[freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread David McNab
avascript POSTing to the web will be blocked, and POSTs to Freenet will be ignored - Original Message - From: "toad" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 23:43 Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:27:25PM +1200, David McNab wrote

[freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread David McNab
Hate to say this, but the FWproxy withing Freeweb is immune to this problem :) - Original Message - From: toad To: devl at freenetproject.org Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 23:21 Subject: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode The attached file (recently posted to bugtraq

[freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread toad
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 12:06:20PM -0500, Timm Murray wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 30 May 2001 06:21, toad said: > > The attached file (recently posted to bugtraq by "eDvice Security Services" > > as an exploit to another filter proxy) is picked > > up

Re: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread toad
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 12:06:20PM -0500, Timm Murray wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 30 May 2001 06:21, toad said: > > The attached file (recently posted to bugtraq by "eDvice Security Services" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as an exploit to another filter pro

[freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread toad
p://www.mallory.net/cgi-bin/faxrep.cgi?name=blurb&browser=mozilla-4.77-linux&visitedsnarfoo=yes&visitedgj=yes&visitedevil=yes&downloadedpiratedmusic=... :) > > > - Original Message - > From: "toad" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 23:43 &

[freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread toad
script can insert into freenet via POST on the portal page. > > - Original Message - > From: toad > To: devl at freenetproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 23:21 > Subject: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode > > The attached file

[freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread toad
The attached file (recently posted to bugtraq by "eDvice Security Services" as an exploit to another filter proxy) is picked up by fproxy's filter, but only the meta tag that sets the character set. This is used by, for example, the Freenet China News sites, though they use charset=gb2312 (and h

[freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread Timm Murray
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 30 May 2001 06:27, David McNab said: > Hate to say this, but the FWproxy withing Freeweb is immune to this problem While I don't think FreeWeb itself is that great, I do think you got the FWproxy done the Right Way. - -- Timm Murray

[freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread Timm Murray
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 30 May 2001 06:21, toad said: > The attached file (recently posted to bugtraq by "eDvice Security Services" > as an exploit to another filter proxy) is picked > up by fproxy's filter, but only the meta tag that sets the character set. > T

Re: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread Timm Murray
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 30 May 2001 06:21, toad said: > The attached file (recently posted to bugtraq by "eDvice Security Services" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as an exploit to another filter proxy) is picked > up by fproxy's filter, but only the meta tag that sets th

Re: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread Timm Murray
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 30 May 2001 06:27, David McNab said: > Hate to say this, but the FWproxy withing Freeweb is immune to this problem While I don't think FreeWeb itself is that great, I do think you got the FWproxy done the Right Way. - -- Timm Murray

Re: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread toad
p://www.mallory.net/cgi-bin/faxrep.cgi?name=blurb&browser=mozilla-4.77-linux&visitedsnarfoo=yes&visitedgj=yes&visitedevil=yes&downloadedpiratedmusic=... :) > > > - Original Message - > From: "toad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread David McNab
avascript POSTing to the web will be blocked, and POSTs to Freenet will be ignored - Original Message - From: "toad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 23:43 Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode > On Wed

Re: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread toad
script can insert into freenet via POST on the portal page. > > - Original Message - > From: toad > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 23:21 > Subject: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode > > The attached file (recentl

Re: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread David McNab
Hate to say this, but the FWproxy withing Freeweb is immune to this problem :) - Original Message - From: toad To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 23:21 Subject: [freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode The attached file (recently posted to bugtraq

[freenet-devl] Content filter vs unicode

2001-05-30 Thread toad
The attached file (recently posted to bugtraq by "eDvice Security Services" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as an exploit to another filter proxy) is picked up by fproxy's filter, but only the meta tag that sets the character set. This is used by, for example, the Freenet China News sites, though they use ch