Re: [Development] Do QtQuick.Layouts depend on QtQuick.Controls?

2014-12-10 Thread Saether Jan-Arve
Yes, for app development they are independent. They didn't even have to live in the same repository, but since they are usually used together we chose to have them in the same repo. That makes it easier to catch bugs earlier and to make sure that Controls and Layouts always cooperate properly.

[Development] ARM GDB with Python support for Windows host

2014-12-10 Thread Denis Shienkov
Hi all. I trying to build a GDB (with python suport) for the ARM target on Windows host (with MinGW/MSYS), but without of result. It is failed on libiconv v1.14 building (a wrong -DINSTALLDIR escaping without quotes in libcharset sub-dir). I use this WIKI:

Re: [Development] Do QtQuick.Layouts depend on QtQuick.Controls?

2014-12-10 Thread Dmitry Volosnykh
Thanks for your clarification, guys. Saether, I have noticed that almost everywhere in documentation these modules are referred together, That is what was leading me to a premature conclusion about dependency. So, it happens to be some kind of semantic dependency, not binary/linker one. Any

[Development] Quick implementation of Material components

2014-12-10 Thread 姜柏任
Hi all, It has been a while since I followed Qt mailing list last time, but I noticed that folks at Digia is working on an Android Material Design port of QtQuick controls. We've hacked a set of PoC Material components last month at MOPCON http://mopcon.org/2014/ 2014; not sure if it helps, but

Re: [Development] Do QtQuick.Layouts depend on QtQuick.Controls?

2014-12-10 Thread Saether Jan-Arve
There is no need to change config files. Just type make module-qtquickcontrols from the meta repo. That should make QtQuick Controls + QtQuick Layouts + all dependent libraries. IMHO, QtQuick Layouts (+Controls) are available by default, and if you don't need QtQuick Controls on your device,

Re: [Development] Do QtQuick.Layouts depend on QtQuick.Controls?

2014-12-10 Thread Nurmi J-P
On 10 Dec 2014, at 10:47, Dmitry Volosnykh dmitry.volosn...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your clarification, guys. Saether, I have noticed that almost everywhere in documentation these modules are referred together, That is what was leading me to a premature conclusion about dependency.

[Development] [Announce] Qt 5.4 released

2014-12-10 Thread List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development
Hi everybody, Qt 5.4 has just been released. For details check the blog post at http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/12/10/qt-5-4-released/ In addition to Qt 5.4, we also released Qt Creator 3.3, see http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/12/10/qt-creator-3-3-0-released/ And a new version of Qt for

Re: [Development] ARM GDB with Python support for Windows host

2014-12-10 Thread Denis Shienkov
Oops, now all builds without errors. Just need to use make.exe from MSYS, instead of mingw32-make from MinGW. It is my stupid mistake. 2014-12-10 12:31 GMT+03:00 Denis Shienkov denis.shien...@gmail.com: Hi all. I trying to build a GDB (with python suport) for the ARM target on Windows host

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

2014-12-10 Thread Uwe Rathmann
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 08:58:57 +, Heikkinen Jani wrote: We have Qt5.4.0 final packages available for your testing here: Tried to build from the source tarballs on my OpenSuSE 13.1 box, but after some while my make runs into pkg-config issues. Well maybe my system is not properly set up for

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

2014-12-10 Thread Hausmann Simon
Yeah, that's an unfortunate bug that slipped in. It is documented as a known issue and tracked in ‎QTBUG-43205 Simon Original Message From: Uwe Rathmann Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 12:14 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

Re: [Development] ARM GDB with Python support for Windows host

2014-12-10 Thread Ray Donnelly
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Denis Shienkov denis.shien...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all. I trying to build a GDB (with python suport) for the ARM target on Windows host (with MinGW/MSYS), but without of result. It is failed on libiconv v1.14 building (a wrong -DINSTALLDIR escaping without

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

2014-12-10 Thread Uwe Rathmann
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:20:17 +, Hausmann Simon wrote: Yeah, that's an unfortunate bug that slipped in. It is documented as a known issue and tracked in ‎QTBUG-43205 According to http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt540-KnownIssues I had the impression, that installing dbus headers would fix the

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

2014-12-10 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Wednesday 10. December 2014 12.05.26 Uwe Rathmann wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:20:17 +, Hausmann Simon wrote: Yeah, that's an unfortunate bug that slipped in. It is documented as a known issue and tracked in ‎QTBUG-43205 According to http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt540-KnownIssues I

[Development] Is the online repository ready for Qt 5.4?

