On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 14:02:36 PST Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
wrote:
> QDirIterator, QRegularExpressionMatchIterator, (private) QStringIterator
> and similar don't have replacements yet.
>
> Yes, one can wrap a Java iterator back into a range API (as I've done
> for QREMI, so you
Hello,
Il 05/12/23 22:15, Mathias Hasselmann via Development ha scritto:
would QDirIterator[1] be part of this deprecation? Its API clearly seems
be inspired by the Java-style iterators.
While I do not care much about the other Java-style iterators, I really
like this iterator and use it a
side QtCreator.
Jarek
From: Development on behalf of Andreas
Aardal Hanssen
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 10:26 PM
To: Qt Development
Subject: Re: [Development] Future of java-style iterators?
How about QDir::iterator, QDir::cbegin, basically make
How about QDir::iterator, QDir::cbegin, basically make QDir a container? Or
make a new class that serves the same purpose… /me likes the QDir idea.. :-)
Andreas
Tir 5 des 2023 kl. 22:15 skrev Mathias Hasselmann via Development:
> Hi,
>
> would QDirIterator[1] be part of this deprecation? Its
Hi,
would QDirIterator[1] be part of this deprecation? Its API clearly seems
be inspired by the Java-style iterators.
While I do not care much about the other Java-style iterators, I really
like this iterator and use it a lot.
What would be this iterator's modern replacement in Qt?
Ciao
On 05.12.23 10:06, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote:
> Il 05/12/23 03:52, Kevin Kofler via Development ha scritto:
>> Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
>>> Until then, either you want to be notified of sub-optimal APIs asap,
>> What is "suboptimal" about Java-style iterators, other than that
Il 05/12/23 03:52, Kevin Kofler via Development ha scritto:
Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
Until then, either you want to be notified of sub-optimal APIs asap,
What is "suboptimal" about Java-style iterators, other than that they do not
work the same way as the STL ones? I find the
Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
> Until then, either you want to be notified of sub-optimal APIs asap,
What is "suboptimal" about Java-style iterators, other than that they do not
work the same way as the STL ones? I find the Java-style iterators to be
easier to use and less error-prone than
Fair enough, as long as they are not removed anytime soon
> Marc Mutz via Development kirjoitti 4.12.2023
> kello 10.20:
>
> On 04.12.23 09:06, Jyrki Yli-Nokari wrote:
>>
>> While I do not use them, I feel that deprecating such core functionality of
>> a framework without measurable gain
On 04.12.23 09:06, Jyrki Yli-Nokari wrote:
>
> While I do not use them, I feel that deprecating such core functionality of a
> framework without measurable gain would seriously harm anyone using them and,
> most importantly, fundamentally harm the promise and dependability of Qt as a
>
While I do not use them, I feel that deprecating such core functionality of a
framework without measurable gain would seriously harm anyone using them and,
most importantly, fundamentally harm the promise and dependability of Qt as a
framework of choice.
> Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
Hello,
On 03/12/2023 21:56, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
Some days ago we got an error report in the forum about QHashIterator,
turned out to be a missing documentation for a complete class which
remained unnoticed since Qt 6.0
(https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-119461).
This leads to the
Hi,
Some days ago we got an error report in the forum about QHashIterator,
turned out to be a missing documentation for a complete class which
remained unnoticed since Qt 6.0
(https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-119461).
This leads to the question if we should deprecate all java-style
13 matches
Mail list logo
