made already several
Hi Qt developers,
Thank you all for your interest in our study. We really appreciate your
responses and suggestions. This gave us a better understanding of what you are
interested in and what you are concerned about.
To help you better understand who we are and what we are doing, here is
[Thiago Macieira told me to move my Qt + TSAN diskussion from Interest
mailinglist over here]
my System is a freshly installed Ubuntu 22.04, all updates
background: im currently testing a green-field 400kLOC project with ASAN and
TSAN (in the future with MSAN)
there is some sort of simple
On Tuesday, 22 November 2022 04:35:35 PST Joerg Bornemann via Development
wrote:
> On 11/21/22 03:38, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > I've just finished a qtbase build on Linux with two sub-architectures and
> > the symbol comparison of all the resulting libraries has shown zero
> > difference.
On 11/21/22 03:38, Thiago Macieira wrote:
I've just finished a qtbase build on Linux with two sub-architectures and the
symbol comparison of all the resulting libraries has shown zero difference.
Tomorrow I will test all other modules (except qtwebengine). The code is ugly,
so I'd appreciate
10 matches
Mail list logo
