Re: How to migrate the X server?

2009-08-05 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Peter, Peter Hutterer [2009-08-05 16:42 +1000]: > The main issue I see is with the integration of distribution-shipped code > and user-configured code. With the current system, we have /usr/share/hal/* > for distro-code and /etc/hal/* for user-configured code. Note that udev has the same: d

Re: udev-ish replacement for hal-cups-utils?

2009-08-05 Thread Ozan Çağlayan
Tim Waugh wrote On 31-07-2009 16:07: > On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 21:47 +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote: > >> When will this come? Right now? Later? >> > > It's implemented now, and merged into 1.1.x. I've removed the udev > branch. > Just tried it with an HP P1005 which requires a firmware and

Re: udev-ish replacement for hal-cups-utils?

2009-08-05 Thread Tim Waugh
I've reverted the D-Bus system service change, as Till pointed out a race condition with doing it that way. Instead we'll do it by forking the process, as before. On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 16:05 +0300, Ozan Çağlayan wrote: > Aug 5 15:42:44 ozan2009-pardus /lib/udev/hpljP1005: foo2zjs: loading HP > L

Re: How to migrate the X server?

2009-08-05 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 05/08/2009 08:42, Peter Hutterer a écrit : > However, right now I can only think of another process being the > configuration store, adding the properties to udev for the server to pick it > up (which, incidentally, would be quite similar to the original hotplug > support (daniel's "respeclarati

Re: How to migrate the X server?

2009-08-05 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Rémi Cardona wrote: > Le 05/08/2009 08:42, Peter Hutterer a écrit : >> However, right now I can only think of another process being the >> configuration store, adding the properties to udev for the server to pick it >> up (which, incidentally, would be quite similar

Re: How to migrate the X server?

2009-08-05 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:33:14AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Peter Hutterer >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:21:52AM -0500, Dan Nicholson wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Peter >>

[PATCH] Don't ignore ram and loop devices.

2009-08-05 Thread Evan Dandrea
DeviceKit-disks udev rules do not ignore ram and loop devices, so the daemon should not either. --- src/devkit-disks-device.c |5 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/devkit-disks-device.c b/src/devkit-disks-device.c index 5eea218..95078af 100644 --- a/src/d