2010/1/15 Richard Hughes :
> I think it's a bit late to switch just before 2.30, in the case of
> DK-p. For 3.0 I'll ask the rename to happen, and patch the
> applications myself.
Speaking of renaming: It would be nice if upower and udisks used the
same naming scheme for the daemon, specifically I
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 13:07 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I'd also be interested in David's plans for udisks for GNOME 2.30.
> As devicekits-disk resp. udisks is encapsulated by g-d-u/gvfs the
> switch should be easier there, right?
Right. The plan is for gnome-disk-utility 2.30 to depend on udisk
2010/1/15 Michael Biebl :
> Currently I find the following reverse dependencies of
> libdevkit-gobject-power:
> gnome-session
> gnome-power-manager
> gdm
Agreed, and also now tracker.
> Not sure, how many apps use the D-Bus interface.
> What are your plans wrt GNOME 2.30? Will those apps be port
2010/1/8 Richard Hughes :
> 2010/1/8 Michael Biebl :
>> so, the next version will be renamed to upower then?
>> What's the ETA for that release?
>
> I'm waiting for freedesktop to rename the repos. We'll also be doing
> DeviceKit-power releases in parallel with upower for some time, as
> distros su
2010/1/10 Zhu, Peter J :
> Would dbus interface naming change or NOT? Same question to DK-disk/u-disk
> migration
Yes, they would both change.
Richard.
___
devkit-devel mailing list
devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailma
y 09, 2010 4:04 AM
> To: Michael Biebl
> Cc: devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: DeviceKit-power 014 released
>
> 2010/1/8 Michael Biebl :
> > so, the next version will be renamed to upower then?
> > What's the ETA for that release?
>
> I'm
On 1/8/10 3:13 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 2010/1/8 Joe Marcus Clarke :
>> How will upower change in terms of portability? I hate to think all of
>> the backend work I did for FreeBSD needs to be redone again.
>
> It's basically a sed script that renames DeviceKit -> upower. Nothing
> mechanical
2010/1/8 Joe Marcus Clarke :
> How will upower change in terms of portability? I hate to think all of
> the backend work I did for FreeBSD needs to be redone again.
It's basically a sed script that renames DeviceKit -> upower. Nothing
mechanical changes.
Richard.
On 1/8/10 3:04 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 2010/1/8 Michael Biebl :
>> so, the next version will be renamed to upower then?
>> What's the ETA for that release?
>
> I'm waiting for freedesktop to rename the repos. We'll also be doing
> DeviceKit-power releases in parallel with upower for some time,
2010/1/8 Michael Biebl :
> so, the next version will be renamed to upower then?
> What's the ETA for that release?
I'm waiting for freedesktop to rename the repos. We'll also be doing
DeviceKit-power releases in parallel with upower for some time, as
distros such as F12 are shipping DK-p which we'
2010/1/8 Richard Hughes :
> Version 014
> ~~~
> Released: 2010-01-08
Hi Richard,
so, the next version will be renamed to upower then?
What's the ETA for that release?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from
Version 014
~~~
Released: 2010-01-08
New Features:
- Import the FreeBSD backend (Joe Marcus Clarke)
Bugfixes:
- Check if swap exists before determining how much is free (Debbie Beliveau)
- Comment out some problematic compiler warnings (Joe Marcus Clarke)
- Prevent segfault if connect
12 matches
Mail list logo
