Hi,
On 09/21/2015 02:04 PM, Andreas Holzammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 21.09.2015 um 12:49 schrieb Knoll Lars:
>
>> I’d only like to get a confirmation from the WEC maintainers, that they
>> are ok with this plan as well.
> So for WEC angle is not build nor used. As on WEC Direct X would be
> build
Hi Andrew,
This sounds like a solid plan. For 5.6, we probably don’t have any other
choice than staying with what we have now.
For 5.7, the desktop this sounds ok IMO. I actually don’t think we need to
(or should) support VS2012 there at all.
I’d only like to get a confirmation from the WEC
Hi,
Am 21.09.2015 um 12:49 schrieb Knoll Lars:
> I’d only like to get a confirmation from the WEC maintainers, that they
> are ok with this plan as well.
So for WEC angle is not build nor used. As on WEC Direct X would be
build with OpenGL ES2 and yeah angle then would do it the other way
On Monday 21 September 2015 12:50:26 Andrew Knight wrote:
> while Qt 5.7 will only support VS2013 and newer (as
> well as recent versions of MinGW, but that is tangential to this
> discussion).
The minimum version of VS for Qt 5.6 is 2012, not 2013, but like Lars said,
people using 2012 still
On Monday 21 September 2015 08:28:13 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday 21 September 2015 12:50:26 Andrew Knight wrote:
> > while Qt 5.7 will only support VS2013 and newer (as
> > well as recent versions of MinGW, but that is tangential to this
> > discussion).
>
> The minimum version of VS for
Hello,
tl;dr: I propose that the copy of ANGLE currently in the 5.6 branch of
qtbase be maintained without being upgraded for the next minor release
of Qt (5.6). For Qt 5.7 and beyond, we should upgrade ANGLE from
upstream while dropping support for VS2010 and VS2012.
Around each minor Qt
