On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:31:08 PM ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 de November de 2011 15.47.00, Rohan McGovern wrote:
Hello,
In Qt5, we no longer appear to have any mkspecs for cross-compiling for
ARM or MIPS. They were tied up with qws, so they were removed when
On Friday, January 13, 2012 12:33:46 PM ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
Hello
We've got a problem with -reduce-relocations. tl;dr: it's a broken concept
and we either add a permanent workaround or we stop using it. The permanent
workaround is to compile all executables in PIC/PIE mode.
I think
On Thursday, January 12, 2012 06:50:58 AM ext xizhi@nokia.com wrote:
Hi,
Practically, since Qt Project has no plan to support Qt5 in Harmattan,
I believe the Harmattan-specific code sits in its own clone repository
(same as for QtonPi [1] and ), right?
[1]
Hi Pierre,
On Monday, January 16, 2012 10:57:28 AM ext Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
Hello everybody,
As it is my first post in that list, a bit of presentation is due: my name
is Pierre Stirnweiss, and I am part of the Calligra (www.calligra.org)
team. I initially started coding in KOffice
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 01:41:57 PM ext alex.blas...@nokia.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+alex.blasche=nokia@qt-project.org
On Thursday, January 12, 2012 06:50:58 AM ext xizhi@nokia.com wrote:
Hi,
Practically, since Qt Project has
On Wednesday, February 01, 2012 07:37:27 AM ext Kent Hansen wrote:
Hi,
The .ico plugin was originally a Qt Solution, but in Qt 4.4 it was made
part of Qt because QtWebKit needed it.
Does QtWebKit still need it? Does anyone else need it?
In any case, would it be OK to move it to the new
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 09:06:35 AM ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to nominate Girish for Approver status. He's been around Qt for a
pretty long time, working for Trolltech a couple of years ago, then having
his own consultancy company doing Qt related work and he's now back
On Monday, March 12, 2012 02:56:02 PM ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 12 de março de 2012 11.50.17, morten.sor...@nokia.com
wrote:
On Mar 12, 2012, at 11:24 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
Anyway, either way this library will be gone. The most likely solution
is
that we
On Sunday, April 01, 2012 02:37:35 PM ext Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote:
Hi there,
We still are going to ship Qt WebKit1 API as part of the Qt5 module
QtWebKitWidgets (I am not sure the name is final though) so it is a
good idea to upstream I would say. Even things which are related to
Hi,
I would like to nominate Peter for approver status.
As part of the team in the University of Szeged he has completed the past few
rebases of V8 in the qtjsbackend module, a task that is anything but easy,
with a fast moving upstream and a very complex patch set on our side.
Based on his
On Thursday, May 31, 2012 09:04:59 AM ext Alberto Mardegan wrote:
On 05/30/2012 09:28 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
Question: do you believe there is a value in promoting an effort to port
those components here and now?
Yes! While not perfect, these components are working generally well and
having
On Thursday, May 31, 2012 11:47:23 AM ext Laszlo Papp wrote:
Please re-use the existing port of Qt Quick Components to Qt 5 before
starting a new effort.
It is nice to have a branch, but why QtQuick 1.1 usages all around ?
Because we wanted to keep the diff to master as small as possible,
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 09:02:00 AM ext Simon Hausmann wrote:
Hi,
I would like to nominate Peter for approver status.
As part of the team in the University of Szeged he has completed the past
few rebases of V8 in the qtjsbackend module, a task that is anything but
easy, with a fast
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 03:26:35 PM ext Mülner, Helmut wrote:
[...]
The Qt 5 beta is getting closer, and I think we'll have something
releasable within the next two weeks. Technically we have most things in
place, but the sha1's in qt5.git will need to follow and get quite a bit
closer
On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 03:11:37 PM ext haithem rahmani wrote:
Hi Olivier,
thanks for the quick answer.
I want to build the QtWebKit with V8?
is it possible, working?
Nope. We had a few developments towards that but ultimately abandoned those
efforts, largely due to the community
On Friday, August 03, 2012 12:52:08 PM ext David Faure wrote:
This was quite unexpected: in Qt5, creating a QApplication instance triggers
event processing already, much before calling QApplication::exec().
This comes from QWindowSystemInterface::sendWindowSystemEvents calling
On Thursday, August 30, 2012 01:41:42 PM ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
[...]
Now the deed is done and let's move on. But let's make sure it never happens
again.
