Hello Maxim,
Maxim Levitsky [2010-06-24 18:38 +0300]:
> it, and libraries that support it have just too many hardcoded
> assumptions.
>
> Why it was done this way?
To simplify and robustify the code base and avoid getting us into the
same swamp than with hal fdi files, where you needed tons of t
As $title. Testing very welcome. Thanks.
Richard.
___
devkit-devel mailing list
devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 13:38 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Maxim,
>
> Maxim Levitsky [2010-06-24 18:38 +0300]:
> > it, and libraries that support it have just too many hardcoded
> > assumptions.
> >
> > Why it was done this way?
>
> To simplify and robustify the code base and avoid getting us
Hello Maxim,
Maxim Levitsky [2010-06-25 16:18 +0300]:
> I think that udisk shouldn't know if device is usb, firewire,floppy,
> cd-writer, etc...
>
> It should use generic properties from udev rules and act upon them.
> Therefore *if* floppy is so special, we could define a set of generic
> proper
Let me support Maxim. First of all, such thing as a hardware
configuration is highly non uniform. We have real scsi hdd and
cd-roms-rams and other exotic scsi machinery, pci ssd, SX8 and similar
desktop sata controllers that doesn't export normal block sata
devices, real memory cards controllers an
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Baybal Ni wrote:
> Let me support Maxim. First of all, such thing as a hardware
> configuration is highly non uniform. We have real scsi hdd and
> cd-roms-rams and other exotic scsi machinery, pci ssd, SX8 and similar
> desktop sata controllers that doesn't ex
The latest release of pm-utils (1.4.0) added some default hooks for
helping conserve power. Based on the recent thread on linux-pm
proposing a /sys/power/policy_preference knob, I decided to implement
support for setting powersave profiles in pm-utils. From the git
logs:
Add support for powersav
