+1
Am 20.05.2016 um 15:09 schrieb Shawn Rutledge:
+1
On 20 May 2016, at 15:00, Robin Burchell wrote:
+1 :)
On Fri, May 20, 2016, at 02:49 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote:
Hi,
I would like to nominate Frank for approver status. He has done a fair
bit of surgery in the QML
Hi all,
[Re-sent as I think something went wrong the first time,
the mail did not appear in the archive.]
I'm working on a new feature for QCanBus to enumerate all available CAN
interfaces and query more information about them [0].
As it turns out, the Linux SocketCAN API allows a lot, but
y knows it, but looks like a sledgehammer for my small
problem.
Cheers,
Andre
Am 11.08.2016 um 15:47 schrieb Edward Welbourne:
André Hartmann
[Re-sent as I think something went wrong the first time,
the mail did not appear in the archive.]
I haven't seen it before, at least.
In this thread, Kurt Van
Hi,
oops, looks like I triggerd an avalanche.
Just to clarify, if we can solve the problem within Qt, then there is no
need to include external libraries.
Thiagos patch https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/167772/ looks quit
promising, at least for an important part of my problem.
Best
Am 11.08.2016 um 22:22 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 19:58:48 PDT André Hartmann wrote:
Thiagos patch https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/167772/ looks quit
promising, at least for an important part of my problem.
Nice to know.
Note the patch is crude
,
Andre
Am 12.08.2016 um 07:39 schrieb Denis Shienkov:
Hi Andre,
We can try to use libudev (or to parse the sysfs entries) to find out
additional information too.
At first, we just need to check what we can take from it.
BR,
Denis
11.08.2016 16:28, André Hartmann пишет:
Hi all,
[Re-sent as I think
Hi Oswald,
> look at the changes' review comments?
Sorry for the noise. Now I got it :)
Thanks, André
Am 06.02.2017 um 10:59 schrieb Oswald Buddenhagen:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:24:33AM +0100, André Hartmann wrote:
and what about changes already uploaded to Gerrit, containing a
che
velopment@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
André Hartman
Hi Brett,
Am 24.02.2017 um 15:08 schrieb Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.):
On 2/24/17, 4:05 AM, "Hamed Masafi" wrote:
Hi
Hi Hamed
I'd seen Qt Remote Objects. But is has not any document. I read wiki
and some information and compiled source and examples. I hope
Am 24.09.2016 um 11:04 schrieb Tim Blechmann:
> hi all,
>
> the 5.7.1 release was scheduled for sept/oct ... october is almost over,
> so i wonder what's the state of it?
>
> thanks a lot,
> tim
Hi Tim,
I don't know the exact release plan either, but I guess they want to get
5.6.2 released
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
André Hartmann, Dipl.-Ing. (FH)
Software Project Manager
iseg Spezialelektronik GmbH | phone: ++49 (0)351 26996
Hi all,
Yesterday I installed a Qt 5.9 beta snapshot and I'm impressed how much
the Maintenance Tool improved! The possibility to install Qt versions in
parallel and to remove single components is awesome!
There is one thing missing to make it perfect: Allow to store the
downloaded archives
I'd like to propose the nomination of Denis Shienkov for Approver
status.
Denis has been the maintainer of QtSerialPort for a long time now.
He also formed the architecture of QtSerialBus and provided several CAN
plugins there. He further contributes to other parts of Qt and QtCreator
and is
Hi Denis,
> WOW, I'm surprised.. Thanks. Need to drink.. :)
But don't drink too much ... you may have to review something later today :)
Honestly, this is also a "thank you" for your long-term Qt contribution.
Keep it up!
Best regards,
André
Am 01.08.2017 um 12:18 schrieb Denis Shienkov:
P.
André
ciao,
Uwe
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
André Hartmann, Dipl.-Ing. (FH)
Software Project Manager
iseg Spezialelektronik GmbH | phone
Hi Jani,
Am 13.06.2017 um 12:52 schrieb Jani Heikkinen:
Hi,
As a conclusion of subject:
only change related to pre-built binaries for 5.10 (from Qt 5.9) is dropping 32
bit iOS.
