xor wrote:
> This looks like a physical corruption of your Freetalk database.
> Are you running it on a network drive or any other sort of unreliable
> disk? Notice that old harddisks can have bad sector errors.
> Was the system hard-reset (power failure)?
>
> It seems that you are on Linux, so
...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110331/e36ddb17/attachment.pgp>
[Excerpts from original message]
>> I wanted to suggest porting already existing "Toadlets" to normal
>> servlets and utilize Apache Struts framework for more simplicity.
[Excerpts from Ian's message]
> I'll all for moving to a standard web framework, rather than our current
> home-grown
next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110331/41cfe482/attachment.pgp>
It seems the situation somehow has converged to the error I listed from the
wrapper.log. I no longer can get the version error, or load freetalk by any
means.
Node version is
Freenet 0.7.5 Build #1362 build01362
Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771
And loaded plugins are
Library plugins.Library.Main
I get three different errors, either via freenet or website. Two of them are
that the plugin cannot be loaded: one says that version is too low, 3
required but plugin is 2.
Second is this one, from wrapper.log:
17693 INFO | jvm 2| 2011/03/31 12:32:07 | Downloading plugin
Hi everyone:
I wanted to suggest porting already existing "Toadlets" to normal
servlets and utilize Apache Struts framework for more simplicity. This
would make it easier and more intuitive to design and develop the web
interface (fproxy) using JSP pages. However it may not be an easy task
to
On 31/03/11 04:41, freenet.10.technomation at recursor.net wrote:
> Maven does verify the hash of the libraries being used when it downloads
> them, and you can specify library versions. The main maven repo managers
> require asset providers to get an account and tickets to upload assets into
>
...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110331/b0cbb4da/attachment.html>
s, and not another option (like, for example, Apache Wicket)?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
Founder, The Freenet Project
Email: ian at freenetproject.org
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110331/713b2657/attachment.html>
signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110331/dc9ed174/attachment.pgp>
Maven does verify the hash of the libraries being used when it downloads them,
and you can specify library versions. The main maven repo managers require
asset providers to get an account and tickets to upload assets into the
distributed repo.
You can also specify which repo you want to
On 31/03/11 04:41, freenet.10.technomat...@recursor.net wrote:
Maven does verify the hash of the libraries being used when it downloads
them, and you can specify library versions. The main maven repo managers
require asset providers to get an account and tickets to upload assets into
the
Hi everyone:
I wanted to suggest porting already existing Toadlets to normal
servlets and utilize Apache Struts framework for more simplicity. This
would make it easier and more intuitive to design and develop the web
interface (fproxy) using JSP pages. However it may not be an easy task
to adapt
I get three different errors, either via freenet or website. Two of them are
that the plugin cannot be loaded: one says that version is too low, 3
required but plugin is 2.
Second is this one, from wrapper.log:
17693 INFO | jvm 2| 2011/03/31 12:32:07 | Downloading plugin
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Pouyan Zachar pouyans...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone:
I wanted to suggest porting already existing Toadlets to normal
servlets and utilize Apache Struts framework for more simplicity. This
would make it easier and more intuitive to design and develop the web
It seems the situation somehow has converged to the error I listed from the
wrapper.log. I no longer can get the version error, or load freetalk by any
means.
Node version is
Freenet 0.7.5 Build #1362 build01362
Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771
And loaded plugins are
Library plugins.Library.Main
[Excerpts from original message]
I wanted to suggest porting already existing Toadlets to normal
servlets and utilize Apache Struts framework for more simplicity.
[Excerpts from Ian's message]
I'll all for moving to a standard web framework, rather than our current
home-grown solution.
Sorry folks. 1363 is out, fixes a bad Freetalk/WebOfTrust problem in 1362. What
happened was:
- WebOfTrust required new code in fred. Therefore I made the plugin updates
mandatory.
- p0s forgot to update the version numbers, and I missed this too.
- I did test 1362, but didn't test
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Pouyan Zachar pouyans...@gmail.com wrote:
[Excerpts from Ian's message]
I'll all for moving to a standard web framework, rather than our current
home-grown solution. However there are a lot of options to choose from.
Why Struts, and not another option
This looks like a physical corruption of your Freetalk database.
Are you running it on a network drive or any other sort of unreliable disk?
Notice that old harddisks can have bad sector errors.
Was the system hard-reset (power failure)?
It seems that you are on Linux, so please obtain
xor wrote:
This looks like a physical corruption of your Freetalk database.
Are you running it on a network drive or any other sort of unreliable
disk? Notice that old harddisks can have bad sector errors.
Was the system hard-reset (power failure)?
It seems that you are on Linux, so please
Received a report of more issues with false-positives with virus software:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matthew O'Donnell ...
Date: 2011/3/29
Subject: freenet possible porblems
To: ...
Dear ian,
I thought I would try freenet,as per my usual method I scan a exe with
VirusTotal
23 matches
Mail list logo
