On Wednesday 22 Feb 2012 14:58:43 Ian Clarke wrote: > Hi, that would be great! > > We did consider GWT a few years back, but the concern was the lack of > graceful degradation if the browser didn't support JavaScript. I'm not > sure how relevant that concern is in this day and age where browser support > for JavaScript is assumed on many websites. > > Ultimately my position is that if someone is willing to do the work, I'll > defer to their decision on what framework will work best for the project, > within reason. I personally wouldn't have a problem with GWT if that was > what you guys are most comfortable with if it means that the job gets done, > but others might disagree.
The other difficulty is that we will need some tag-level stuff around loading freesites anyway. This is currently implemented by abusing GWT however. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120223/8d34a8c6/attachment.pgp>