And from 5.11 -> we will drop MSVC2013 as well.
There isn't conclusion about mingw yet but let's agree to switch
Hi Jani,
I've got two questions regarding the 5.9.1 release:
1. There have been no "changes file" templates provided so far. I guess
this will lead to last-minute hectic if you want to release in June. It
would be good to have such templates as soon as the release branch is
created.
2. For
Hi, since a while C++11 is allowed in Qt and there is ongoing effort
porting e.g. examples to the new possibilities.
The section "Conventions for C++11 usage" in [1] states:
"Note: This section is not an accepted convention yet.
This section serves as baseline for further discussions."
I'd
Hi Kevin,
Am 15.09.2017 um 10:47 schrieb Kevin Funk:
On Friday, 15 September 2017 06:42:34 CEST André Hartmann wrote:
Hi, since a while C++11 is allowed in Qt and there is ongoing effort
porting e.g. examples to the new possibilities.
Slightly OT but I hope still useful: I'm out of the loop
Hi Daniel,
thanks for your first contribution.
Reading your message remembers me when I started learning Git and
contributing to Qt (Creator) some years back ...
The others already said very important things, so I'm just concentrating
on one:
> When checking the branch with "git branch",
Hi Daniel,
I'm currently reviewing your patch :)
> While amending my commits I must somehow have pushed another commit
> again that is not from me at all. It is this one:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/207639/
I think this is no big deal. To avoid more confusion I'd suggest to
leave
g
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
André Hartmann, Dipl.-Ing. (FH)
Software Project Manager
iseg Spezialelektronik GmbH | phone: ++49 (0)351 26996-43
Bautzner Landstr. 23| fax: ++49 (0)351 26996-21
D-0
Hi Victor,
just my 2 cent to one part:
4. I don't think we need to be as paranoid towards contributions from >
our own employees as we need to be towards external contributions.
Anyone with approver rights should be aware of his powers and use them
carefully, no matter if he is employed
Am 01.10.2017 um 08:37 schrieb Christian Gagneraud:
https://codereview.qt-project.org is not loading, it hangs. Is it just for me?
Hi Chris,
I was just about asking the same question ;)
"
Proxy Error
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server
Am 02.10.2017 um 10:56 schrieb Edward Welbourne:
Am 01.10.2017 um 08:37 schrieb Christian Gagneraud:
https://codereview.qt-project.org is not loading, it hangs. Is it just for me?
André Hartmann (1 October 2017 08:39)
I was just about asking the same question ;)
I trust this is now back
Hello again,
I just wanted to give a quick "thank you" to the one (Eddy?) that
convinced Sanity Bot! Everything is fine now.
André
Am 02.10.2017 um 11:08 schrieb André Hartmann:
Am 02.10.2017 um 10:56 schrieb Edward Welbourne:
Am 01.10.2017 um 08:37 schrieb Christian Gagner
Hi Jani,
thanks for the update. Good luck getting the integration succeeding :)
Best regards,
André
Am 22.08.2017 um 09:13 schrieb Jani Heikkinen:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Development [mailto:development-
bounces+jani.heikkinen=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of André
Hartmann
Hi all,
We had 5.10 feature freeze two weeks ago but I still see no 5.10 branch
in Gerrit. That means everything submitted to master now will land in
5.10?! That effectively blocks master for new features, and if I want
fixes for 5.10 I have to push them to master also, not knowing when a
qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
André Hartmann, Dipl.-Ing. (FH)
Software Project Manager
iseg Spezialelektronik GmbH | phone: ++49 (0)351 26996-43
Bautzner Landstr. 23| fax: ++49 (0
lopment@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
André Ha
Hello all,
I'd like to nominate Lorenz Haas for approver status.
Lorenz has been contributing to Qt and Qt Creator since spring 2013. He
has provided some high quality patches to Creators C++ Editor and is the
author of Creators Beautifier plugin.
