Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Nominating Marco Benelli for Approver status

> On Apr 13, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Hunger Tobias > wrote: > > Hello Qt Developers, > > I hereby nominate Marco Benelli for Approver status. He has put in a lot of > effort to maintain the QML code inside Qt Creator over the recent month and in months > fact is

Re: [Development] Qt Keyboard Shortcuts broken in Qt 5.6 (since 4.8 at least). Reproducible test case included.

> On Apr 10, 2016, at 7:22 AM, jaso...@mail-central.com wrote: > > Use of Qt Keyboard shortcuts has been broken in Qt for years. > > There are lots of bugs about it in Qt and KDE projects. > > This one looks close to what I'm seeing, > > Can't assign keyboard shortcut with Meta

Re: [Development] Qt Coding Guidelines

> On Mar 16, 2016, at 20:33, André Somers wrote: > > > > Op 16/03/2016 om 16:14 schreef Koehne Kai: >> Hi there, >> >> We have had quite some discussions about the use of C++11 features and right >> API in the past on this mailing list - but if there has been a

Re: [Development] templated QObjects [was: Re: We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang for parsing C++]

> On Mar 2, 2016, at 11:23 AM, Milian Wolff <milian.wo...@kdab.com> wrote: > > On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 10:14:18 CET Ziller Eike wrote: >>> On Feb 29, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Milian Wolff <milian.wo...@kdab.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Friday, Februa

Re: [Development] templated QObjects [was: Re: We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang for parsing C++]

> On Feb 29, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Milian Wolff wrote: > > On Friday, February 26, 2016 3:56:08 PM CET Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On sexta-feira, 26 de fevereiro de 2016 20:30:28 PST Milian Wolff wrote: The main problems of templated QObject are captured more or less in

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

> On Feb 20, 2016, at 7:04 PM, Thiago Macieira > wrote: > > On sexta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2016 21:01:02 PST Knoll Lars wrote: >> * We drop support for VS2012. This implicitly drops support for WEC2013. >> Reason is that the compiler is still having rather large

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: OSX build requirements for 5.7

> On Feb 10, 2016, at 6:36 PM, Petroules Jake > wrote: > > >> On Feb 10, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Tor Arne Vestbø >> wrote: >> >> On 10/02/16 17:06, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> On quarta-feira, 10 de fevereiro de 2016 12:00:00 PST

Re: [Development] What kind of airplane we want to build?

> On Jan 23, 2016, at 1:12 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote: > > Ziller Eike wrote: >>> I would like that trend to continue. The likely next candidates are >>> threads, futures and locks. >> >> +1 > > I wonder why everyon

Re: [Development] What kind of airplane we want to build?

> On Jan 23, 2016, at 1:47 AM, Thiago Macieira > wrote: > > On Saturday 23 January 2016 01:23:30 Kevin Kofler wrote: >> I feel it's actually TOO rapidly changing. C++11 even threw out C >> compatibility, not only by not adopting all C99 improvements (e.g. VLAs), >>

Re: [Development] What kind of airplane we want to build?

> On Jan 20, 2016, at 3:12 PM, Marc Mutz wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 January 2016 11:48:20 Bubke Marco wrote: >> I think it would be productive for the discussion to build story of what we >> want to do. A story of the big picture. Maybe as a first step we can show >> how we

Re: [Development] Question about QCoreApplicationData::*_libpaths

> On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:40 PM, Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 19:56:38 Mathias Hasselmann wrote: >> Am 19.01.2016 um 15:21 schrieb Ziller Eike: >>>> On Jan 19, 2016, at 16:09, Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> wrote

Re: [Development] Question about QCoreApplicationData::*_libpaths

> On Jan 19, 2016, at 16:09, Marc Mutz wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 14:33:46 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Marc Mutz wrote: >>> I'd aggregate the std container instead of inheriting it, but yes, that's >>> a good

Re: [Development] RFC: QProcess variant or separate class for launching applications "GUI-style"

> On Jan 7, 2016, at 10:14 PM, René J. V. Bertin wrote: > > Sorvig Morten wrote: > >> Another point: Isn't there a fundamental incompatibiity between >> LaunchServices >> and QProcess? LanchServices may ‘activate’ an already running process, while >> QProcess always

