On 19/04/11 22:48, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
>> We might also want to consider some of the Maven-compatible built tools out
>> there, including Apache Ivy, Groovy Grape, and Apache Buildr.
>
>
> In fact, since we already use Ant, Apache Ivy is an
tes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110419/ab78408e/attachment.pgp>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110419/cc9f2534/attachment.pgp>
p back compatibility for the increasing number of
out-of-tree plugins, within reason.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110419/247114b3/attachment.pgp>
re of the web interface!
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110419/0d361828/attachment.pgp>
pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110419/94ccb662/attachment.pgp>
rsonal blog: http://blog.locut.us/
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110419/d1ef1d48/attachment.html>
ttp://blog.locut.us/
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110419/cb9db6dc/attachment.html>
bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110419/05f9d741/attachment.pgp>
do about javascript/GWT, which IMHO
is separate and can if necessary wait for another GSoC.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110419/08abb2ae/attachment.pgp>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Also, for the "download everything it needs", how secure is this? Do you
> have
> official documentation that says everything is signed / checksummed?
>
This is a danger. If someone wants to compromise us, with Maven they just
need to
Hi, I appreciate your efforts but there isn't much of a point using maven
unless freenet-ext is built with it too. That is the bulk of the work. As you
said, simply making a pom.xml for only fred is trivial if you know maven.
Do you have an example output of sonar to show us? Some of us are lazy
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 15:19:05 Matthew Toseland wrote:
1. A servlet container (I suggest Jetty) [or adapt already existing
SimpleToadletServer]
If we are building our own why do we need servlets? Aren't they
significantly more complex even than toadlets?
Because most servlet containers
On Monday 18 Apr 2011 15:49:50 xor wrote:
Hi,
while looking at a screenshot of Sone and being impressed at it I had the
following marketing idea:
We have FlogHelper, Freemail, Sone, Web Of Trust and Freetalk.
If we integrate them all on the web interface properly and extend them with
On Tuesday 19 Apr 2011 05:28:59 Ian Clarke wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Ximin Luo infini...@gmx.com wrote:
Also, for the download everything it needs, how secure is this? Do you
have
official documentation that says everything is signed / checksummed?
This is a danger. If
On Tuesday 19 Apr 2011 18:16:25 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 15:19:05 Matthew Toseland wrote:
1. A servlet container (I suggest Jetty) [or adapt already existing
SimpleToadletServer]
If we are building our own why do we need servlets? Aren't they
significantly
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 19:35:41 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Plus, ideally we'd like Freenet to support multiple logins.
That would be cool!
Then we could add real gateways to WoT, creating a decentral, anonymizing (as
long as you can trust your gateway) social network.
…getting even more excited
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
This is a danger. If someone wants to compromise us, with Maven they
just
need to compromise any one of our dependencies.
We would need to stick to trusted repositories, but switching to Maven
would
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Ian Clarke i...@locut.us wrote:
We might also want to consider some of the Maven-compatible built tools out
there, including Apache Ivy, Groovy Grape, and Apache Buildr.
In fact, since we already use Ant, Apache Ivy is an obvious choice.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
On 19/04/11 22:48, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Ian Clarke i...@locut.us wrote:
We might also want to consider some of the Maven-compatible built tools out
there, including Apache Ivy, Groovy Grape, and Apache Buildr.
In fact, since we already use Ant, Apache Ivy is
20 matches
Mail list logo