Sounds right.
I hope everyone also agrees that it's time to celebrate! We've come a bloody
long way since the Alpha.
If we keep up the
On Sunday, September 02, 2012 08:34:24 PM ext Laszlo Papp wrote:
What you're hitting is a bug in qemu while trying to execute mksnapshot,
which is trying to fire up the v8 engine. What's strange though is that
configure should detect that you're building inside scratchbox and disable
v8
Hi,
This is a heads-up regarding the build of WebKit on Windows:
Building WebKit on Windows always comes with the extra difficulty of having to
install build support tools that don't come with the platform. The build makes
heavy use of python and perl for automating the generation of various
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:38:34 AM ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 12 de setembro de 2012 08.51.58, Simon Hausmann wrote:
2) Due to changes in JavaScriptCore's non-JITted code path (1) the
build is also soon going to require an installation of Ruby (2).
Hi
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:58:37 AM João Abecasis wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to nominate Andy Shaw for Approver status. Andy's history
with Qt is longer than my own, having catered to commercial customers
in Trolltech, Nokia and Digia. Looking over the main repositories, I
count 150 commits
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 07:46:57 PM Laszlo Papp wrote:
Can you do what it says?
I have spent a couple of hours with figuring this problem out, and it
seems the following change in qmake has made the build policy about
errors stricter:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,35183
On Thursday, October 04, 2012 10:36:59 AM Mark wrote:
Hi,
The principle is simple. I'd like to be able to make a base component
and create different implementations of it. What i really miss in QML
is the ability to let a component inherit functionality from another
component.
For example
On Friday, September 21, 2012 05:24:16 PM Thiago Macieira wrote:
On sexta-feira, 21 de setembro de 2012 16.47.11, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Include the major version number (5) in all library base names, like on
Windows, on all platforms. On Windows we already have QtCore5.dll and
QtV85.dll,
On Monday, October 08, 2012 02:31:46 PM shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote:
[...]
Another thing you need to consider is named versions.
For example I might have 5.0.0 and 5.0.0-blackberry co-installed.
I think Qt Creator handles this just fine, but the qt --5 examples above
look like it wasn't
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:45:27 AM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
[...]
nope, sorry, the version-based namespacing simply does not belong into
upstream. it's a problem specific to FHS, and should be addressed by
those concerned with it.
It belongs in Qt and people have already
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 04:11:10 PM Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 11 de outubro de 2012 21.16.56, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:56:44AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Considering all the changes I am proposing do NOT harm any of the
people that build
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 08:30:03 AM Thiago Macieira wrote:
[...]
Tor Arne and I have been discussing this once more and we'd like to make an
alternative proposal. But first let's try to summarize.
(1) It seems that there is an agreement on the naming of the libraries and
pkg-config
On Friday, October 19, 2012 02:24:09 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 01:24:37PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote:
(1) It seems that there is an agreement on the naming of the libraries and
pkg-config files.
not really. i'm not as strongly opposed to it as to renaming
On Friday, October 19, 2012 04:16:14 PM Thiago Macieira wrote:
Starting a new thread with some ideas based on the outcomes of the
discussion. Many thanks to rittk, Simon, Lars and André who helped come up
with this.
(and Tor Arne!)
Note: this applies to the *tools* only. The library naming
On Monday, October 22, 2012 07:50:37 AM Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 15.19.57, Simon Hausmann wrote:
I haven't decided whether this tool should be a shell script, a perl
script
or another bootstrapped executable.
I'm inclined to suggest
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 02:32:49 PM Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
On 25/10/12 13:00, Rohan McGovern wrote:
True, there used to be Nokia employees reading every failure report and
chasing up apparently unstable tests, either trying to fix the tests, or
acknowledge them via bug reports and
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 07:39:34 AM Thiago Macieira wrote:
On terça-feira, 30 de outubro de 2012 13.38.03, Hausmann Simon wrote:
Note that qt5.git also contains binaries of bison and win_flex needed by
WebKit. If qtwebkit is built as part of qt5.git then those binaries will
be
used
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 07:38:27 AM Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 31 de outubro de 2012 10.28.12, Simon Hausmann wrote:
Simon: what's the difference between flex and win_flex? Note that
there's
a
flex with msysgit, so if we used flex instead of win_flex, it would make
On Friday, November 16, 2012 04:56:22 PM Christophe Oosterlynck wrote:
Hi,
I’m using Qt 4.x extensively with QtMobility 1.2 and the gstreamer backend.