Re: [Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Ziller Eike <eike.zil...@theqtcompany.com> wrote: > > >> On Dec 7, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Knoll Lars <lars.kn...@theqtcompany.com> wrote: >> >> On 07/12/15 15:44, "Development on behalf of Marc Mutz" >>

Re: [Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

> On Dec 22, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday 22 December 2015 11:26:40 Ziller Eike wrote: >> We have something similar in Qt: >> >>QString a = "ABC"; >>QString b = "abc"; >>

Re: [Development] New Qt5.6 Beta snapshot available

> On Dec 12, 2015, at 10:22 AM, anton wrote: > > Hi, > > just tested the visualstudio 2015 version on windows. > One thing I noticed: > > In the Designer of a Qt Widgets Application, > the QWebView Widget is missing. > > Are you aware of this? Since QtWebKit is deprecated

Re: [Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

> On Dec 7, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Knoll Lars <lars.kn...@theqtcompany.com> wrote: > > On 07/12/15 15:44, "Development on behalf of Marc Mutz" > <development-boun...@qt-project.org on behalf of marc.m...@kdab.com> wrote: > > > >> On Monday 07 D

Re: [Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

> On Dec 4, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > On Friday 4. December 2015 15:39:01 Curtis Mitch wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of >>> Olivier Goffart >>> Sent: Friday, 4 December 2015

Re: [Development] Proposal to change connectSlotsByName behavior

> On Dec 4, 2015, at 00:05, Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > This message follows an exchange I've had with Thiago on a bug report: >https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-49749 > > > In the current state, QMetaObject::connectSlotsByName() tries to find, >

Re: [Development] could not find or load the Qt platform plugin "cocoa"

> On Oct 28, 2015, at 3:09 PM, Gil Moses wrote: > > Hi, > > I've built Mac universal binaries of v5.5.1 (built separately for i386 and > x86_64, then used lipo). > Built and ran my Qt app (Xcode 5, Mavericks), and got this error: > > . could not find or load the Qt platform

Re: [Development] RFC: Proposal for a semi-radical change in Qt APIs taking strings

> On Oct 16, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Poenitz Andre > wrote: > > > Marc Mutz wrote: >>> I think too we should embrace the standard library more and don't replicate >>> their features. >> >> So you think that QStringView is too experimental and _at the same time_ >>

Re: [Development] RFC: Proposal for a semi-radical change in Qt APIs taking strings

> On Oct 14, 2015, at 5:14 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > > On 2015-10-14 10:30, André Somers wrote: >> Op 14-10-2015 om 15:59 schreef Matthew Woehlke: >>> STL should change. In Qt and Python, you can use negative indices to >>> refer to a distance (length) relative to

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 build issues on OS X : rpath

> On Sep 29, 2015, at 10:27, Jake Petroules > wrote: > > >> On Sep 28, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Thiago Macieira >> wrote: >> >> On Monday 28 September 2015 21:30:33 Massimo Callegari wrote: Can you explain what broke for you? >>> >>>

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 build issues on OS X : rpath

> On Sep 29, 2015, at 10:16, Jake Petroules > wrote: > > >> On Sep 28, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Massimo Callegari >> wrote: >> >> On Monday 28 September 2015 19:09:11 Massimo Callegari wrote: But please guys, when introducing such an

Re: [Development] Qt LTS C++11 plans

On Aug 18, 2015, at 08:49, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On Monday 17 August 2015 23:25:05 Jake Petroules wrote: I haven't a clue why people would bother using old OS X platforms for development, *especially* now that they don't charge for it. Plus I think submitting to

Re: [Development] QtCS: Notes from Modern C++ session

On Jun 16, 2015, at 16:52, Matthew Woehlke mw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On 2015-06-12 17:45, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Friday 12 June 2015 10:49:38 Matthew Woehlke wrote: On Friday 12 June 2015 08:08:51 André Somers wrote: Not available for use are: * = default, * = deleted,

