.
Ansel Sermersheim
CopperSpice Cofounder
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On 7/26/15 3:01 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ansel Sermersheim wrote:
We do in fact have a CLA in place. However, our CLA has one single
purpose. In the event that Qt is re-licensed under a BSD style license
(whether due to the KDE Free Qt Foundation or some other reason), we
will re-license
:
On Monday, June 29, 2015 10:51:25 PM Ansel Sermersheim wrote:
There is always CopperSpice the Qt fork which uses C++11. They've
got rid of moc and plan to replace Qt containers with std ones.
Afterwards maybe they will add support for namespaces to their
peppermill source convertor utility.
I
On 7/21/15 3:15 PM, Marc Mutz wrote:
On Tuesday 21 July 2015 22:26:17 Ansel Sermersheim wrote:
As to your question about relicensing, can you please elaborate on what
this is referring to? As long as Qt is covered by the current license,
we can not relicense CopperSpice since we are bound
On 7/21/15 6:23 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Tuesday 21 July 2015 18:10:27 Ansel Sermersheim wrote:
The most common use case of this is creating a QMapQString, X that is
sorted case insensitively. The STL allows this for std::map, and coming
to Qt from a background of standard C++ I
.
We have talked with other developers and read discussions about this for
over a decade. Many members of the larger open source community,
including myself, are not comfortable with this clause.
Ansel Sermersheim
On 7/21/15 10:53 AM, Gunnar Roth wrote:
Hi Ansel.
Am 21.07.2015 um 19:06 schrieb
elaborate on what
this is referring to? As long as Qt is covered by the current license,
we can not relicense CopperSpice since we are bound by the terms of the
licenses under which we forked the code.
Ansel Sermersheim
On 7/21/15 12:36 PM, Marc Mutz wrote:
On Tuesday 21 July 2015 19:53:14 Gunnar
On 7/21/15 11:37 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Tuesday 21 July 2015 10:06:52 Ansel Sermersheim wrote:
We would like to announce our release of CopperSpice 1.1.0. We have
added and changed several things including a modification to to QMap to
user defined comparisons.
As opposed
check out the overview
documentation on our website:
http://www.copperspice.com/docs/cs_overview/index.html
Ansel Sermersheim
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
this is not the
direction Qt is going for many years if at all.
Ansel Sermersheim
CopperSpice Co-Founder
www.copperspice.com
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
to interact with Qt. To a modern C++ programmer this
comes across as a significant limitation.
Ansel Sermersheim
CopperSpice Co-Founder
www.copperspice.com
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo
On 6/30/15 1:01 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Tuesday 30 June 2015 09:37:59 Ansel Sermersheim wrote:
Our goal with CopperSpice is to use modern C++ internally to leverage
everything we can from the language. We want developers of CopperSpice
applications to have the full power of C++ available
On 6/29/15 11:37 PM, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
El Tuesday 30 June 2015, Ansel Sermersheim escribió:
Our September release of CopperSpice will include changes to the
contain library, reimplementation of atomic types, our new changes
to the MetaObject System registration, full API documentation
On 6/29/15 10:59 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday 29 June 2015 22:51:25 Ansel Sermersheim wrote:
I would like to clarify, we did not use anything from the Woboq
blog posting as others have speculated. We had moc removed from
CopperSpice a year earlier than the release of this blog. We
://cppcon.org/2015promo/
Our thanks go out to Trolltech, Nokia, and Digia for all the work they
have done.
Ansel Sermersheim
CopperSpice Co-Founder
www.copperspice.com
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman
15 matches
Mail list logo