I was wondering if it is possible to use gstreamer 1.0 instead of 0.10 in
QtMobility or if there are any plans for future versions or in Qt
On Saturday, November 24, 2012 11:09:26 AM Nurmi J-P wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks to QStyleFactory and QProxyStyle, it is possible to instantiate and
customize any available style. This is not limited to the built-in styles
in QtWidgets, but also works fine for any style plugin since it nicely
On Monday, November 26, 2012 10:54:54 PM Thiago Macieira wrote:
Hello
We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git
(Qt 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be in the qt/
hierarchy.
Maybe this is the long awaited return of a now public
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 09:38:24 AM Konstantin Ritt wrote:
OR this could be a result of using QRawFont backdoor :)
That wouldn't explain though why it works on Mac and Linux, no?
There are two code paths in WebKit, a fast text code path and one for complex
text (note how it's not
... pretty please (with a red cherry on top) give everyone a heads-up ahead of
time.
This is the second time within the same week that a source incompatible change
is staged _before_ giving a heads-up. (QStyle subclasses on Monday)
The renaming of QQuickItem::pos() to position() is certainly
On Friday, November 30, 2012 05:38:22 AM Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
I know that branch naming is a possible topic for endless bike shedding.
You can always find arguments against a certain name here. In the end it's
not the
On Friday, December 07, 2012 07:48:44 AM Thiago Macieira wrote:
On sexta-feira, 7 de dezembro de 2012 11.57.06, Ziller Eike wrote:
git://gitorious.org/qtwebkit/qt5-module.git
which is old, unused and deprecated.
Guys, wasn't there some consensus to announce changes that
On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 04:40:50 PM Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
I would also consider an even simpler API. How about we introduce a new
keyword for persistent properties and make it part of the language.
Rectangle {
id: root
persistent property width: 400
persistent
Hi,
QtWebKit requires SQLite for various web related storage mechanism (including
cookies). That dependency is quite old actually, but we've done some changes
now that clean up the way that dependency is satisfied. Ideally should affect
only very few people, but it is quite likely to include
On Thursday, January 03, 2013 09:05:11 AM BogDan wrote:
Hi,
These binaries are built from Android source code, so they are using Apache
license. We need them only to link android platform plugin for API 4,5, and
8. They are not embedded into any Qt binaries, we are only using their
symbols
On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 04:26:47 PM Paul Olav Tvete wrote:
[...]
Edit: and as Maurice says, we can shut down the list when it's no longer
useful.
For clarification: That doesn't mean that the archives are subject to deletion.
Simon
___
Hi all,
Now that Qt 5.0.0 is out I feel that it is a good time to also emphasize show
cases
of Qt and QML as a technology. In Qt 4 we've had a couple of pretty nice demos
in the source code, including a pretty neat demo browser. It serves as a
show-case
for QtWebKit's C++ API and the Qt widgets
Hi,
I would like to nominate Allan to be an approver in the Qt project.
Allan is an expert in WebKit and especially Qt Webkit matters, he's also a
WebKit reviewer. He's also been using Qt for many many years as a seasoned
KDE/khtml developer. As approver he can help with the maintenance and
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 11:40:23 AM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:14:03AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 21 de janeiro de 2013 15.33.59, Knoll Lars wrote:
Finally reading up on some old emails…
I'd say we add the virtual destructors. Better
On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 11:33:29 AM Paul Olav Tvete wrote:
[...]
mkspecs/android-g++/qmake.conf
One suggestion regarding the name of the mkspec:
It's not unusual to have linux* masks in .pro files (at least not in WebKit ;-)
Would it perhaps make sense to rename the mkspec to
On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 02:58:47 AM BogDan wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 11:33:29 AM Paul Olav Tvete wrote:
[...]
mkspecs/android-g++/qmake.conf
One suggestion regarding the name of the mkspec:
It's not unusual to have linux* masks in .pro files (at least
with #ifdefing/profiles?
Great, thanks!
