ShadowWalker apparently provides respectable anonymity up to ~ 20% compromised nodes. PISCES claims to be dramatically better but assumes darknet i.e. social connections. Can we use PISCES on both? Would it be better to use ShadowWalker on opennet and PISCES on darknet when we have sufficiently large darknets? Obviously this is problematic for hybrid networks?
Like PISCES, ShadowWalker depends on a "secure lookup" on the DHT to keep nodes' peer lists honest; PISCES assumes a 1-hop X-Vine DHT, but it looks like we can adapt this. ShadowWalker we should probably just implement directly as a separate set of connections, but it needs more work. http://www.princeton.edu/~pmittal/publications/shadowwalker-ccs09.pdf https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~hopper/shadows_wpes.pdf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
