On 23 Nov 2012, at 11:20, Peter Hartmann phartm...@rim.com wrote:
On 11/23/2012 11:11 AM, Poenitz Andre wrote:
Peter Hartmann wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
(...)
The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in
practice. Vendors of binary Qt based
23.11.2012, 14:07, Peter Hartmann phartm...@rim.com:
This situation is different on mobile (and I guess embedded as well);
On embedded you usually can rebuild all software when changing Qt, so
binary compatibility is not important.
--
Regards,
Konstantin
-Original Message-
[mailto:development-bounces+tvaneerd=rim@qt-project.org] On Behalf
Of Ziller Eike
On 23 Nov 2012, at 11:20, Peter Hartmann phartm...@rim.com wrote:
Do you intend to upgrade this version of Qt that's installed on the
device
without upgrading the
On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
(...)
The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in
practice. Vendors of binary Qt based application typically test their
setup against one specific (often enough patched) version of Qt which
is then shipped with the application.
Peter Hartmann wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
(...)
The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in
practice. Vendors of binary Qt based application typically test their
setup against one specific (often enough patched) version of Qt which
is then
On 11/23/2012 11:11 AM, Poenitz Andre wrote:
Peter Hartmann wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
(...)
The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in
practice. Vendors of binary Qt based application typically test their
setup against one specific (often enough