Re: [Development] Compiling for iOS, qtdeclarative and others fail

On May 23, 2015, at 05:03, Ariel Molina ar...@edis.mx wrote: Hi, I solved the problem, just want to share, On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Edward Sutton edward.sut...@subsite.com wrote: I understand the config commands used to build Qt packages are here:

Re: [Development] 5.4.1 OSX macdeployqt FAIL

On May 10, 2015, at 9:08 PM, mark diener rpzrpz...@gmail.com wrote: Well, it looks like the big weakness in OSX deployment is macdeployqt and we are on version 5.4.1+ I was able to change my macdeployqt command line FROM: macdeployqt ./testdep.app/ -qmldir=/macdev/qdev/testdep/

Re: [Development] Qt Creator uses _qt_autotest_force_engine_poller?

On Apr 21, 2015, at 11:46 AM, René J.V. Bertin rjvber...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know I should ask this on the QC ML (but I'd prefer not to sign up for just an occasional question like this): Is there a (good) reason why DocumentManagerPrivate::linkWatcher() forces the use of a

Re: [Development] Removing the -c++11 option from configure

On Mar 21, 2015, at 7:40 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: We'd like to make Qt build unconditionally with the latest version of the C++ standard that is supported by the compiler. That implies removing the -c++11 option so that the -no-c++11 option goes away too.

Re: [Development] Proposal: Deprecating platforms in Qt 5.6 that don't support lambda

On Feb 20, 2015, at 10:04 AM, André Somers an...@familiesomers.nl wrote: Bo Thorsen schreef op 20-2-2015 om 09:03: Andrés question about how this would change the API is a lot more interesting. I so far haven't seen a single case where someone has described how access to lambdas might

Re: [Development] Upgrading the sources to C++11 keywords (Q_NULLPTR, etc.)

On Feb 10, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote: On Tuesday 10 February 2015 08:41:47 Ziller Eike wrote: On Feb 9, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote: On Monday 09 February 2015 09:54:12 Smith Martin wrote: This is the kind of thing we should add

Re: [Development] Upgrading the sources to C++11 keywords (Q_NULLPTR, etc.)

On Feb 9, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote: On Monday 09 February 2015 09:54:12 Smith Martin wrote: This is the kind of thing we should add to the documentation, but can you elaborate? I mean, illustrate the meaning of locality of reference, wildly mixing insertions,

Re: [Development] Deprecating modules with 5.5

On Feb 6, 2015, at 09:21, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@theqtcompany.com wrote: On Friday 6. February 2015 08.42.53 André Somers wrote: Knoll Lars schreef op 5-2-2015 om 16:28: But we don’t have much of a choice, if we want to deliver an up to date web engine. Perhaps it is time to

Re: [Development] Deprecating modules with 5.5

On Feb 3, 2015, at 8:33 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@theqtcompany.com wrote: Hi, I’d like to mark a few modules as deprecated with 5.5, and most likely remove them from the binary packages with 5.6. These modules are: * Qt WebKit As long as WebEngine is not (yet?) a “full replacement of

Re: [Development] qtchooser (was: Re: Adding new third party component three.js to Qt?)

On Jan 18, 2015, at 10:24 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Konstantin Ritt wrote: There is no need for moc/rcc/uic to be suffixed. In fact, they are an internal build tools invoked by qmake and thus they should normally reside in libexec dir (or you may query qmake for its

Re: [Development] qtchooser (was: Re: Adding new third party component three.js to Qt?)

On Jan 18, 2015, at 6:34 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Thiago Macieira wrote: Now we have a legacy to keep, so we can't accept a radical change. Only incremental improvements. You will find that very few deployments out there in the real world use qtchooser. The

Re: [Development] Compiler warnings

On Oct 17, 2014, at 7:26 PM, Mathias Hasselmann math...@taschenorakel.de wrote: Am 17.10.2014 um 18:31 schrieb Thiago Macieira: On Friday 17 October 2014 13:06:39 Milian Wolff wrote: enum Foo { Bar = 1, Baz = 2 }; Foo foo = static_castFoo(3); Now what do you do without a default

