On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 30 de abril de 2013 08.54.31, Samuel Rødal wrote:
A good reason for using the
Foo()
: x(0)
, y(0)
This is extremely ugly and should be discouraged.
If it is about the sum of all
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Axel Waggershauser awag...@gmail.com wrote:
(I went ahead and posted a question on the ANGLE ML asking which
'stable' revision they would suggest to ship with Qt 5.1.)
I got the following reply on the ANGLE ML:
--
Trunk is generally pretty stable unless
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Axel Waggershauser awag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Axel Waggershauser awag...@gmail.com wrote:
(I went ahead and posted a question on the ANGLE ML asking which
'stable' revision they would suggest to ship with Qt 5.1.)
I got
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Axel Waggershauser awag...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on that and without an answer from Oswald which revision is
currently in preparation within the winrt branch, I'd suggest to go
for the latest Chrome related branch, which would be chrome_m27:
http
In light of the recent mentioning of gcc's switch to DWARF4 from
DWARF2 with version 4.8, which should help get down the size of debug
builds, I am very much for giving the 4.8.0 option a try.
Cheers,
Axel
___
Development mailing list
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
qtbase:
ANGLE (*)
If I followed this thread sufficiently, it seems as if no one has yet
made a statement about the update of ANGLE. I just remembered that a
couple of weeks ago I came across this warning
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen
oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:44:13PM +0100, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
P.S. this is not necessarily an offer to do the upgrade myself (I
don't even have enough space to build qt on my windows partition right
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
2 c) if vs. while lines seem obviously inconsistent
if (test == true
1 == 0) // 8 spaces == 4 relative to the '('
This is a special case because of a {
If you write:
if (test == true
With the trailing whitespace issue pretty much fixed, the next step is
eliminating leading tabs. A few questions about that:
1) If in doubt, is it generally fair to assume that whatever
QtCreator's CTRL+i in the default built-in Qt coding style does, is
the way to go?
2) Especially continuation
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:38:31AM +0100, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
I'd say in terms of Lars's worries about having automatic checks in
place before attacking whitespace issues, there should not be any
3. How to best split up patches from that category? e.g. fixing all
if(...){ - if (...) { occurrences in qtbase would be a rather
large patch (I have it half done)
a) split that up based on manageable subdirectories?
yes, and that only for easy recovery from merge conflicts (which you
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen
oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 01:34:54PM +0100, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
I thought splitting by type first and potentially by directory second
if it is too big still, would be best because it reduces the burden
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen
oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote:
it went to the trash because the idea was not liked back then. the winds
appear to have changed meanwhile.
That is a pitty. Given, that I already spent a bunch of hours looking
into this, I hope you are
13 matches
Mail list logo
