* Matthew Toseland [2009-06-17 00:26:12]:
> We need some (3?) screenshots. These must be legal, look reasonably good both
> in full and when thumbnailed to a reasonable size so we can put them on the
> homepage.
>
> Alternatively, please explain why it would be bad to replace the news on the
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-06-17 00:26:12]:
We need some (3?) screenshots. These must be legal, look reasonably good both
in full and when thumbnailed to a reasonable size so we can put them on the
homepage.
Alternatively, please explain why it would be bad to
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I've been doing quite a bit of work in my day job with people who have
> done a vast amount of testing of the effectiveness of different
> website designs.
>
> If I were to condense what I've learned into a single caveman
> sentence, it would
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 08:17:56 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 08:06:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
> > The bad thing is: our fproxy homepage don't have any picture.
> >
> > Those little ActiveLinks icons got disabled by default.
>
> Try using Firefox - at least for me it
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 07:06:30 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > I've been doing quite a bit of work in my day job with people who have
> > done a vast amount of testing of the effectiveness of different
> > website designs.
> >
> > If I were to
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 03:16:18 Ian Clarke wrote:
> I've been doing quite a bit of work in my day job with people who have
> done a vast amount of testing of the effectiveness of different
> website designs.
>
> If I were to condense what I've learned into a single caveman
> sentence, it would
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 08:06:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
> The bad thing is: our fproxy homepage don't have any picture.
>
> Those little ActiveLinks icons got disabled by default.
Try using Firefox - at least for me it shows the activelinks.
Wishes,
Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
We need some (3?) screenshots. These must be legal, look reasonably good both
in full and when thumbnailed to a reasonable size so we can put them on the
homepage.
Alternatively, please explain why it would be bad to replace the news on the
homepage with a few screenshots.
-- next
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Ian Clarkei...@locut.us wrote:
I've been doing quite a bit of work in my day job with people who have
done a vast amount of testing of the effectiveness of different
website designs.
If I were to condense what I've learned into a single caveman
sentence, it
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 08:06:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
The bad thing is: our fproxy homepage don't have any picture.
Those little ActiveLinks icons got disabled by default.
Try using Firefox - at least for me it shows the activelinks.
Wishes,
Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 03:16:18 Ian Clarke wrote:
I've been doing quite a bit of work in my day job with people who have
done a vast amount of testing of the effectiveness of different
website designs.
If I were to condense what I've learned into a single caveman
sentence, it would be:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 07:06:30 Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Ian Clarkei...@locut.us wrote:
I've been doing quite a bit of work in my day job with people who have
done a vast amount of testing of the effectiveness of different
website designs.
If I were to
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 08:17:56 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 08:06:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
The bad thing is: our fproxy homepage don't have any picture.
Those little ActiveLinks icons got disabled by default.
Try using Firefox - at least for me it shows the
I've been doing quite a bit of work in my day job with people who have
done a vast amount of testing of the effectiveness of different
website designs.
If I were to condense what I've learned into a single caveman
sentence, it would be:
"Big dense blocks of text: BAD, Pictures: GOOD"
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> We need some (3?) screenshots. These must be legal, look reasonably good both
> in full and when thumbnailed to a reasonable size so we can put them on the
> homepage.
>
> Alternatively, please explain why it would be bad to replace the
We need some (3?) screenshots. These must be legal, look reasonably good both
in full and when thumbnailed to a reasonable size so we can put them on the
homepage.
Alternatively, please explain why it would be bad to replace the news on the
homepage with a few screenshots.
signature.asc
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
We need some (3?) screenshots. These must be legal, look reasonably good both
in full and when thumbnailed to a reasonable size so we can put them on the
homepage.
Alternatively, please explain why it would be
I've been doing quite a bit of work in my day job with people who have
done a vast amount of testing of the effectiveness of different
website designs.
If I were to condense what I've learned into a single caveman
sentence, it would be:
Big dense blocks of text: BAD, Pictures: GOOD
18 matches
Mail list logo
