[freenet-dev] Current uservoice top 5

2009-05-10 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
http://infinite-hands.draketo.de -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments

[freenet-dev] Please help us test the new wininstaller (Vista users especially welcome)

2009-05-10 Thread gh...@hushmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >Joe Cynical suggests: the average user probably wouldnt be >bothered by >having both a 32-bit and a 64-bit JRE's, especially if told that >he's >supposed to. >Make "simple install" just install JRE automatically and "expert >mode" >let the user

[freenet-dev] Please help us test the new wininstaller (Vista users especially welcome)

2009-05-10 Thread Luke771
Zero3 wrote: > ghoul at hushmail.com skrev: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> >> On Fri, 08 May 2009 05:51:58 -0600 Zero3 >> wrote: >> >>> Hey >>> >>> You seem to have tested the *old* Windows installer, which >>> unfortunately >>> doesn't work on Vista. If

Re: [freenet-dev] Current uservoice top 5

2009-05-10 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland: Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we already do that! Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and it sadly doesn't work really well for memory consumption. I'd like an option to have

Re: [freenet-dev] Hashcash-based global introduction? was Re: Question about an important design decision of the WoT plugin

2009-05-10 Thread Luke771
Matthew Toseland wrote: As a parallel option for introduction, a hashcash-protected global announcement queue? Say KSK,2...@blah is a KSK protected by hashcash (this key type is implementible, the catch is that you may get a collision and then you have to find another slot and recompute).

[freenet-dev] No-WoT messages for new ID's [was: Hashcash, was: Question]

2009-05-10 Thread Luke771
Also, what about an option for ignoring the WoT's opinion until a newbie has posted at least N messages, or M time has elapsed? Sounds like a better idea than hash cash. great idea it would solve the problem in a simple elegant way, and without all the hashcash problems ...but I