2014-12-10 Thread Sze Howe Koh
Hi all, I'm trying to upgrade to Qt 5.4 and Qt Creator 3.3 using the online installer. However, when I select Update components or Package manager, the installer gets stuck at Preparing meta information download... Looking at

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

2014-12-10 Thread Uwe Rathmann
Hallo Simon, The easiest workaround is to get pkg-config to work for you. well pkg-config is not broken, because I did something specific on my box, it is the distro itself, that doesn't seem to provide a valid pkg- config system. Maybe it is OpenSuSE 13.1 only, but it could also be an issue

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

2014-12-10 Thread Uwe Rathmann
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:47:33 +0100, Simon Hausmann wrote: Oh, and the fourth option is to disable dbus with -no-dbus, but I don't know if your setup allows for that :) dbus is indeed not necessary for almost all of my use cases and I started trying this option. Now it took me to: make[5]:

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

2014-12-10 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Wednesday 10. December 2014 14.22.52 Uwe Rathmann wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:47:33 +0100, Simon Hausmann wrote: Oh, and the fourth option is to disable dbus with -no-dbus, but I don't know if your setup allows for that :) dbus is indeed not necessary for almost all of my use cases

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

2014-12-10 Thread R. Reucher
On Wednesday 10 December 2014 17:14:19 Simon Hausmann wrote: On Wednesday 10. December 2014 13.26.57 Uwe Rathmann wrote: The easiest workaround is to get pkg-config to work for you. well pkg-config is not broken, because I did something specific on my box, it is the distro itself, that

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

2014-12-10 Thread Uwe Rathmann
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:13:31 +0100, Simon Hausmann wrote: Yeah, configure should check for that and skip the kms plugin build if it can't find it via pkg-config - that seems like a bug. But everything what is needed is available on my system - it's only, that the build doesn't find it. With

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

2014-12-10 Thread Uwe Rathmann
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:14:19 +0100, Simon Hausmann wrote: ( What raises the question, why configure comes to the conclusion to enable pkg-config on my box ). Even though you passed -no-pkg-config you mean? No, without any option: By default, configure determines whether to use pkg-config

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

2014-12-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday 10 December 2014 12:05:26 Uwe Rathmann wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:20:17 +, Hausmann Simon wrote: Yeah, that's an unfortunate bug that slipped in. It is documented as a known issue and tracked in ‎QTBUG-43205 According to http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt540-KnownIssues I

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

2014-12-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday 10 December 2014 17:00:49 Uwe Rathmann wrote: By default, configure determines whether to use pkg-config or not with some heuristics ... Yeah, I'm fixing that for 5.5. The logic is hard to understand, since the -pkg- config option may not enable fully. -- Thiago Macieira -

Re: [Development] QTBUG-36811. Qml date behaves unexpectedly for negative years.

2014-12-10 Thread Valery Kotov
Dear Thiago and Ulf, Thank you for your responses. @Ulf Ulf, thank you for pointing at related bug. It seems to me that you've already fix the issue, haven't you? Is it correct that the solution is to add 1 year to qml date object when the year is less than 0? On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM,

[Development] Enabling of QtDBus in Qt 5.4 and 5.5

2014-12-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
Dear all My well-intentioned changes to unbreak the building of the OS X builds for 5.4.0 have apparently had unexpected consequences. After reviewing the situation, I've created https://codereview.qt-project.org/101843 to fix the issues (note: updates for Windows pending). Once that one is in

Re: [Development] Enabling of QtDBus in Qt 5.4 and 5.5

2014-12-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday 10 December 2014 17:42:06 Thiago Macieira wrote: Explanation: * runtime: dynamically open libdbus-1 at runtime * linked: link to libdbus-1 * configure1: check at configure time if libdbus-1 is present in the system and then enable runtime mode * configure2: check at

Re: [Development] Enabling of QtDBus in Qt 5.4 and 5.5

2014-12-10 Thread Kurt Pattyn
On 11 Dec 2014, at 08:30, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On Wednesday 10 December 2014 17:42:06 Thiago Macieira wrote: Explanation: * runtime: dynamically open libdbus-1 at runtime * linked: link to libdbus-1 * configure1: check at configure time if libdbus-1 is