On Friday, 13 January 2023 10:50:41 PST Edward Welbourne via Development
wrote:
> Indeed, git can: for example
>
> git tag --contains --list v5.15.*
>
> just the same as for branches, but using a glob for the tags.
Indeed. But for tags, it should verify that the tag is exactly the one that
On Friday, 13 January 2023 06:12:44 PST Samuli Piippo via Development wrote:
>> bitbake runs branch validation as 'git branch --contains --list
>> '
Thiago Macieira (13 January 2023 16:32) replied:
> Then don't do *branch* validation. I'm sure it can validate tags too.
Indeed, git can: for
On Friday, 13 January 2023 06:12:44 PST Samuli Piippo via Development wrote:
> bitbake runs branch validation as 'git branch --contains --list
> '
Then don't do *branch* validation. I'm sure it can validate tags too.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Cloud Software
bitbake runs branch validation as 'git branch --contains --list '
From: Development on behalf of Thiago
Macieira
Sent: 13 January 2023 15:25
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.12.12 branches disappeared from code.qt.io?
On Thursday
On Thursday, 12 January 2023 23:03:27 PST Samuli Piippo via Development wrote:
> Using tags for the yocto builds is not going to help, since the way bitbake
> tries to validate the SHA1s that are already being used in the meta-qt5 and
> meta-qt6 recipes.
That's an explanation that doesn't explain
etching
[2] https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/yocto/meta-qt6/+/447775
From: Development on behalf of Thiago
Macieira
Sent: 12 January 2023 20:50
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.12.12 branches disappeared from code.qt.io?
On Thursday,
On Thursday, 12 January 2023 07:54:33 PST Jon Trulson wrote:
> The reason this became a problem for me was that meta-qt5's warrior
> branch uses these Qt branches (5.12.12 in my case), and these builds now
> fail.
They should use the tags, not the branches.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira
On 1/12/23 05:26, Edward Welbourne via Development wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:29:11 PST Jon Trulson wrote:
Will these be returning at some point?
On 1/12/23 01:24, Thiago Macieira wrote:
No.
Christian Kandeler (12 January 2023 09:24) asked:
Out of curiosity: Who gains what by
On Thursday, 12 January 2023 00:24:16 PST Christian Kandeler via Development
wrote:
> On 1/12/23 01:24, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:29:11 PST Jon Trulson wrote:
> >> Will these be returning at some point?
> >
> > No.
>
> Out of curiosity: Who gains what by
On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:29:11 PST Jon Trulson wrote:
>>> Will these be returning at some point?
On 1/12/23 01:24, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> No.
Christian Kandeler (12 January 2023 09:24) asked:
> Out of curiosity: Who gains what by removing branches?
On Gerrit it makes sense; we should
On 1/12/23 01:24, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:29:11 PST Jon Trulson wrote:
Will these be returning at some point?
No.
Out of curiosity: Who gains what by removing branches?
Christian
___
Development mailing list
On 1/11/23 17:24, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:29:11 PST Jon Trulson wrote:
Will these be returning at some point?
No.
Fair enough. I'll let the customer know there is some work ahead to
keep their builds going.
Thanks!
--
Jon Trulson
"The less you know,
On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:29:11 PST Jon Trulson wrote:
> Will these be returning at some point?
No.
Use the tag instead.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