Re: [Development] QSettings refactor updates

On Oct 10, 2014, at 8:16 PM, Adam Light acli...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Ziller Eike eike.zil...@theqtcompany.com wrote: On Oct 10, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Adam Light acli...@gmail.com wrote: On the flip side, our large Qt application runs on Mac and Windows

Re: [Development] QSettings refactor updates

On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Morten Johan Sørvig morten.sor...@digia.com wrote: On 10 Oct 2014, at 13:27, Ziller Eike eike.zil...@theqtcompany.com wrote: On Oct 10, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Morten Johan Sørvig morten.sor...@digia.com wrote: Mac people: do we need access to plist files

Re: [Development] osx search paths with 5.3.2

On Oct 13, 2014, at 4:55 PM, Matt Broadstone mbroa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've been using qt 4.8.6 for quite some time on my macbook installed from homebrew with no problem whatsoever. I decided over the weekend to upgrade my install to the latest qt5 build which on homebrew is

Re: [Development] osx search paths with 5.3.2

On Oct 13, 2014, at 5:23 PM, Matt Broadstone mbroa...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Ziller Eike eike.zil...@theqtcompany.com wrote: On Oct 13, 2014, at 4:55 PM, Matt Broadstone mbroa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've been using qt 4.8.6 for quite some time on my

Re: [Development] QSettings refactor updates

On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:48 AM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On Thursday 09 October 2014 19:43:08 Tomaz Canabrava wrote: Please be kind, this is the first step to contributing to qt that I'm trying. :) First, I'v implemented the rationale that thiago asked me to do on the

Re: [Development] QSettings refactor updates

On Oct 10, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Morten Johan Sørvig morten.sor...@digia.com wrote: Mac people: do we need access to plist files? Plist is the format for application and other settings on OS X, and there are native tools for nicely editing these. Ini is highly alien on OS X. So, I’d

Re: [Development] QSettings refactor updates

On Oct 10, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Adam Light acli...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Ziller Eike eike.zil...@theqtcompany.com wrote: On Oct 10, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Morten Johan Sørvig morten.sor...@digia.com wrote: Mac people: do we need access to plist files? Plist

Re: [Development] Qt for iOS: Management Retina vs Non-Retina Images

On Oct 6, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Robert Iakobashvili corobe...@gmail.com wrote: Gentlemen, If images are placed to resource file, is there any option for an automatic management of using either Retina or non-Retina images using Apple's naming convention or the manual management is the only

Re: [Development] Important OSX 10.9.5 10.10 codesign changes

On Oct 7, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Robert Iakobashvili corobe...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Sorvig Morten morten.sor...@digia.com wrote: On 19 Sep 2014, at 11:28, Sorvig Morten morten.sor...@digia.com wrote: This will indeed receive attention in the coming days. There

Re: [Development] Qt for iOS: Management Retina vs Non-Retina Images

On Oct 8, 2014, at 9:18 AM, Robert Iakobashvili corobe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Ziller Eike eike.zil...@theqtcompany.com wrote: On Oct 6, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Robert Iakobashvili corobe...@gmail.com wrote: Gentlemen, If images are placed to resource file

Re: [Development] QUrl setPath Qt4 vs Qt5

Just for completeness ;) https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-27728 On Sep 28, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Samuel Gaist samuel.ga...@edeltech.ch wrote: On 28 sept. 2014, at 03:26, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On Sunday 28 September 2014 01:02:11 Samuel Gaist wrote:

Re: [Development] Direct-lookup translation, even for English (was Re: [Interest] get english translation)

On Sep 2, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Rutledge Shawn shawn.rutle...@digia.com wrote: On 1 Sep 2014, at 8:32 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Monday 01 September 2014 12:50:23 Graham Labdon wrote: Hi My application is internationalized, however, in some circumstances I need the English version of the

Re: [Development] Direct-lookup translation, even for English (was Re: [Interest] get english translation)

This was cross-posted :/ My answer will possibly not end up on the interest mailing list. On Sep 2, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Ziller Eike eike.zil...@digia.com wrote: On Sep 2, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Rutledge Shawn shawn.rutle...@digia.com wrote: On 1 Sep 2014, at 8:32 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote

Re: [Development] Does Qt support customed web browser with self-defined Internet protocols??

