Re: [Development] Schedule for Qt 4.8.1

2012-02-13 Thread Wolfgang Baron
Hi Turunen Tuukka, could there please be an official VS 2010 64-bit binary release for Microsoft Windows for Qt 4.8.1 onwards? Thanks a lot kind regards, Wolfgang Baron ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt

Re: [Development] QDBus on Windows

2012-04-30 Thread Wolfgang Baron
the right information. thank you for your information. However, that won't help me until Qt5 is around. Am 29.04.2012 23:37, schrieb Wolfgang Baron: Could the Qt project please: 1) include QDBus in the distribution 2) publish the exact procedure how to create Qt as being distributed

Re: [Development] So I've made a QWidgets2 design/prototype... BUT...

2012-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Baron
Hi d3fault, please show us some demo of your code and publish an LGPL project for others to have a look at. Then we can see, whether you've created the next best thing or not. Sure hope, you've got something there! ___ Development mailing list

[Development] New Features in Qt-5.3

2014-02-25 Thread Wolfgang Baron
? Is it cancelled? Kind regards, Wolfgang Baron ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

[Development] WebKit in QtQuick

2014-06-25 Thread Wolfgang Baron
to go away and we will get a nice, tight integration like the QWidget based classes have? - is it possible to access the content in another way from QML? - is tight integration going away altogether in the near future? Thanks for any insights, Wolfgang Baron

Re: [Development] Notes on "Qt Build Systems" @ QtCon 2016

2016-09-05 Thread Wolfgang Baron
I really want to move to QBS, because of its advantages (speed, good dependency tracking, nice syntax, fexibility). However, as long as Qt-Creator keeps generating new projects using qmake templates, I am not so confident in the future of QBS. Also, if QBS is not used for all own projects, my

Re: [Development] syncqt.pl in C++

2017-03-07 Thread Wolfgang Baron
On 7 Mar 2017, at 08:11, Thiago Macieira wrote: There has been no discussion of qbs. Therefore, there is no decision on what to use for Qt 6. It might be cmake or qmake. Then please start that discussion now. Qbs is a secret weapon for all developers trying to do

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Wolfgang Baron
HI, Am 27.04.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Liang Qi: On 27 April 2017 at 22:50, Wolfgang Baron <wolfgang.ba...@gmx.net <mailto:wolfgang.ba...@gmx.net>> wrote: Hi, I would like to see msvc_2017 support on the Windows plattform for any version as soon as possible. That will

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Wolfgang Baron
Hi, I would like to see msvc_2017 support on the Windows plattform for any version as soon as possible. Best regards, Wolfgang Baron ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development