He is actively reviewing patches in these
.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) André Hartmann
Softwareentwicklung / Software Development
E-Mail: andre.hartm...@iseg-hv.de | Tel: +49 351 26996-43 | Fax: +49 351
26996-21
iseg Spezialelektronik GmbH - HIGH VOLTAGE. EXACTLY.
iseg-hv.de | iseg-hv
/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) André Hartmann
Softwareentwicklung / Software Development
E-Mail: andre.hartm...@iseg-hv.de | Tel: +49 351 26996-43 | Fax: +49 351
26996-21
iseg Spezi
Hi Jake,
I'd also like to thank you for all your work on Qt and especially QBS.
Best wishes for your future!
André
Am 09.02.2018 um 21:14 schrieb Jake Petroules:
Steve Jobs once said:
“I have looked in the mirror every morning and asked myself: "If today were the last day of my
life,
Hi Jani and Roland,
First: Happy New Year to all!
Am 21.12.2017 um 11:59 schrieb Roland Winklmeier:
2017-12-21 11:37 GMT+01:00 Jani Heikkinen >:
With Qt 5.11 it seems we can finally drop MSVC2013 so we could
"temporarily" add MinGW
Hi Igor,
Am 01.01.2018 um 13:20 schrieb Igor Mironchik:
Hi,
Looks good. Now verify your git remote (is the port correct there?)
Also make sure git uses the right ssh and therefore finds the public
key.
The problem *is* on your computer.
Are you on Windows?
Think that I found a
Am 01.01.2018 um 17:11 schrieb Igor Mironchik:
Hi,
On 01.01.2018 18:50, André Hartmann wrote:
Hi Igor,
Am 01.01.2018 um 13:20 schrieb Igor Mironchik:
Hi,
Looks good. Now verify your git remote (is the port correct there?)
Also make sure git uses the right ssh and therefore finds
Hi,
Am 04.01.2018 um 12:12 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On Thursday, 4 January 2018 08:40:43 -02 Igor Mironchik wrote:
Hi,
On 04.01.2018 13:00, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Thursday, 4 January 2018 06:35:33 -02 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:27:06AM +0300, Igor Mironchik
Hi Frederik,
one more question: does the script also sets the final Git-SHA1 in the
Jira "commits" field?
If yes, that would really be a *big* improvement.
> Everything else (wip/foobar, other branch names) will be ignored,
> unless someone explains what to do with them otherwise.
I think
Am 24.08.2018 um 10:58 schrieb André Pönitz:
"Being out of support by Microsoft" seems to be for quite a few people
a rather unimportant line of reasoning in comparison to having to submit
to Windows 10-style forced system upgrades and snooping on user activities.
I couldn't agree you more.
Hi Denis and Konstantin,
I've run into problems on Debian testing recently and it appears to have
been the same problem as you're having. Perhaps you could try something
like this:
GIT_SSH_COMMAND="ssh -c aes256-cbc"
Looks like https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-1530
It's been a
Hi Lorenz,
I can only reply to the second half of your request.
Follow-up question if a timeout could be added: AFAIK adding an new
parameter to waitForFinished() or adding an overload is BiC.
That's only true if you *change* the existing method. Adding a new
overload while keeping the
Hi Martin,
The branch 5.9 is in cherry-picking mode, so all fixes need to go to
5.11 currently. If they are considered relevant for 5.9, they can be
cherry-picked afterwards.
Regards,
André
Am 11.07.2018 um 10:50 schrieb Martin Koller:
Hi,
I want to create a patch for the 5.9 version,
Hi Miklos,
thanks for your interest in QtSerialBus!
> - Are there any interest of upstreaming such a patch?
Of course. We don't have any macOS support for now, so this would
greatly improve the situation.
> - The library named differently (PCBUSB vs. pcanbasic). This issue can
> be easily
+1 from my side also :)
André
Am 20.03.2018 um 14:29 schrieb Laszlo Agocs:
+1 from me as well.
Cheers,
Laszlo
-Original Message-
From: Development On
Behalf Of Shawn Rutledge
Sent: tirsdag 20. mars 2018 14.28
To:
+1 of course :)
André
Am 21.03.2018 um 12:49 schrieb Lars Knoll:
He isn’t an approver yet? I agree, that we should change that :)
+1 from my side!
