[freenet-dev] The Freedom Box

2011-02-24 Thread Fenax
Le 24/02/2011 18:03, Matthew Toseland a ?crit : > On Tuesday 22 Feb 2011 21:49:57 Ximin Luo wrote: >> See the contrib-staging and debian-staging repos for details. We are fairly >> close work-wise (don't know about time-wise, I don't have a lot atm) to a >> custom debian package. However, we're far

[freenet-dev] frost is not broken by design

2011-02-24 Thread saces
Am Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:01:10 + schrieb Matthew Toseland : > On Thursday 24 Feb 2011 08:00:18 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote: > > On Thursday 24 February 2011 07:44:56 Volodya wrote: > > > > > Well, I can say that this does not really help my moral and motivation to > > > continue working on Frost

[freenet-dev] The Freedom Box

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
> > > > > ___ > > Devl mailing list > > Devl at freenetproject.org > > http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > > -- > GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE > ___ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110224/9eeb427d/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] The Freedom Box

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
, > >>>> > >>>> Decentralizing the Internet So Big Brother Can't Find You > >>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/16/nyregion/16about.html > >>>> > >>>> Sounds just like an application of Freenet. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> V. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110224/5f186cfe/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] frost is not broken by design

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110224/0d9a4035/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
plications as well as our Java-level plugins, on the basis that the user trusts the coder? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110224/0baea994/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
g to be very useful! We could limit it to some small amount of resources from its own site but it would limit functionality and cause other problems, and wouldn't entirely solve the problem ... > > > Cheers! > Michiel. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110224/a74f6ad1/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] frost is not broken by design

2011-02-24 Thread Volodya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/24/2011 11:00 AM, David ?Bombe? Roden wrote: > On Thursday 24 February 2011 07:44:56 Volodya wrote: > >> Well, I can say that this does not really help my moral and motivation to >> continue working on Frost. > > Then please just let it die.

[freenet-dev] frost is not broken by design

2011-02-24 Thread Volodya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - - Arambic at ufFdEhqep5KSVscrBVz5Cm1AtL0 - 2011.02.17 - 13:29:02GMT - Matthew Toseland on the freenet-support mailing list: 'Frost DOES at least potentially download actual evil content: an anonymous spammer can force all Frost users su

Re: [freenet-dev] The Freedom Box

2011-02-24 Thread Fenax
Le 24/02/2011 18:03, Matthew Toseland a écrit : > On Tuesday 22 Feb 2011 21:49:57 Ximin Luo wrote: >> See the contrib-staging and debian-staging repos for details. We are fairly >> close work-wise (don't know about time-wise, I don't have a lot atm) to a >> custom debian package. However, we're far

Re: [freenet-dev] frost is not broken by design

2011-02-24 Thread saces
Am Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:01:10 + schrieb Matthew Toseland : > On Thursday 24 Feb 2011 08:00:18 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > > On Thursday 24 February 2011 07:44:56 Volodya wrote: > > > > > Well, I can say that this does not really help my moral and motivation to > > > continue working on Frost

Re: [freenet-dev] The Freedom Box

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 22 Feb 2011 22:34:27 Ximin Luo wrote: > On 22/02/11 22:24, Michiel de Jong wrote: > > OK, so that's a starting point then! :) I informally proposed the inclusion > > of freenet into freedombox during this Sunday's FreedomBox Hackfest, but I > > didn't know my stuff well enough to defend

Re: [freenet-dev] The Freedom Box

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 22 Feb 2011 21:49:57 Ximin Luo wrote: > See the contrib-staging and debian-staging repos for details. We are fairly > close work-wise (don't know about time-wise, I don't have a lot atm) to a > custom debian package. However, we're far from an official package in the > debian project's "

Re: [freenet-dev] frost is not broken by design

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 24 Feb 2011 08:00:18 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > On Thursday 24 February 2011 07:44:56 Volodya wrote: > > > Well, I can say that this does not really help my moral and motivation to > > continue working on Frost. > > Then please just let it die. Give it a dignified death while that

[freenet-dev] frost is not broken by design

2011-02-24 Thread David ‘Bombe’ Roden
: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110224/5b63db15/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 14 Feb 2011 08:08:28 Michiel de Jong wrote: > I thought about this some more, and I think it doesn't make sense to > distribute applications over freenet. Rather I think the JavaScript > application should be like a viewer application, and the unhosted storage > node could do freenet-node

Re: [freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 13 Feb 2011 21:30:13 Michiel de Jong wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > > I wonder if we could build a usable sandbox based on Unhosted principles, > > i.e. an app can download and upload data specific to its user, and can talk > > to other users. We

Re: [freenet-dev] frost is not broken by design

2011-02-24 Thread Volodya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/24/2011 11:00 AM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > On Thursday 24 February 2011 07:44:56 Volodya wrote: > >> Well, I can say that this does not really help my moral and motivation to >> continue working on Frost. > > Then please just let it die.

Re: [freenet-dev] frost is not broken by design

2011-02-24 Thread David ‘Bombe’ Roden
On Thursday 24 February 2011 07:44:56 Volodya wrote: > Well, I can say that this does not really help my moral and motivation to > continue working on Frost. Then please just let it die. Give it a dignified death while that is still possible. Also, I was kind of taking all the whining serious