On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 04:53:16PM +0800, PCMan wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions.
> I made a new patch reading from /proc/self/mountinfo as suggested by you.
> In addition, no code is taken from HAL so there is no license issue now.
> Please review the patch attached to this mail.
>
> On Sat, F
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:55, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 04:53:16PM +0800, PCMan wrote:
>> Thanks for the suggestions.
>> I made a new patch reading from /proc/self/mountinfo as suggested by you.
>> In addition, no code is taken from HAL so there is no license issue now.
>> Please
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:09:56PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Btrfs is like a network filesystem, it has no backing device.
but for example NFS is consistent:
$ stat --format "%d" /mnt/store/a
41
$ grep /mnt/store /proc/self/mountinfo
47 20 0:41 / /mnt/store rw,relatime - nfs sr.net.home:/
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 13:33, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:09:56PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> Btrfs is like a network filesystem, it has no backing device.
>
> but for example NFS is consistent:
>
> $ stat --format "%d" /mnt/store/a
> 41
>
> $ grep /mnt/store /proc/self/moun
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:44:50PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 13:33, Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:09:56PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> Btrfs is like a network filesystem, it has no backing device.
> >
> > but for example NFS is consistent:
> >
> > $ s
