Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

2017-09-15 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Matthew John Toseland writes: > Specifically, the process for a scarce *insert* will be: > 1) Is the key popular?? We can tell this from how many peers are > subscribed to it in the ULPR table. If not, kill the request; we only > provide protection for popular

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

2017-09-15 Thread Matthew John Toseland
On 14/09/17 22:18, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Matthew John Toseland writes: >> On 14/09/17 17:33, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >>> I think the core problem is that I don’t quite understand what you’re >>> proposing. Bundles I understand, but I don’t understand how

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

2017-09-15 Thread Matthew John Toseland
On 15/09/17 20:51, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Matthew John Toseland writes: >> Specifically, the process for a scarce *insert* will be: >> 1) Is the key popular?? We can tell this from how many peers are >> subscribed to it in the ULPR table. If not, kill the