On Aug 26, 2014, at 4:02 AM, quinn.wj.xie quinn.wj@gmail.com wrote: Hello, everyone at development@qt-project I have a question and want some suggestions. Right now I am learning Qt programming. And I was wondering if Qt supports a customed web browser. Because our lab is working

Re: [Development] Debug Qt on Mac

On Aug 25, 2014, at 3:09 AM, Jake Petroules jake.petrou...@petroules.com wrote: `export DYLD_IMAGE_SUFFIX=_debug` before running your application. Simple as that. Note that this option will be ignored if DYLD_ROOT_PATH is set. See

Re: [Development] QOptional

On Aug 21, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote: On Thursday 21 August 2014 16:52:05 Thiago Macieira wrote: But I'd like QOptionalQString o = QString() result in a null (disengaged) QOptional too. Why would that be? The optional got a QString value assigned. It shouldn’t

Re: [Development] Qt 4.x and Qt 5 frameworks should use @rpath (QTBUG-31814)

On Aug 12, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Adam Strzelecki o...@java.pl wrote: Okay, Phase II. (1) Introduce bundle_frameworks CONFIG option, and set it default for rpath shared builds on iOS OS X Can we please already now turn a cross-platform hat on, and at least think about options that at least

Re: [Development] Qt 4.x and Qt 5 frameworks should use @rpath (QTBUG-31814)

On Aug 13, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 07:08:45PM -0400, Jake Petroules wrote: On 2014-08-12, at 06:50 PM, Adam Strzelecki o...@java.pl wrote: I agree that such facility should be provided internally while implementing

Re: [Development] Qt 4.x and Qt 5 frameworks should use @rpath (QTBUG-31814)

On Aug 13, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Adam Strzelecki o...@java.pl wrote: Ziller Eike wrote: Can we please already now turn a cross-platform hat on, and at least think about options that at least do not right away block using the same for non-OS X? Sure, this is just a proposition, bundle_qt

[Development] crash when activating timers

For Qt Creator we get the following crash reported: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTCREATORBUG-11262 It seems to happen randomly, on unix (i.e. OS X and Linux) but possibly not on Windows, at least Qt 5.2.1 and later, and the seemingly only person in the Berlin office which also

Re: [Development] crash when activating timers

On Aug 13, 2014, at 5:07 PM, Daniel Teske daniel.te...@digia.com wrote: On Wednesday 13 Aug 2014 08:05:52 Thiago Macieira wrote: On Wednesday 13 August 2014 14:32:13 Ziller Eike wrote: So my question: Does anyone have any idea how this could possibly happen, how we could reproduce

Re: [Development] Qt 4.x and Qt 5 frameworks should use @rpath (QTBUG-31814)

On Aug 11, 2014, at 11:15 PM, Jake Petroules jake.petrou...@petroules.com wrote: On 2014-08-11, at 10:42 AM, Ziller Eike eike.zil...@digia.com wrote: In a terminal session, simply: $ export DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=$DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH:/path/to/Qt/Frameworks $ open /apps/MyApp.app

Re: [Development] Qt 4.x and Qt 5 frameworks should use @rpath (QTBUG-31814)

On Aug 3, 2014, at 12:39 AM, Jake Petroules jake.petrou...@petroules.com wrote: On 2014-08-02, at 05:04 AM, Adam Strzelecki o...@java.pl wrote: Please don't exaggerate the performance implications of copying a few frameworks on the first build (…) This can be done, but discussion is

Re: [Development] Converting types in Qt

On Jul 16, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Poenitz Andre andre.poen...@digia.com wrote: Olivier Goffart wrote: Jędrzej Nowacki wrote: [...] What is wrong with string - int or bytearray - int? At the very least, _implicit_ conversions should not lose data, i.e. a A a1; B b = a1; A a2 = b; round trip

Re: [Development] Converting types in Qt

On Jul 17, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Jędrzej Nowacki jedrzej.nowa...@digia.com wrote: On Thursday 17 of July 2014 13:33:49 Daniel Teske wrote: On Thursday 17 Jul 2014 13:28:10 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote: On Thursday 17 of July 2014 10:51:03 you wrote: QVariant::operator== is not symmetric

