Il 01/03/21 14:25, Lars Knoll ha scritto:
First of all, you can now find a ‘Precheck' button in gerrit. That button
triggers a full CI test run of the Sha1 in the change and will post back the
result of that run as a comment. This should make it a lot easier to test some
of your changes
Am 01.03.21 um 14:25 schrieb Lars Knoll:
Hi all,
While the CI maintenance break today took a little longer than usual, it also
came with two very nice new features that will hopefully make everybody’s life
easier.
First of all, you can now find a ‘Precheck' button in gerrit. That button
On 3/1/21 10:03 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote:
Can fixqt4headers.pl be removed from Qt6?
Seems sane to me.
One less perl script ...
Here we go: https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/336822
Cheers,
Joerg
___
Development mailing list
Joerg Bornemann (26 February 2021 16:07)
> I noticed that we still have fixqt4headers.pl in our bin directory.
> For the uninitiated, this is it's documentation:
> https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/portingcppapp.html
>
> That page is already gone in Qt6.
>
> Can fixqt4headers.pl be removed from Qt6?
Seems
Hi,
It seems that 6 hours was not enough, so maintenance break is still ongoing
with no estimated time of completion. We will let you know when it is done.
VP
From: Ville-Pekka Karhu
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 3:55 PM
To: Qt development mailing list
On 01/03/2021 11:45, Fabian Kosmale wrote:
currently we promise that if for a type its QMetaType does not have the
NeedsConstruction flag set, it can be initialized with memzero. We set that
flag if the type is complex according to QTypeInfo. However, after the
discussion
Hi,
currently we promise that if for a type its QMetaType does not have the
NeedsConstruction flag set, it can be initialized with memzero. We set that
flag if the type is complex according to QTypeInfo. However, after the
discussion in
Hi all,
While the CI maintenance break today took a little longer than usual, it also
came with two very nice new features that will hopefully make everybody’s life
easier.
First of all, you can now find a ‘Precheck' button in gerrit. That button
triggers a full CI test run of the Sha1 in the
In case forgotten…this is ongoing. Should be over soon.
-Olli
From: Development on behalf of Ville-Pekka
Karhu
Date: Monday, 22. February 2021 at 15.58
To: Qt development mailing list
Subject: [Development] Monthly CI maintenance break - March (Mon 1st Mar 2021)
Hi all!
We’ll have our
Hi,
Maintenance break is done.
VP
From: Ville-Pekka Karhu
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 2:06 PM
To: Qt development mailing list
Subject: Re: Monthly CI maintenance break - March (Mon 1st Mar 2021)
Hi,
It seems that 6 hours was not enough, so maintenance break
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 01:25:50PM +, Lars Knoll wrote:
First of all, you can now find a ‘Precheck' button in gerrit. That
button triggers a full CI test run of the Sha1 in the change and will
post back the result of that run as a comment.
so this simply exposes the pre-existing
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 01:25:50PM +, Lars Knoll wrote:
>> First of all, you can now find a ‘Precheck' button in gerrit. That
>> button triggers a full CI test run of the Sha1 in the change and will
>> post back the result of that run as a comment.
Oswald Buddenhagen (1 March 2021 17:02)
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 15:31, Lars Knoll wrote:
> To fix this, we have now added a new feature (called parallel staging
> branches), where CI rounds are not serialised anymore. Instead, COIN will
> start a new CI run 15 minutes after a change (or a set of changes) got
> staged. It will start
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 04:22:01PM +, Edward Welbourne wrote:
One advantage of testing the branch as it
stands in Gerrit, rather than a rebase of it, is that line numbers in
the resulting build report will really correspond to those in the commit
tested, without random perturbations due to
14 matches
Mail list logo
