Re: [Development] Review for new widget module [your advices are needed]

2017-10-17 Thread iman ahmadvand
Hi Shawn. There are 2 things here: 1.In MaterialWidgets we're not going to have lots of animations (like the QML) 2.As i ran many tests under a regular PC, animations were smooth enough and frame rate was pretty good BTW easing curves are there and will help us a lot! And about the styles, i'm

Re: [Development] Review for new widget module [your advices are needed]

2017-10-17 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
17.10.2017, 15:05, "Shawn Rutledge" : >>  On 14 Oct 2017, at 09:33, iman ahmadvand wrote: >> >>  Hi everyone. >> >>  Before I send some code base on codereview and decide whether my >> implementation meets the requirements, I just want to know your

Re: [Development] Review for new widget module [your advices are needed]

2017-10-17 Thread Shawn Rutledge
> On 14 Oct 2017, at 09:33, iman ahmadvand wrote: > > Hi everyone. > > Before I send some code base on codereview and decide whether my > implementation meets the requirements, I just want to know your thoughts > about design decision for the new module I’m trying to

Re: [Development] Review for new widget module [your advices are needed]

2017-10-16 Thread iman ahmadvand
Thank you Jesus for attempt. Actually those headers are created automatically as a pre-build step by material style generator (via src/util/util.pro project). and a python script (src/util/generate.py) is responsible for creating those needed headers from text ones. So if you just build the root

Re: [Development] Review for new widget module [your advices are needed]

2017-10-16 Thread Jesus Fernandez
Hello Iman, I tried to give a try to this thing. I think you forgot to add a couple of files: * style/palettes.h * style/styleoption.h -- Best regards, Jesús On 2017-10-14 09:33:52+02:00 iman ahmadvand wrote: Hi everyone. Before I send some code base on codereview and decide whether my

Re: [Development] Review for new widget module [your advices are needed]

2017-10-16 Thread Christian Gagneraud
Few days ago, should be easy to find on mailing list archives Sorry on my phone right now. Go to October arch. Chris ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Review for new widget module [your advices are needed]

2017-10-16 Thread iman ahmadvand
So the idea itself seems good to you AND that's enough for me as well. And about the next part, you will. Consider a situation that you're going to develop a client or something in embedded or desktop and you don't need to deal with QML or something else for your modern interfaces, and just wanna

Re: [Development] Review for new widget module [your advices are needed]

2017-10-16 Thread iman ahmadvand
Thanks for your participation Christian . And i think it wouldn't be a conflicts because we have QtCharts both in widgets and QML. Could you tell what month was that Thiago's mention about the blog pos? I couldn't find it. Iman. On Mon,

Re: [Development] Review for new widget module [your advices are needed]

2017-10-16 Thread André Hartmann
Hi Chris, Am 16.10.2017 um 08:11 schrieb Christian Gagneraud: From an end user point of view, i think it's a great idea but I think it conflicts with Qml. At work we have our own set of highly customised widgets, for embedded devices, it simply works, no need (yet) for Qml. I would be

Re: [Development] Review for new widget module [your advices are needed]

2017-10-16 Thread Christian Gagneraud
>From an end user point of view, i think it's a great idea but I think it conflicts with Qml. At work we have our own set of highly customised widgets, for embedded devices, it simply works, no need (yet) for Qml. I would be interested to see your work and give my opinion if it can help. Full

Re: [Development] Review for new widget module [your advices are needed]

2017-10-15 Thread iman ahmadvand
No one interested ? On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:03 AM, iman ahmadvand wrote: > Hi everyone. > > Before I send some code base on codereview and decide whether my > implementation meets the requirements, I just want to know your thoughts > about design decision for the new