On Monday 13 January 2014 22:00:53 abba...@gmail.com wrote:
But I think maybe we should get the C++ APIs into qtbase, so that
QtQuick.Controls.FileDialog doesn't depend on qtsystems.
Let me rewind a bit here... I thought QtCore would have query stuff, not mount
functionality - which most
On 13 Jan 2014, at 8:06 PM, David Faure wrote:
On Monday 13 January 2014 22:00:53 abba...@gmail.com wrote:
But I think maybe we should get the C++ APIs into qtbase, so that
QtQuick.Controls.FileDialog doesn't depend on qtsystems.
Let me rewind a bit here... I thought QtCore would have
Here are the QDrive APIs that Tony mentioned below:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,75336,patchset=1
Regards,
Alvin
From: Иван Комиссаров [abba...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 3:49 PM
To: Tony Van Eerd
Cc: Константин Ритт; Matt Broadstone;
On 13 Jan 2014, at 5:06 PM, Alvin Yulo wrote:
Here are the QDrive APIs that Tony mentioned below:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,75336,patchset=1
Cool.
But I think maybe we should get the C++ APIs into qtbase, so that
QtQuick.Controls.FileDialog doesn't depend on qtsystems. So
On 13 Jan 2014, at 5:06 PM, Alvin Yulo wrote:
Here are the QDrive APIs that Tony mentioned below:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,75336,patchset=1
Cool.
But I think maybe we should get the C++ APIs into qtbase, so that
QtQuick.Controls.FileDialog doesn't depend on
1) well, it can go to qt base, but what module? We can't add mount and monitor
to qtcore, because Linux implementation will require dbus.
2) separate, see above. Drive info should belong to qt core, IMHO.
Иван Комиссаров
13 янв. 2014 г., в 21:53, Tony Van Eerd tvane...@blackberry.com
1) well, it can go to qt base, but what module? We can't add mount and
monitor to qtcore, because Linux implementation will require dbus.
I'm not familiar with the details there, can you briefly explain why dbus is
necessary and why it is a bad thing for qtcore?
2) separate, see above.
On segunda-feira, 13 de janeiro de 2014 18:04:24, Tony Van Eerd wrote:
1) well, it can go to qt base, but what module? We can't add mount and
monitor to qtcore, because Linux implementation will require dbus.
I'm not familiar with the details there, can you briefly explain why dbus is
On Monday 13 January 2014 18:04:24 Tony Van Eerd wrote:
1) well, it can go to qt base, but what module? We can't add mount and
monitor to qtcore, because Linux implementation will require dbus.
I'm not familiar with the details there, can you briefly explain why dbus is
necessary and why
I think, mount requires root privileges, doesn't it?
Not sure about libudev, maybe it can be used from userspace...
Иван Комиссаров
13 янв. 2014 г., в 22:17, David Faure david.fa...@kdab.com написал(а):
On Monday 13 January 2014 18:04:24 Tony Van Eerd wrote:
1) well, it can go to qt base,
On Monday, January 13, 2014 10:32:12 PM abba...@gmail.com wrote:
I think, mount requires root privileges, doesn't it?
Not if the entry is present in fstab, with the option user or users.
--
David Faure | david.fa...@kdab.com | Managing Director KDAB France
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group
On 2014-01-13, David Faure david.fa...@kdab.com wrote:
Mounting can still be done with `mount`, no?
Only in rare cases. Normally on linux from a user app you would call out
to udisks, who would connect to polkit and have polkit maybe query you
and other magic.
Notifications mean listening to
2014/1/13 David Faure david.fa...@kdab.com
On Monday, January 13, 2014 10:32:12 PM abba...@gmail.com wrote:
I think, mount requires root privileges, doesn't it?
Not if the entry is present in fstab, with the option user or users.
Still, what about volumes (|un)mounting of which requires
On Monday, 2014-01-13, 22:00:53, abba...@gmail.com wrote:
1) well, it can go to qt base, but what module? We can't add mount and
monitor to qtcore, because Linux implementation will require dbus.
I think this will come up again and again until there is a QPA like platform
adapter on the
On segunda-feira, 13 de janeiro de 2014 21:28:05, Kevin Krammer wrote:
D-Bus simply is *the* system integration technology on Linux, QtCore will
need to be able to do D-Bus at runtime.
That will always require plugins.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect
On Monday, 2014-01-13, 12:37:54, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 13 de janeiro de 2014 21:28:05, Kevin Krammer wrote:
D-Bus simply is *the* system integration technology on Linux, QtCore will
need to be able to do D-Bus at runtime.
That will always require plugins.
Yes, but QPA
On segunda-feira, 13 de janeiro de 2014 21:48:22, Kevin Krammer wrote:
The alternative to platform plugins is to put all those IPC basics into
QtCore itself, like what was done for PPS. I.e. moving parts of QtDBus
into QtCore.
We could do that, though I'd rather not. The basics for kdbus will
On 1 Mar 2013, at 11:20 PM, Lorn Potter wrote:
On 02/03/13 07:59, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On sábado, 2 de março de 2013 07.51.04, Lorn Potter wrote:
Wasn't there already similar functionality in QtMobility?
QSystemStorageInfo seems to provide similar functionality?
Yes it does.
Or did
There was some work going on inside BlackBerry to revamp QSystemStorageInfo.
Last version I saw had:
QDrive:
- similar to QDir (not a QObject!).
- construct from URI/path (ie dev/sda1 or D:\)
- mount/unmount/is-it-mounted/list-of-mount-points/etc
- total/available space
QDriveWatcher:
-
On Friday, January 10, 2014, Tony Van Eerd wrote:
There was some work going on inside BlackBerry to revamp
QSystemStorageInfo. Last version I saw had:
QDrive:
- similar to QDir (not a QObject!).
- construct from URI/path (ie dev/sda1 or D:\)
-
https://codereview.qt-project.org/73945
Regards,
Konstantin
2014/1/10 Matt Broadstone mbroa...@gmail.com
On Friday, January 10, 2014, Tony Van Eerd wrote:
There was some work going on inside BlackBerry to revamp
QSystemStorageInfo. Last version I saw had:
QDrive:
- similar to QDir
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/73945
I looked at this, but it lacks the extra functionality that Tony indicates
is in their classes. Specifically, not just info about the drive/device,
but the ability to mount/unmount
2014/1/10 Matt Broadstone mbroa...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.comwrote:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/73945
I looked at this, but it lacks the extra functionality that Tony indicates
is in their classes. Specifically, not just info about
We will put up our stuff into a review next week. Currently it is mostly
header/API only, no implementation files. We are just trying to get the API
designed.
We looked at QDriveInfo (either that one or similar one of the same name) and,
basically, stole many ideas from it. Ours was also
I also had a drive monitor class
https://gitorious.org/qdrive/qdrive/source/bf9f993ec64781534169a7ac630632805ef34374:src/driveinfo/qdrivecontroller.h
but it needs a bit polishing
Иван Комиссаров
11 янв. 2014 г., в 0:28, Tony Van Eerd tvane...@blackberry.com написал(а):
We will put up our
25 matches
Mail list logo