Re: [Development] Converting types in Qt

On Jul 17, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Jędrzej Nowacki jedrzej.nowa...@digia.com wrote: On Thursday 17 of July 2014 10:51:03 you wrote: QVariant::operator== is not symmetric QDateTime dateTime = QDateTime::currentDateTime(); QTime time = dateTime.time(); qDebug() (QVariant(dateTime) ==

Re: [Development] Converting types in Qt

On Jul 15, 2014, at 7:36 PM, Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com wrote: On Tuesday 15 July 2014 10:38:52 Poenitz Andre wrote: Olivier Goffart wrote: Jędrzej Nowacki wrote: 1. Are we allowed to add new conversions? The question is tricky because adding a new conversion is a

Re: [Development] Converting types in Qt

On Jul 16, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Jędrzej Nowacki jedrzej.nowa...@digia.com wrote: On Wednesday 16 of July 2014 06:37:25 Ziller Eike wrote: [...] When one use QVariant, it is because we want to enjoy dynamic typing and nice conversions. I don’t think we have a single place in Qt Creator

Re: [Development] Converting types in Qt

On Jul 16, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum kon...@silmor.de wrote: On Wednesday 16 July 2014 08:41:07 Poenitz Andre wrote: Olivier Goffart wrote: It's always a dilemma. We have to look at how likely we are to break applications and I don't think adding a conversion is likely to cause

Re: [Development] Converting types in Qt

On Jul 16, 2014, at 1:30 PM, Jędrzej Nowacki jedrzej.nowa...@digia.com wrote: On Wednesday 16 of July 2014 06:37:25 Ziller Eike wrote: I don’t think we have a single place in Qt Creator where we want automatic conversions when using QVariant. A search for QVariant(Map) returns 5400 hits

Re: [Development] Online installer no longer lets users choose between Qt 5.3.0 and Qt 5.3.1

On Jul 16, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Sze Howe Koh szehowe@gmail.com wrote: On 7 July 2014 19:11, Frederik Gladhorn frederik.gladh...@digia.com wrote: Mandag 7. juli 2014 10.02.55 skrev Ziller Eike: On Jul 7, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Frederik Gladhorn frederik.gladh...@digia.com wrote: Mandag 7. juli

Re: [Development] Converting types in Qt

On Jul 16, 2014, at 5:04 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On Wednesday 16 July 2014 15:01:53 Ziller Eike wrote: No idea what happens in animations, but I’d suppose that any conversions there would be accidentally. QPropertyAnimation is based on modifying QVariants

Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Qt Creator Doesn't Show Error(s)

On Jul 14, 2014, at 1:46 PM, steveg2...@gmail.com wrote: This is from the Application Output widow Have a look at your run configuration in projects mode then, because it looks like you are running mingw32-make.exe when pressing “run” in Qt Creator, instead of your application.

Re: [Development] Support for your evaluation of Qt

On Jul 11, 2014, at 6:21 AM, Christian Gagneraud chg...@gna.org wrote: On 11/07/2014 11:22 a.m., Thiago Macieira wrote: On Friday 11 July 2014 10:05:03 Christian Gagneraud wrote: Boot To Qt for Embedded Linux (Not talking about android here), is based on Yocto (which is open-source), there

Re: [Development] Online installer no longer lets users choose between Qt 5.3.0 and Qt 5.3.1

On Jul 6, 2014, at 3:52 AM, Sze Howe Koh szehowe@gmail.com wrote: On 4 July 2014 00:14, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On Thursday 03 July 2014 10:35:30 Koehne Kai wrote: Right, the files are still there. But to allow parallel installation (which is probably what you

Re: [Development] Online installer no longer lets users choose between Qt 5.3.0 and Qt 5.3.1

On Jul 7, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Frederik Gladhorn frederik.gladh...@digia.com wrote: Mandag 7. juli 2014 07.10.00 skrev Koehne Kai: -Original Message- From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org [...] 1) Developers who face regressions (not just testers) are now in