Simon Hausmann wrote:
Let's put it this way: linux-g++* is just as fuzzy as android-g++* in what
it means. But we're not in the business of creating mathematical
formulas, we're in the business of making life easier for software
developers. If we can
On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 04:17:42 AM BogDan wrote:
On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 02:58:47 AM BogDan wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 11:33:29 AM Paul Olav Tvete wrote:
[...]
mkspecs/android-g++/qmake.conf
One suggestion regarding the name of the
Hi,
FYI :)
Simon---BeginMessage---
Hello QtWebKit,
in an effort to reduce the confusion and the hoops needed by users to report
bugs for QtWebKit, issues should now simply be reported in the WebKit
component(s) of the Qt project at https://bugreports.qt-project.org.
There is no need anymore
Hi,
FYI, the QML 2 integration of WebKit is going to require some C++11 support in
the compiler side in the future. As far as I can see this future would be Qt
5.2 at the earliest. Qt 5.0 and Qt 5.1 are not affected at this point.
Simon---BeginMessage---
Hello everyone,
Some time ago we
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:00:09 AM Simon Hausmann wrote:
Hi,
FYI, the QML 2 integration of WebKit is going to require some C++11 support
in the compiler side in the future. As far as I can see this future would
be Qt 5.2 at the earliest. Qt 5.0 and Qt 5.1 are not affected
On Tuesday 23. April 2013 09.46.03 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On terça-feira, 23 de abril de 2013 18.20.11, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
[...]
Change the branch name when the policy changes.
i really wouldn't want to do that.
But you're not offering a better solution either. You're
On Wednesday 15. May 2013 10.55.44 Łukasz Korbel wrote:
Hello!
I want to know what are the plans for QtWebkit for Android? Is it going to
be released in 5.1?
A version of QtWebKit that runs on Android is not going to be part of Qt 5.1.
During the recent WebKit upstream project changes all
On Friday 23. August 2013 09.24.54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Thursday 22 August 2013 22:18:54 Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
On 22.08.2013 21:51, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2013 21:26:15, Antti Kaijanmäki
On Friday 23. August 2013 10.04.35 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 09:48:26 Simon Hausmann wrote:
On Friday 23. August 2013 09.24.54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Thursday 22 August 2013 22:18:54 Antti Kaijanmäki
-project.org/63774
To unsubscribe, visit https://codereview.qt-project.org/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I0a7f4e64497bde423ffa55c705af55cdb7d29cf2
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Project: qt/qtdeclarative
Gerrit-Branch: dev
Gerrit-Owner: Simon Hausmann simon.hausm
On Tuesday 3. September 2013 10.02.52 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Hi there,
Commit 5b9006bbdba7dcab01b8e640554a7d7a4b64f76b in qtbase added move
capability to QScopedPointer.
That means that in Qt 5.2, if you use C++11, you can do this:
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
On Tuesday 3. September 2013 11.44.58 Stephen Kelly wrote:
On Tuesday, September 03, 2013 11:39:58 Simon Hausmann wrote:
Adding a move contructor to QScopedPointer makes no sense, because
moving
means 'escaping the scope', which breaks the fundamental point of
QScopedPointer
On Wednesday 18. September 2013 10.54.52 Sarajärvi Tony wrote:
Hi
We will have a maintenance break on our servers and network services on
Saturday 28th Sep at 08:00 EEST, lasting until Sunday 29th Sep 20:00 EEST.
This might affect your builds, since different parts of the CI infra will be
On Wednesday 18. September 2013 13.38.12 Simon Hausmann wrote:
On Wednesday 18. September 2013 10.54.52 Sarajärvi Tony wrote:
Hi
We will have a maintenance break on our servers and network services on
Saturday 28th Sep at 08:00 EEST, lasting until Sunday 29th Sep 20:00 EEST
Hi,
I'm stepping down as maintainer of QtWebKit in the Qt project and I would like
to propose Allan as new maintainer.
He's a veteran with many years of development and maintenance experience from
KDE, khtml and Qt. He's also the guy responsible for the QtWebKit 2.3 release
for Qt 4.8 - a
On Friday 20. September 2013 12.42.28 Denis Shienkov wrote:
[...]
Thus, I changed the mind and made the decision to remain and continue to
keep the project. So - do not worry! :)
Yay, welcome back :)
Simon
___
Development mailing list
On Monday 21. October 2013 13.33.43 Martin Smith wrote:
The QML parser has callbacks for processing the Import list and for
processing individual imports. In qdoc, I used the one that gets the entire
import list:
virtual bool visit(UiImportList *) { return true; }
virtual bool
On Tuesday 29. October 2013 10.31.16 Felipe Crochik wrote:
summary: some very simple qml code now is taking 4 seconds to parse and
get to the component.onCompleted on android. It is instantaneous using
qml 1.0/old necessitas. What is the best way to profile and found why?
