Re: Console-conf and ip address

2016-10-11 Thread Shuduo Sang
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > Am Mittwoch, den 05.10.2016, 09:21 +0200 schrieb Julia Palandri: > > Ahá! Apparently the rpi2 image doesn't deliver snapweb :) (snap list > > doesn't show it). > > > the pi2 beta image does, the dailies do not though

Re: ubuntu-image 0.7ubuntu1

2016-10-11 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, On Di, 2016-10-11 at 10:54 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >  > So I would suggest: > >  - a --size option to ubuntu-image to specify the full image size > (needs >    some careful thought for the multiple-image case) just default to the minimal size as long as it is not set, beyond this i

Re: ubuntu-image 0.7ubuntu1

2016-10-11 Thread Gustavo Niemeyer
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > On Di, 2016-10-11 at 15:12 -0300, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > > > > We need a different gadget for those cases anyway, right? We don't > > want cloud-init probing arbitrary addresses on someone's data center. > > > >

Re: ubuntu-image 0.7ubuntu1

2016-10-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 06:12:06PM +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 11.10.2016, 11:55 -0400 schrieb Barry Warsaw: > > On Oct 11, 2016, at 05:01 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > > > defining it in the gadget would be rather awful since that means if we > > > use an identical image for

Re: ubuntu-image 0.7ubuntu1

2016-10-11 Thread Gustavo Niemeyer
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Steve Langasek < steve.langa...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 06:12:06PM +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, den 11.10.2016, 11:55 -0400 schrieb Barry Warsaw: > > > On Oct 11, 2016, at 05:01 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > > > > >

Re: ubuntu-image 0.7ubuntu1

2016-10-11 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, On Di, 2016-10-11 at 15:12 -0300, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: >  > We need a different gadget for those cases anyway, right?  We don't > want cloud-init probing arbitrary addresses on someone's data center. > > I agree with Barry here. I'd prefer to encourage people to make > gadget.yaml be