[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-27 Thread xor
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 00:22:57 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Monday 25 May 2009 22:30:17 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > > And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better > > > way to get feedback from users. >

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-27 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 25 May 2009 22:30:17 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better > > way to get feedback from users. > > Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-27 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 25 May 2009 12:53:45 Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > After reading the rants of a user complaining about javaws not working on > #freenet, I decided to try it out: > > $wget https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/new_installer_offline.jar > $jarsigner -verify

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-26 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daigni?re wrote: > And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better > way to get feedback from users. Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the web-interface? Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text

Re: [freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-26 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 25 May 2009 12:53:45 Florent Daignière wrote: After reading the rants of a user complaining about javaws not working on #freenet, I decided to try it out: $wget https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/new_installer_offline.jar $jarsigner -verify new_installer_offline_1211.jar

Re: [freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-26 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 25 May 2009 22:30:17 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daignière wrote: And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better way to get feedback from users. Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the

Re: [freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-26 Thread xor
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 00:22:57 Matthew Toseland wrote: On Monday 25 May 2009 22:30:17 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daignière wrote: And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better way to get feedback from users.

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-25 Thread Florent Daignière
After reading the rants of a user complaining about javaws not working on #freenet, I decided to try it out: $wget https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/new_installer_offline.jar $jarsigner -verify new_installer_offline_1211.jar jar is unsigned. (signatures missing or not parsable) Needless

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-25 Thread Florent Daignière
After reading the rants of a user complaining about javaws not working on #freenet, I decided to try it out: $wget https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/new_installer_offline.jar $jarsigner -verify new_installer_offline_1211.jar jar is unsigned. (signatures missing or not parsable) Needless

Re: [freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-25 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daignière wrote: And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better way to get feedback from users. Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the web-interface? Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text