Cheers,
Lars
On 21 Mar 2018, at 12:33, Sérgio Martins wrote:
Hi,
Albert has been a long time contributor to KDE
Hello,
my patch is stucking in integration since yesterday:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/223840/
Can someone with mighty powers have a look please? Normally, the
integration takes 10 minutes.
Thanks,
André
___
Development mailing list
Sorry, wrong link: I meant THIS one:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/224190/
Thanks.
Am 23.03.2018 um 08:13 schrieb André Hartmann:
Hello,
my patch is stucking in integration since yesterday:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/223840/
Can someone with mighty powers have a look
lopment-bounces+jani.heikkinen=qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf
of André Hartmann <andre.hartm...@iseg-hv.de>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 9:15 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Patch stucking in integration
Sorry, wrong link: I meant THIS one:
https://coderevie
Hi all,
I fully agree, Olivier.
Looking at https://docs.kdab.com/analysis/qtcreator/clazy.html gives
currently 223 potential detaching containers within range-based for, and
qtbase alone has 46 (https://docs.kdab.com/analysis/qt5/clazy.html).
Even if there may be some false positives, who
that for now I don't need a wip branch, as enough other
possiblities exist.
Thanks for your time.
Regards,
André
[1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-64145
Am 02.10.2018 um 13:08 schrieb Oswald Buddenhagen:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:37:24AM +0200, André Hartmann wrote:
I allready have so
Hi all,
I allready have some ideas for QCanBusDevice which requires
binary-incompatible changes and therefore needs to be done for Qt6 [1].
To be able to already start the work, I'm hereby requesting a wip branch
that could be merged when the "real" Qt6 development begins.
The advantage
Hi Martin,
the all-members list is very useful to get an overview about a class.
You're searching for a function to perform a specific task, that you
assume to be in a class. Searching through all inherited classes is a
tedious task.
If there are no technical limitations, I'm for keeping
: André Hartmann
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 9:19:07 AM
To: Martin Smith; Konstantin Shegunov
Cc: Qt development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Development] Missing documentation in Qt 5.12
Hi Martin,
the all-members list is very useful to get an overview about a class.
You're searching
Hi,
The Qt Creator archive seems broken too.
https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-creator/2019-January/thread.html
only contains two mails, but I'm pretty sure there has been more.
Regards,
André
Am 08.01.19 um 12:20 schrieb Edward Welbourne:
On 21/11/2018 13.10, Danila Malyutin
Thanks!
Am 09.01.19 um 11:25 schrieb Edward Welbourne:
André Hartmann (8 January 2019 14:09) wrote:
The Qt Creator archive seems broken too.
https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-creator/2019-January/thread.html
only contains two mails, but I'm pretty sure there has been more.
Same
Hi all,
I recently found an inconsistency regarding empty lambda parameter lists
between [1] and [2]. While the first states, that parentheses have to be
written always, the latter is missing this section.
My request to syncronize both [3] lead to the conclusion, to change the rule,
so that
Hi all,
I just stumbled about the problem, that the new Gerrit removes the
sanity review vote after a change was moved to a new destination branch.
While it's probably good to remove code review votes on branch change,
the sanity review should not be affected from this. Or if it is, the
sanity
Hi Christian,
for me in Germany the web interface is slower than usual, but still useable.
André
On 14.07.19 04:07, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
Hi there,
Is it just me or code-review.qt-project.org is very slow?
I have no problem with other web sites, but code-review keeps timing out?
Anyone
Hi Thiago,
> But QByteArray is encoding-indeterminate since it can carry any type.
Correct, it is often used as "generic raw data array", e.g. in QFile,
Q*Socket, QSerialPort, QCanBusFrame etc. Here we really need to treat
the data as-is, without interpretation.
> Arguably, toUpper() and
Hi all,
I'm not sure if it's related to the gravatars, but Gerrit became
horrible slow here (this is on a 2MBit DSL line). It's almost unuseable.
Has someone else experienced the same?
