On 1/9/17, 10:54 AM, "Development on behalf of Oswald Buddenhagen"
wrote:
>i had a quick look at the repo:
>- there is still copy of moc's c++ parser in there. not much to do about
> it at this
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:50:52PM +, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) wrote:
> As the maintainer for the Qt Remote Objects (QtRO) playground project,
> I would like to officially request moving it from a playground project
> to a Qt project.
>
i had a quick look at the repo:
- there is still copy
I observed:
>> Issue: Q(Date|Time)+ think day-changes happen at midnight. [...] Has
>> secular society shifted the day boundary to midnight in practice ?
Soroush replied:
> Indeed they do the simplification needed to adopt modern lifestyle.
OK, good - then we have an excuse to keep the simple
As the maintainer for the Qt Remote Objects (QtRO) playground project, I would
like to officially request moving it from a playground project to a Qt project.
For now (Qt 5.9), I’d like to keep it as a Tech Preview, as there are some
elements of the API we would still like to extend, and we’d
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-
> bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Samuel Gaist
> Sent: Sunday, 8 January 2017 23:44
> Is there any rule/filter that are applied on the bug reports related to the
> actions
> made available ?
>
Hi,On 9 Jan 2017, at 09:21, Alexander Blasche wrote:Hi,-Original Message-From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Samuel GaistSent: Sunday, 8 January 2017 23:44Is there any rule/filter that are applied on
On 09/01/2017 08:21, Alexander Blasche wrote:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Development [mailto:development-
bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Samuel Gaist
Sent: Sunday, 8 January 2017 23:44
Is there any rule/filter that are applied on the bug reports