On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 13:02 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > The rest of
> > the improvements are great and much needed so it'd be a shame to have to
> > stick on 0.9.
>
> In the GNOME stack, we had 3 users in the shell stack
> (gnome-settings-daemon, gnome-control-center, and gnome-shell), and
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 11:26 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 03:44:45PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Heya,
> > […]
> > libupower-glib
> > --
> > […]
> > Removed functions:
> > - up_client_get_properties_sync()
> > - up_client_enumerate_devices_sync()
> >
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 03:44:45PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Heya,
> […]
> libupower-glib
> --
> […]
> Removed functions:
> - up_client_get_properties_sync()
> - up_client_enumerate_devices_sync()
> - up_client_get_on_low_battery() (use the "warning-level" property on
> the
On Friday 18 October 2013 21:15:46 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Removing the suspend/hibernate functionality most likely means for
> them that they either have to rely on systemd or cook up their own
> solution. XFCE and KDE are much more hesitant to rely on systemd
> afaik, so I'd be interested to know
Bastien's response
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bastien Nocera
Date: 2013/10/18
Subject: Re: UPower 1.0 API changes
To: Michael Biebl
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 14:52 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Do you know if XFCE (e.g. xfce-power-manager) and KDE (Solid,
> powe
this was supposed to go to the list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael Biebl
Date: 2013/10/18
Subject: Re: UPower 1.0 API changes
To: Bastien Nocera
Hi,
2013/10/17 Bastien Nocera :
>
> Removed functions:
> - up_client_get_proper
Heya,
I'll be blogging shortly[1] about the UPower changes that I've made on
master. Consider this a simple porting guide for your applications.
libupower-glib
--
Added functions:
- up_client_get_display_device(), gets you a UpDevice that represents
the combination of all batteries a