Regards,
André
Am 01.07.19 um 19:57 schrieb André Pönitz:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:43:43PM +,
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
--
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) André Hartmann
Softwareentwicklung / Software Development
E-Mail: andre.hartm...@iseg-hv.de | Tel: +49 351 26996-43 | Fax: +49 351
26996-21
iseg
Hi all,
It seems JIRA don't send me an email anymore when a comment is added to
a report I'm watching.
I'm not aware that I have changed something in that regard, so has
anyone else noticed the same?
Best regards,
André
___
Development mailing list
Hi all,
The script creating the changlog still oversees a lot of QTBUG - > entries. I
could not find out why the bug number is sometimes added
to> the changelog entry and sometimes doesn't.> See for example>
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/281862/2..3/dist/changes-5.14.0
I've
Hi Timur,
I'm sure you didn't mean me, but as I'm a André too I'll answer:
AndrЁ: I'm probably missing something, but ... yeah, it's about Vitaly,
who's this Kirill you're talking about? Sorry if I misunderstood this ...
Just click on the links ;)
Regards,
André
> Looks like Kirill did
Hi all,
I want to propose a colleague of mine, Mårten Nordheim, as a co-maintainer of
QtNetwork module with him
becoming the maintainer of „High-Level network access (HTTP)"* (which
essentially means QNetworkAccessManager
and related classes/code, sub-module 'access' etc.) component and me
Hartmann for maintainer for QCanBus API
Hi,
The QCanbus API is part of the QtSerialBus module. Since its first release it has
come a long way. In particular, André Hartmann & Denis Shienkov made big
contributions over time. For that I am very grateful. Thank you.
As the current mainta
s up: Christian, you did a great job polishing the
Project Management subsystem during the last 18 month. A lot of really
old bugs were resolved, so I like to express my respect. All the best
with your new tasks, too.
Best regards,
André
--
André Hartmann, Dipl. Ing. (FH)
Softwareentwicklung / Soft
Dear Denis,
I'd also like to thank you for starting and maintaining QtSerialPort for
such a long time.
I have successfully used it in many projects, and as Tomasz already
said, it's really fun to work with that module.
Currently I don't have enough time for maintaining another module, but
I'm
Hi all,
I like to propose Alex Trotsenko as approver.
Alex has been contributing to Qt since 2014, and has done *a lot*
of low level optimization and fixes. He has a deep knowledge of
QIODevice, Q*Socket, QProcess, and related classes.
Furthermore, he is also an active and helpful reviewer.
Thanks Andreas,
it seems Liang already added the cmake experts to the patch, so let's
hope they are able to resolve the problems.
Happy Sunday!
André
On 09.01.21 15:22, Andreas Buhr wrote:
Hi André,
On 09.01.21 14:20, André Hartmann wrote:
> I have staging problems for some t
Hi all,
I have staging problems for some time with the following patch:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtserialbus/+/325691
The error is:
Continuous Integration: Failed
Failed to install a source archive. That should not happen, please
contact the Coin admins and maybe try to
Dear Gerrit admins,
can you please move the change [1] to dev? For some reason (too old?) it
is missing the "move change" menu.
Thanks in advance,
André
[1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtserialbus/+/199255
___
Development mailing list
Hi Alex,
it seems I now have gray "Edit" and "Delete" buttons below every Jira
report comment. I think that was a pen at the right top of every comment
in the old version.
Was this change intentional?
For me, this disturbs the thread reading flow and it is easy to click
such a button by
Hi Thiago,
Some users see the option to edit anyone's comments. I don't know what group
options applied, but I am on that list.
I think this is the Approvers group. My Jira possibilities increased
massively when I gained Approver rights.
I preferred the less intrusive older UI, but I can
Hi Alex,
IMO everybody should only be able to modify their own comments.
This is true for almost all cases; but I remember e.g. fixing links in
other's comments to make further reader's life easier.
But that is such a rare thing that it should be hidden in a menu or so.
So yes, I reverted
Good morning,
for me both suggestions (first separate the code, then moving it to Qt)
sounds good to me.
+1
André
Am 30.11.23 um 23:00 schrieb apoenitz:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 07:41:06PM +, Fabian Kosmale wrote:
Hi,
I agree that it would be nice to properly separate Solutions (to
77 matches
Mail list logo