Re: [Development] binary compatibility promise (was: Re: Frameworks on Mac?)

2012-11-27 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
23.11.2012, 14:07, Peter Hartmann phartm...@rim.com: This situation is different on mobile (and I guess embedded as well); On embedded you usually can rebuild all software when changing Qt, so binary compatibility is not important. -- Regards, Konstantin

[Development] binary compatibility promise (was: Re: Frameworks on Mac?)

2012-11-23 Thread Peter Hartmann
On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote: (...) The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in practice. Vendors of binary Qt based application typically test their setup against one specific (often enough patched) version of Qt which is then shipped with the application.

Re: [Development] binary compatibility promise (was: Re: Frameworks on Mac?)

2012-11-23 Thread Poenitz Andre
Peter Hartmann wrote: On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote: (...) The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in practice. Vendors of binary Qt based application typically test their setup against one specific (often enough patched) version of Qt which is then