On Tuesday 30 Aug 2011 18:32:17 Ian Clarke wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On Monday 29 Aug 2011 18:58:26 Ian Clarke wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Matthew Toseland
Right, the same is true of queueing. If nodes are
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 12:32:17 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> Regardless, even if queueing doesn't use additional bandwidth or CPU
> resources, it also doesn't use any less of these resources - so it doesn't
> actually help to alleviate any load (unless it results in a timeout in which
> case it
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Monday 29 Aug 2011 18:58:26 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Matthew Toseland <
> > Right, the same is true of queueing. If nodes are forced to do things to
> > deal with overloading that make the problem worse
On Monday 29 Aug 2011 18:58:26 Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Matthew Toseland <
> toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
> > Misrouting is unacceptable, in general. Extremely overloaded or extremely
> > low capacity nodes may be routed around. We might even allow some
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On Monday 29 Aug 2011 18:58:26 Ian Clarke wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Matthew Toseland
Right, the same is true of queueing. If nodes are forced to do things to
deal with overloading that make
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 12:32:17 schrieb Ian Clarke:
Regardless, even if queueing doesn't use additional bandwidth or CPU
resources, it also doesn't use any less of these resources - so it doesn't
actually help to alleviate any load (unless it results in a timeout in which
case it uses
