Re: [PATCH 2/5] iio: at91: Use different prescal, startup mask in MR for different IP

2013-07-17 Thread Nicolas Ferre
On 16/07/2013 21:17, Thomas Petazzoni : Dear Jonathan Cameron, On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:03:38 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On 07/16/2013 12:30 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: I've asked exactly this question last week at Linaro Connect during the ARM SoC consolidation panel/discussion, where Gran

Re: [PATCH 2/5] iio: at91: Use different prescal, startup mask in MR for different IP

2013-07-16 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Jonathan Cameron, On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:03:38 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 07/16/2013 12:30 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > I've asked exactly this question last week at Linaro Connect during the > > ARM SoC consolidation panel/discussion, where Grant Likely, Arnd > > Bergmann, Olof

Re: [PATCH 2/5] iio: at91: Use different prescal, startup mask in MR for different IP

2013-07-16 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 07/16/2013 12:30 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Nicolas Ferre, > > On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:46:28 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > >>> Ok, that make sense. I will use compatible names for the capabilities in >>> next version. Thanks. >> >> Hold on a little bit Josh, I know that Jean-Christophe

Re: [PATCH 2/5] iio: at91: Use different prescal, startup mask in MR for different IP

2013-07-16 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Nicolas Ferre, On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:46:28 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > Ok, that make sense. I will use compatible names for the capabilities in > > next version. Thanks. > > Hold on a little bit Josh, I know that Jean-Christophe is not in favor > of the use of multiple compatible stri