Anybody seeing a much
On Saturday 2. November 2013 11.25.07 Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 02 November 2013, Kevin Krammer wrote:
On Thursday, 2013-10-31, 20:17:43, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
I've got it running
for trivial QML files, however as soon as there are child widgets the
running program
On Tuesday 10. December 2013 12.06.43 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On terça-feira, 10 de dezembro de 2013 19:52:35, Hausmann Simon wrote:
Would it be possible to build libQtQml for i686/SSE2, install it into
lib/sse2 and call it a day? I don't think it's worth shipping a pure i386
version of that
On Wednesday 11. December 2013 09.36.46 Simon Hausmann wrote:
[...]
If we apply the change I mentioned in the other email, we change cases 2
and 3:
2bis) distro builds Qt once with -no-sse2 flags
= all libs compiled without SSE2
= QtQml generates interpreted code only
On Wednesday 11. December 2013 10.12.22 Knoll Lars wrote:
On 11/12/13 10:03, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 11. December 2013 09.36.46 Simon Hausmann wrote:
[...]
If we apply the change I mentioned in the other email, we change
cases 2
and 3
On Thursday 2. January 2014 09.34.21 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
1. In cpp, we typically use enums for numeric constants. In Qt coding
style, enums are in CamelCase.
2. Just a wasting of time. Simply use generated documentation rather than
scroll over the header files (Qt docs are very good, you
On Thursday 9. January 2014 08.05.27 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2014 14:18:56, Knoll Lars wrote:
Hi,
I’d like to nominate a couple of people from the release team for approver
rights. They’ve been working for the last 14 month with our release and CI
On Thursday 9. January 2014 12.58.57 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2014 20:24:47, Knoll Lars wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to continue on filling gaps in our maintainer list and thus want
to propose Simon Hausmann as the new maintainer for QtQml. Guess I don't
need
On Tuesday 14. January 2014 06.02.36 Paaso Matti wrote:
Hi,
All merges are now done, so all changes required for Qt 5.2.1 need
to be pushed to the 'release' branch from now on.
Great, thanks for the merges.
Could you re-enable the stage button in Gerrit for the stable branches,
please?
(removing releasing and other dev subscribed folks from CC)
On Thursday 16. January 2014 12.51.28 Kurt Pattyn wrote:
I would like to propose the QtWebSockets module as a new feature for Qt 5.3
(see https://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground/websockets/source/master)
There are a number of
On Monday 20. January 2014 20.21.14 deDietrich Gabriel wrote:
On Jan 20, 2014, at 7:55 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.com wrote:
On Monday 20 January 2014, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 20 de janeiro de 2014 17:36:26, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
The CI system is still building
On Tuesday 21. January 2014 10.23.22 Sorvig Morten wrote:
On 21 Jan 2014, at 09:32, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote:
On Monday 20. January 2014 20.21.14 deDietrich Gabriel wrote:
On Jan 20, 2014, at 7:55 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.com
wrote:
On Monday 20 January
On Tuesday 21. January 2014 09.32.45 Simon Hausmann wrote:
[...]
I personally like the suggestion brought up elsewhere of keeping things as
they are for Qt 5.3 and dropping 10.6 from the CI system and supported
platforms for 5.3 - while simultaneously reviewing and approving patches by
other
Hi Shane,
On Monday 3. February 2014 22.39.27 Shane McIntosh wrote:
Hi Qt developers!
My name is Shane. I’m a PhD student at Queen’s University in Canada.
I’ve been working on an approach for detecting build hotspots, i.e., files
that not only take a long time to rebuild, but also change
On Monday 17. February 2014 10.46.12 Ulf Hermann wrote:
Sounds good to me. From what I read below, you just add the section about
private headers, right?
Yes.
* If you need to include qt_x11_p.h, always include it as the last
header file.
This could go into the private headers
On Monday 17. February 2014 07.16.12 Heikkinen Jani wrote:
Hi all,
It seems we cannot start merge from dev branch to stable at the moment
because there is still some issues to be solved before that:
1. There seems to be compilation break in dev branch, see
On Thursday 27. February 2014 14.33.56 Robert Knight wrote:
On Windows some older hardware and driver combinations
do not provide a sufficiently well working OpenGL implementation yet they
do have a working DirectX implementation which ANGLE then wraps to
provide an OpenGL ES 2
Hi,
I'd like to nominate Ulf for approvership. He's been hacking on various bits
and pieces in the profiler support in Qml and he also implemented a brand new
profiler for the JavaScript engine.
