Re: [freenet-dev] Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

2016-12-09 Thread Freenet
+1 For bug bounties. Maybe hire a 3rd party for 50% of the money for 6 months, and use the rest on bug bounties. Matthew Toseland: > > How are we going to move forward on converting this money and > rough-roadmap into code? Are any of the volunteer devs available? (I'm > not) Do we want to try

Re: [freenet-dev] Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

2016-12-09 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
x...@freenetproject.org writes: > Thanks for your kind words :) > > I don't have time to answer to all of this today, so I will just reply to the > most important stuff. That’s ok :) > On Friday, December 09, 2016 09:01:16 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Why did you vote *0* on finishing

Re: [freenet-dev] Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

2016-12-09 Thread Ian Clarke
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 2:07 AM, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: Ian and Florent have voiced concerns about whether my involvement in the poll could be influenced by the prospect of me benefiting financially by potentially being able to resume my job for Freenet. I don't think this is what I

Re: [freenet-dev] Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

2016-12-09 Thread xor
Thanks for your kind words :) I don't have time to answer to all of this today, so I will just reply to the most important stuff. On Friday, December 09, 2016 09:01:16 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Why did you vote *0* on finishing the first iteration of the most > critical speed fixes??

Re: [freenet-dev] Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

2016-12-09 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
x...@freenetproject.org writes: > Ian and Florent have voiced concerns about whether my involvement in the poll > could be influenced by the prospect of me benefiting financially by > potentially being able to resume my job for Freenet. > > I want to provide you with a solid proof that this is

Re: [freenet-dev] Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

2016-12-09 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Matthew Toseland writes: > The final results seem surprisingly sensible, though clearly there is > overlap and lack of clarity around the darknet enhancements stuff. Yes, it’s pretty solid. Though the only reason that fixing WoT is not at the top is that xor pulled out his vote for that (and

Re: [freenet-dev] Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

2016-12-09 Thread Matthew Toseland
On 09/12/16 07:07, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > Ian and Florent have voiced concerns about whether my involvement in the poll > could be influenced by the prospect of me benefiting financially by > potentially being able to resume my job for Freenet. > > I want to provide you with a solid

[freenet-dev] Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

2016-12-08 Thread xor
Ian and Florent have voiced concerns about whether my involvement in the poll could be influenced by the prospect of me benefiting financially by potentially being able to resume my job for Freenet. I want to provide you with a solid proof that this is not the case, which is why I decided I am