[freenet-dev] Arbitrary limits

2005-10-23 Thread freenetw...@web.de
>> > There will have to be some arbitrary limits in the 0.7 metadata. >> > >> > Is a 256 byte limit on filenames reasonable? (We are talking about >> > names >> > in manifests or ZIP manifests here). Would it be better to use longer >> > filenames? >> >> If you mean just for filenames, that shoul

[freenet-dev] Arbitrary limits

2005-10-23 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Saturday 22 October 2005 17:12, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > On 22-Oct-2005 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > There will have to be some arbitrary limits in the 0.7 metadata. > > > > Is a 256 byte limit on filenames reasonable? (We are talking about > > names > > in manifests or ZIP manifests here)

Re: [freenet-dev] Arbitrary limits

2005-10-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > There will have to be some arbitrary limits in the 0.7 metadata. >> > >> > Is a 256 byte limit on filenames reasonable? (We are talking about >> > names >> > in manifests or ZIP manifests here). Would it be better to use longer >> > filenames? >> >> If you mean just for filenames, that shoul

Re: [freenet-dev] Arbitrary limits

2005-10-23 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Saturday 22 October 2005 17:12, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > On 22-Oct-2005 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > There will have to be some arbitrary limits in the 0.7 metadata. > > > > Is a 256 byte limit on filenames reasonable? (We are talking about > > names > > in manifests or ZIP manifests here)