I'm convinced that he would make a careful and responsible approver.
Patches:
On Wednesday 12. March 2014 12.48.20 Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2014 17:43:35 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
Can you please explain what this feature is about, why do you think
it's useful, how it's supposed to be used, etc.?
On 10 March 2014 17:30, mikhail.svet...@gmail.com
On Thursday 13. March 2014 18.19.15 Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
I'm confusedthe Aura page states:
The goal is to produce a new desktop window manager and shell
environment with modern capabilities.
Are they making a KDE/GNOME equivalent or is this a new UI toolkit i.e
a Qt/Gtk equivalent?
On Monday 24. March 2014 13.12.46 Calogero Mauceri wrote:
http://qt-project.org seems to be down.
Any chance to get it back soon?
It's a known issue and being worked on (is what I was told :)
Simon
___
Development mailing list
On Wednesday 26. March 2014 08.21.20 Alan Ezust wrote:
The README in the qt distribution is confusing to me. I am not sure if it
is consistent with the ./configure --help.
Does anyone understand what the difference is between a qt that is
configured like this: ./configure -developer-build
On Wednesday 26. March 2014 15.05.00 Sean Harmer wrote:
On Wednesday 26 March 2014 15:31:37 Sergio Ahumada wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to nominate Bernd Weimer as approver for the Qt Project.
+1 from me.
+1
Simon
___
Development mailing list
Hi,
We have various parsers in Qt that parse source code and do things with it,
such as the QML parser, the CSS parser and others. We do make the assumption
that their input is UTF-8 encoded and therefore have simply used
QString code = QString::fromUtf8(byteArray);
in some form or other,
On Monday 21. April 2014 15.13.08 Robert Knight wrote:
The design direction is because QML is easier to develop with, more
modern,
and based on OpenGL. Widgets don't have that and will never be as
efficient.
Therefore, the effort is directed towards the technology that has the
On Tuesday 22. April 2014 16.37.06 Thiago Macieira wrote:
Em ter 22 abr 2014, às 14:12:46, Thiago Macieira escreveu:
diff --git a/src/qml/qml/qqmlprivate.h b/src/qml/qml/qqmlprivate.h
Why do we have a public header with private in the name?
It part of the private interface into the type
On Monday 21. April 2014 10.41.52 Christoph Feck wrote:
On Monday 21 April 2014 05:27:33 Joshua Kolden wrote:
I’m curious why you are not interested in QML.
[...]
I see no reason to stay with Qt Widgets at all other than legacy
application support. So what is your concern?
[...]
Not
On Thursday 24. April 2014 11.55.07 Roland Winklmeier wrote:
Hi list,
we discussed the topic whether non-QObject types can be used in QML or not
several times. The last time is only a few days ago as part of the Qt
future discussions. So I had some thoughts what needs to happen to solve
On Thursday 24. April 2014 14.08.03 André Pönitz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:47:50AM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote:
Let's turn this from a blame game into something more productive.
I will simply assume this includes the readiness to re-consider some
of the non-technical decisions
On Monday 28. April 2014 22.01.32 Yang Fan wrote:
QTBUG-38526 is not resolved, it should block the release.
It's being worked on, as you can see if you look into JIRA. The fix is
integrating at this moment.
Have you tested it?
Simon
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Heikkinen Jani
On Tuesday 29. April 2014 07.17.14 Koehne Kai wrote:
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
Behalf Of Andre Ponitz
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 11:34 PM
To: Alan Alpert
On Tuesday 29. April 2014 01.30.24 Dimitar Dobrev wrote:
I don't need invisible inlines either but some of them - such as
QModelIndex::row() - are visible. Is there any way to emit just the visible
inlines?
I think the pinvoke approach of creating bindings just won't work reliably
with
On Tuesday 29. April 2014 10.51.36 Alan Alpert wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Hartmann Thomas
thomas.hartm...@digia.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:34 PM, André Pönitz apoen...@t-online.de
wrote:
I think at least three modifications are inavoidable: For one, things
1 - 100 of 468 matches
Mail list logo