Re: [Development] Make WebKit an add-on

On Jun 20, 2014, at 8:53 AM, Rutledge Shawn shawn.rutle...@digia.com wrote: On 20 Jun 2014, at 08:32, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote: Hi, Currently Qt WebKit and Qt WebKit Widgets are marked in our documentation as Qt Essentials. I’d like to propose to move them to the add-on

Re: [Development] New class for QtWidgets: ColumnResizer

On Jun 12, 2014, at 6:51 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 04:08:17PM +0200, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: Olivier Goffart wrote: But just wondering if it would not be better to have that as an API within QGridLayout such as

Re: [Development] Bringing Qt's high-dpi support to more platforms

On May 23, 2014, at 6:03 PM, m...@rpzdesign.com wrote: Sorvig: From the latest new front: http://bgr.com/2014/03/18/nexus-9-specs-details/ Digitimes on Tuesday cited its own research arm in reporting that Google will launch two new Nexus tablets in 2014. In addition to an updated

Re: [Development] Perceptions/Understandings of the QML language [was: Question about Qt's future]

On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:12 PM, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Sze Howe Koh szehowe@gmail.com wrote: On 25 April 2014 18:18, Joerg Bornemann joerg.bornem...@digia.com wrote: On 25-Apr-14 04:21, Sze Howe Koh wrote: I consider QML and JavaScript to

Re: [Development] Project ERROR: Could not resolve platform name for SDK 'macosx10.8'

On Apr 7, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Amit Biran am...@waves.com wrote: Hello, I'm trying to build on MacOS any of the Example Qt projects. OSX: 10.8.5 (Mountain Lion) Qt Creator Info: Based on Qt 5.2.1 (Clang 5.0 (Apple), 64 bit) Built on Jan 31 2014 at 06:00:56 Xcode Info:

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt Creator 3.1 RC1 released

On Apr 4, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Tomasz Siekierda sierd...@gmail.com wrote: On 3 April 2014 10:47, List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development annou...@qt-project.org wrote: We are happy to announce the Qt Creator 3.1 RC1 release Blog:

Re: [Development] Branches and time based releases

On Feb 25, 2014, at 6:40 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Em ter 25 fev 2014, às 11:33:00, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu: I.e., nothing changes. I propose this branch stay named dev, for clarity of purpose, not master. i don't think the clarity buys us much. like the rest

Re: [Development] Remove OSX 10.6 Build?

On Jan 26, 2014, at 8:10 PM, Robert Knight robertkni...@gmail.com wrote: In regards to users of Mac OS Qt applications: I’m am extremely confident that more Mac OS applications would be/have been written in Qt, if the priority for native looking widget support was higher. Mac OS users are

Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Qt Creator 3.2 dropping support for Mac OS X 10.6

On Jan 23, 2014, at 7:16 PM, Adam Light acli...@gmail.com wrote: All but one developer at my (smallish) company is still using OSX 10.6.8 because we need 10.6 to be able to build the current shipping version of our main product. We all use Qt Creator, so a Creator 3.2 that would not work on

Re: [Development] Remove OSX 10.6 Build?

On Jan 21, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Tor Arne Vestbø tor.arne.ves...@digia.com wrote: On 21/01/14 13:36 , Sorvig Morten wrote: I realize that if I’m the only one who want’s to keep supporting 10.6 then that’s not going to work. The most important thing to me is to have a somewhat predictable

Re: [Development] How long until clang memory model is ready?

On Jan 22, 2014, at 8:31 PM, Cristian Adam cristian.a...@here.com wrote: On 22.01.2014 19:35, ext Olivier Goffart wrote: Regarding the use of libclang for the code model in Qt creator, there was no progress in a long time. I think the clang code model branch has been merged into master:

Re: [Development] Remove OSX 10.6 Build?

On Jan 21, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Mohamed Fawzi fawzi.moha...@digia.com wrote: On 21 Jan 2014, at 14:25, Jake Petroules jake.petrou...@petroules.com wrote: On Jan 21, 2014, at 7:36 AM, Sorvig Morten morten.sor...@digia.com wrote: On 21 Jan 2014, at 11:51, Simon Hausmann

Re: [Development] Remove OSX 10.6 Build?

