>
> Can you provide more details on what the difficulties are and when relief
> should
> be expected for this?
>
> When you say "supply chain issues" for C++17, I am thinking that those
> customers are buying compilers in a DVD in a box and that is stuck in a
> container still sailing from
As Marc already mentioned, we are having troubles with users not being able to
upgrade on various platforms.
We even have customers who are not able to upgrade to C++17 yet due to supply
chain issues.
Basically, the idea from our end has been to take a two-step approach by first
enabling
> On 04.05.23 08:52, Maurice Kalinowski via Development wrote:
> [...]
> > This is the situation we experience in multiple industries still, with an
> increasing pressure from multiple angles to get those finally supporting Qt 6.
> Hence, things are getting bett
You are absolutely correct that this module started with a pure automotive
focus, back then called Qt IVI.
However, we recognized that its functionality can also be utilized in a generic
way, which was the reason for the rename and generalization efforts done in the
past. There might still be