On Jan 21, 2014, at 3:15 PM, Sorvig Morten morten.sor...@digia.com wrote: On 20 Jan 2014, at 21:21, deDietrich Gabriel gabriel.dedietr...@digia.com wrote: The truth is, market share doesn’t mean anything. Point in case: According to the link above, OS X is less than 8% of the total market

Re: [Development] Debugging into Qt binaries

On Jan 11, 2014, at 5:55 AM, Kuba Ober k...@mareimbrium.org wrote: On Jan 10, 2014, at 6:07 AM, Ziller Eike eike.zil...@digia.com wrote: On Jan 9, 2014, at 6:05 PM, Kuba Ober k...@mareimbrium.org wrote: I’m trying to figure out the most constructive way of ensuring that an OS X build

Re: [Development] Debugging into Qt binaries

On Jan 9, 2014, at 6:05 PM, Kuba Ober k...@mareimbrium.org wrote: I’m trying to figure out the most constructive way of ensuring that an OS X build of Qt, installed with the source code, can be actually debugged by stepping into the C++ source code in the Qt library. So far I can only step

Re: [Development] The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil statement in Qt sources

On Dec 18, 2013, at 5:35 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezme...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I would like to now if it's acceptable for the project to have 3rd party code with the following statement in 3rd party sources: The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil” Does it come

Re: [Development] Dropping XP?

On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Jonathan Liu net...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 December 2013 18:34, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote: -Original Message- From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On

Re: [Development] Dropping XP?

On Dec 11, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Jonathan Liu net...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/12/2013 8:03 PM, Ziller Eike wrote: On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Jonathan Liu net...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 December 2013 18:34, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote: -Original Message- From: development

Re: [Development] Qt Creator and External Library

On Dec 9, 2013, at 9:02 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On segunda-feira, 9 de dezembro de 2013 20:19:55, Comp wrote: I created a QMake project in Qt Creator and added an external library (POCO), autocompletion seem to work, but then when compiling I get the error

Re: [Development] OpenGL drivers

On Nov 30, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Mark Gaiser mark...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On sexta-feira, 29 de novembro de 2013 12:27:44, Sletta Gunnar wrote: So, I'm asking that if you encounter issues with flickering, crashes, bad

Re: [Development] OpenGL drivers

On Dec 2, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On segunda-feira, 2 de dezembro de 2013 14:26:29, Thomas Hartmann wrote: Hi, yes, this was a conscious decision. Does it create usability issues for you? Usability? That's debatable. My eyesight is still pretty

Re: [Development] Qt SDK for Mac OS X (was: New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172)

On Nov 27, 2013, at 9:28 PM, Adam Strzelecki o...@java.pl wrote: So that would always contain the Qt sources, documentation and examples too? Yes, Kai wrote he sees no point to be able to not install docs examples together with SDK as suggested in QTBUG-34870. So once Qt Creator isn’t

Re: [Development] Qt SDK for Mac OS X (was: New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172)

On Nov 28, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Adam Strzelecki o...@java.pl wrote: There are other installers though, either from Digia, or other companies (enterprise Qt packages, SailfishOS SDK, …) which have other requirements. Meaning that we need to have some kind of Qt installers for Mac anyhow.

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 RC1 candidate packages available

On Nov 28, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Heikkinen Jani jani.heikki...@digia.com wrote: Hi all, We have finally Qt 5.2 RC1 candidate packages available in http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.2/5.2.0-rc1/2013-11-28_179/ . Mirroring is ongoing so it is possible that all packages aren’t

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot available

On Nov 27, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Ola Røer Thorsen o...@silentwings.no wrote: Hi, maybe QtCreator should be added to the test report form? It has entries for Designer and Assistant already. I'm not able to run QtCreator from this snapshot. Bug report here,

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Adam Strzelecki o...@java.pl wrote: Jake Petroules wrote: But what exactly do you include in the offline installer? Thanks for detailed insight. I think I am all way with /Applications/Qt Creator.app/Contents/SDKs/{mkspec}-{version}.qtsdk/ because of simple

  1   2   >